Skip to content

· Private foundation

Damman Family Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$97k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$514kReligion$74kEducation$41kHuman Services$10kArts & Culture$6kEnvironment$6kRecreation & Sports$5kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $17k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$80,000
ST PETER CATHOLIC CHURCH$3,000
CENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION$2,000
LOXAHATCHEE CLUB EDUCATION$2,000
DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE$2,000
ST LUKE CATHOLIC CHURCH$1,000
HOPE RURAL SCHOOL$1,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
LIGHTHOUSE ART CENTER$1,000
HOSPICE OF PALM BEACH COUNTY$1,000
JUPITER EL SCHOOL$600
Individual grant recipient$500
DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH$500
SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF FL$350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%BRIDGE HOUSE: $2k → 9%HOSPICE OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $1k → 11%PAWS 4 LIBERTY: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
NY
MA
CT
KY
VA
MD
NM
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$645k · 25 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
17

Total granted

$645k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+83%

Still filing today

40%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $502k · revenue +158%
  • HR
    HOPE RURAL SCHOOL INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +65%
  • CENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +103%

Funded once

  • GC
    GLADNEY CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • BH
    BRIDGE HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -6%
  • SP
    ST PATRICK CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
3
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative

The mission of quantum leap healthcare collarborative is to provide management and financial support to healthcare research organizations, particularly involving breast cancer research and treatment.

Human Services
6
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
7
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
8
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
9
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
10
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
11
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
12
Addario Lung Cancer Medical Institute

The Addario Lung Cancer Medical Institute ALCMI is dedicated to catalyzing and accelerating the discovery, development and delivery of new and more effective treatment options for lung cancer patients.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of Palm Beach County Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Dynamic Catholic Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $502,000 · PhilanthropyJupiter Medical Center Foundation IncST PATRICK CHURCH: $23,200 · OtherST PATRICK CHURCHLOXAHATCHEE CLUB EDUCATION: $16,000 · OtherLOXAHATCHEE CLUB EDU…ST LUKES CHURCH: $16,000 · OtherST LUKES CHURCHWESTPORT LIBRARY: $10,000 · OtherWESTPORT LIBRARYTHE CHURCH OF ST CECILIA: $6,200 · OtherST PETER CATHOLIC CHURCH: $5,100 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $5,000 · Other+27 more: $39,290 · Other+27 moreCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION: $10,150 · Arts & CultureLIGHTHOUSE ARTCENTER INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureHOPE RURAL SCHOOL INC: $11,500 · EducationCLASP: $6,000 · EnvironmentST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,600 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $500 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $300 · HealthThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $200 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $200 · HealthSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $3,500 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$502,000Other$120,790Arts & Culture$14,150Education$11,500Environment$6,000Health$4,800Recreation & Sports$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $502,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE RURAL SCHOOL INC: $11,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION: $10,150 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCLASP: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE ARTCENTER INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $2,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGE HOUSE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHospice of Palm Beach County Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS 4 LIBERTY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOPE RURAL SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION ↗
  • Who funds CLASP ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE ARTCENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PLAY FOR PINK INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of Palm Beach County Inc ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PAWS 4 LIBERTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Damman Family Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Damman Family Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Bridge House Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Hope Rural School Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Lighthouse Artcenter Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Damman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph