Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dale and Sharon Kaiser Family Foundation Corporation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0177% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$40kReligion$17kFood & Nutrition$14kHuman Services$11kHousing & Shelter$10kHealth$9kPublic Benefit$5kCrime & Legal$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$620k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HG-IC SCHOOL$15,000
RESEARCH FOR THE KIDS$2,000
MIDWEST SHELTER FOR HOMELESS VETERANS$1,500
LEE HEALTH FOUNDATION$1,300
HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK$1,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$1,000
OPENING DOORS$1,000
HOSPICE OF DUBUQUE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
SWCAP POP UP FOOD BUS$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$500
DICKEYVILLE RESCUE SQUAD$500
THE V FOUNDATION$500
FEEDING DUBUQUE FOR HOLIDAYS$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MIDWEST SHELTER FOR HOMELESS VETERANS: $2k → 7%MIDWEST SHELTER FOR HOMELESS VETERANS: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
IA
CT
MD
KS
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$74k · 14 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
19

Total granted

$74k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+161%

Still filing today

57%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OD
    OPENING DOORS
    4× · 2020–2024 · $7k · revenue +312%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF DUBUQUE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3k · revenue +6%
  • MS
    MIDWEST SHELTER FOR HOMELESS VETERANS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3k · revenue +108%

Funded once

  • IC
    IMMACULATE CONCEPTION PARISH
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • NF
    NOACK FAMILY
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • SW
    SOUTHWEST WI COMM ACTION PROGRAM
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Iowa River Hospice Inc

Provide hospice care and bereavement support services.

Human Services
2
Hospice of Davidson County North Carolina Inc

Provide physical, psychological, social, and spiritual services to terminally ill persons and their families.

—
3
Dunkirk-Fredonia Meals On Wheels Inc

Provide balanced nutritious diets for elderly, sick and disabled persons, and others who cannot obtain or prepare their own meals.

—
4
Western South Dakota Senior Services Inc

To assist seniors in maintaining optimal health, independence, and socialization, deferring admission to long term care facilities and improving their quality of life.

—
5
Hospice of South Texas Inc

Hospice care of terminally ill patients

—
6
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
7
Polk County Womens Shelter Inc

Safety of victims of domestic violence

Human Services
8
Hospice of Darke County Inc Dba Everheart Hospice

Hospice of darke county, inc. works to maintain the value and dignity of human life by providing a choice for high quality, compassionate care and support services to patients and families with life limiting illness, to promote the…

Human Services
9
Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc

Care, hope, and support for all when illness threatens life.

Human Services
10
Hospice of Southern West Virginia Inc

To serve the needs of individuals suffering from life-limiting illness as well as to serve the individuals caring for them. to place emphasis on comfort and quality of life while fulfilling the physical, psychological, social and spiritual…

—
11
Hospice of Martha's Vineyard Inc Dba Hospice and Palliative Care of Martha's

Hospice is dedicated to planning and implementing a community-based program and perform services related to medical, psycho-social, and spiritual needs of those with serious illness and/or terminal illness and their families and those…

Human Services
12
Regional Hospice and Home Care of Western Connecticut Inc

Regional hospice approaches death by creating human connection and honoring each unique journey through a shared vision for living.our vision & values:-we believe no two patients are the same; no end-of-life experience is, either. our…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Midwest Shelter for Homeless Veterans Inc; the most unlike its peers is Research for the Kids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HG-IC SCHOOL: $36,500 · OtherHG-IC SCHOOLIMMACULATE CONCEPTION PARISH: $15,000 · OtherIMMACULATE CONCEPTION PARISHSWCAP POP UP FOOD BUS: $8,000 · OtherSWCAP POP UP FOOD BUSOPENING DOORS: $7,000 · OtherOPENING DOORSNOACK FAMILY: $6,000 · OtherNOACK FAMILYSOUTHWEST WI COMM ACTION PROGRAM: $5,000 · Other+23 more: $31,000 · Other+23 moreRESEARCH FOR THE KIDS: $3,000 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATION: $1,500 · HealthDICKEYVILLE RESCUE SQUAD INC: $500 · HealthMIDWEST SHELTER FOR HOMELESS VETERANS INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $700 · Human ServicesHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $2,000 · Food & NutritionLEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $1,300 · PhilanthropyDUBUQUE COUNTY RIGHT TO LIFE INC: $500 · Civil Rights
Other$108,500Health$5,000Human Services$3,200Food & Nutrition$2,000Philanthropy$1,300Civil Rights$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPENING DOORS: $7,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetRESEARCH FOR THE KIDS: $3,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHOSPICE OF DUBUQUE: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWEST SHELTER FOR HOMELESS VETERANS INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF STEVENS POINT: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY ADVOCATES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDUBUQUE COUNTY RIGHT TO LIFE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDICKEYVILLE RESCUE SQUAD INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPENING DOORS ↗
  • Who funds RESEARCH FOR THE KIDS ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF DUBUQUE ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST SHELTER FOR HOMELESS VETERANS INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF STEVENS POINT ↗
  • Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds DUBUQUE COUNTY RIGHT TO LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds DICKEYVILLE RESCUE SQUAD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alliant Energy Foundation IncWI17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Kaiser Family Foundation Corporation · Dubuque Racing Association Ltd · Heartland Charitable Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dale and Sharon Kaiser Family Foundation Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dale and Sharon Kaiser Family Foundation Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dale and Sharon Kaiser Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph