· Private foundation
Daniel & Chayala Glenner Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k26 grants · $43k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $51k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE DONORS FUND | $30,779 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,560 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| AGUDATH ISRAEL OF ILLINOIS | $4,344 |
| YESHIVAS KESSER YONAH | $4,310 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,372 |
| TELSHE YESHIVA CHICAGO | $2,500 |
| YESHIVA DERECH HATORAH | $1,980 |
| HATZALAH CHICAGO | $1,640 |
| AHAVAS TORAH | $1,560 |
| MESIVTA OF CLIFTON | $1,500 |
| MESIVTA SHAAREI ADIRIM | $1,500 |
| CAMP NAGEELA MIDWEST | $1,500 |
| THE KEHILLA JEWISH EDUCATION FUND | $1,200 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
30 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- YKYESHIVAS KESSER YONAH4× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +348%
- HCHATZALAH CHICAGO4× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +15%
- CCCHICAGO CHESED FUND2× · 2020–2025 · $2k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- MOMISCELLANEOUS ORGANIZED CHARITIESone grant, 2021 · $21k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $10k
- VOVARIOUS ORGANIZED CHARITESone grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Kohelet yeshiva co-ed modern orthodox k-12 yeshiva day school
Religious School
Provide college level education and extensive background of jewish law and talmudic studies and rabbinical ordination.
Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students
The mesivta high school of greater philadelphia is a jewish orthodox boys' high school, educating students in grades 9-12 in torah and secular disciplines.
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
Chabad of River North and Fulton Market is an organization dedicated to furthering the religious, educational, and chartable needs of the Jewish Community and /or of the neighbors of River North and Fulton Market.
To provide academic excellence in both limudei kodesh and secular studies.
To instill in its students a personal love for and commitment tohashem, the study and practice of torah, halacha, and jewish values asa way of life, and a love for the state of israel and the jewishpeople.
To provide secondary high school education in Brooklyn, NY
A religious school providing teaching facilities of jewish faith, history, literature, jewish life and ideals.
How this is measured
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Todd a and Raphaela Stern Family Foundation · Aj & Sl Stern Family Foundation · Walder Foundation · Dennis and Joyce Ruben Foundation · Alice G Hanson Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Bitton Family Foundation Inc · Kehillah Jewish Education Fund · Elliott and Ronni Charitable Fdn · Menachem & Ahuva Shabat Family Foundation INC · Bellows Family Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Daniel & Chayala Glenner Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Daniel & Chayala Glenner Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Daniel & Chayala Glenner Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Daniel & Chayala Glenner Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Daniel & Chayala Glenner’s filings →