Skip to content

· Private foundation

D&K Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$15kRecreation & Sports$6kFood & Nutrition$5kHousing & Shelter$5kHealth$4kPhilanthropy$4kEducation$3kCrime & Legal$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,100
Median grant
4
States reached
$333k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Habitat for Humanity$5,000
City of Millbrae Recreation Departm$5,000
Second Harvest$4,000
San Francisco Historical Society$3,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
SF Maritime National Historical Par$2,000
Millbrae Historical Society$2,000
Mills Peninsula Medical Center$2,000
UCSF$2,000
KQED$2,000
Millbrae Community Foundation$2,000
Queen of Peace Foundation$2,000
de Young Museum$1,100
LEAD Law Enforcement Against Drugs$1,000
Farming Hope$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Queen of Peace Foundation: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13k · 5 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$13k
$5k

Still filing today

40%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Human ServicesEmploymentInternationalAnimalsArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k
  • KI
    KQED INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue +11%
  • SM
    SF Maritime National Historical Par
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k

Funded once

  • UF
    USF Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
2
Monterey Museum of Art

The monterey museum of art cultivates curiosity in the visual arts and engages community with the diversity of california art - past, present, and future.

Arts & Culture
3
San Francisco Zoological Society

To connect all people with wildlife, inspire caring for nature, and advance conservation action.

Animals
4
Sonoma Botanical Garden
—
5
San Francisco Maritime National Park Association

Education & preservation of maritime history and knowledge; engaging or assisting in the maintenance, acquisition & operation of maritime & maritime-related museums, exhibits, libraries & parks; supporting & assisting the San Francisco…

Arts & Culture
6
Museum of Sonoma County

The museum of sonoma county engages and inspires our diverse community with art and history exhibitions, collections, and public programs that are inclusive, educational, and relevant.

Arts & Culture
7
San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory

The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.

Environment
8
San Francisco Architectural Heritage

The Organizations primary impact is to preserve and enhance San Franciscos unique architectural and cultural identity.

Arts & Culture
9
San Francisco Public Press

The mission of the San Francisco Public Press is to enrich civic life by publishing investigative and solutions journalism that engages diverse audiences and promotes public accountability. The San Francisco Public Press…

Education
10
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
11
Monterra Credit Union

Passionately deliver relevant products, services, and education tailored to help our members, employees, and communities achieve their financial goals.

Public Benefit
12
Pacific Coast Farmers Market Association

Our mission is to support california farmers and communities by providing farmers markets for our diverse bay area neighborhoods. we do this by operating certified farmers markets in six bay area counties. these farmers markets provide…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Mateo County Historical Association; the most unlike its peers is Queen of Peace Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Habitat for Humanity: $5,000 · OtherHabitat for HumanityCity of Millbrae Recreation Departm: $5,000 · OtherCity of Millbrae Recreation DepartmSecond Harvest: $4,000 · OtherSecond HarvestSan Francisco Historical Society: $3,500 · OtherSan Francisco Historical SocietyIndividual grant recipient: $3,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUSF Foundation: $3,000 · OtherUSF FoundationSF Maritime National Historical Par: $3,000 · OtherSF Maritime National Historical ParIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherMills Peninsula Medical Center: $2,000 · OtherUCSF: $2,000 · Other+11 more: $7,105 · Other+11 moreMILLBRAE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,000 · PhilanthropyKQED INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureMILLBRAE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,500 · Public BenefitQUEEN OF PEACE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Human ServicesPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $1,100 · EnvironmentFARMING HOPE: $1,000 · Employment
Other$39,705Philanthropy$3,000Arts & Culture$3,000Public Benefit$2,500Human Services$2,000Environment$1,100Employment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMILLBRAE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetKQED INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetQUEEN OF PEACE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN MATEO COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds San Francisco Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds MILLBRAE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds MILLBRAE HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds QUEEN OF PEACE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds FARMING HOPE ↗
  • Who funds SAN MATEO COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization D&K Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from D&K Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to D&K Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to D&K Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on D&K’s filings →

    More from the funding graph