Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Cynthia Rose Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$472
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kHuman Services$2kRecreation & Sports$1kInternational$1kFood & Nutrition$650Housing & Shelter$100
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$400
Median grant
2
States reached
$26k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$472
Maui Food Bank$400
Imua Family Services$250
Organic Acedemia Association$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $900) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Trellis Supportive Care: $250 → 15%Trellis Supportive Care: $250 → 15%Hospice Maui: $400 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7k · 7 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$7k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+27%

Still filing today

71%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $472 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    IMUA FAMILY SERVICES
    3× · 2021–2025 · $1k · revenue +27%
  • MAUI FOOD BANK INC
    2× · 2020–2025 · $650 · revenue +138%
  • HP
    HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARECENTER
    2× · 2020–2021 · $500 · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • SF
    SEVA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue +50%
  • HM
    HOSPICE MAUI INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $400 · revenue +27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hui Pohala

Palliative care is a win-win-win-win. expanding access to palliative care benefits all parts of the healthcare system. people living with serious illness are better able to manage physical and emotional symptoms and have peace of mind that…

Health
2
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
3
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
4
Maika I Health Corporation

To be the patient-centered healthcare home that is accessible for all and be the center for healthcare learning excellence in East Hawaii.

Health
5
Kapi'olani Medical Specialists

Kapi'olani medical specialists (dba hawai'i pacific health medical group) is a multispecialty provider group dedicated to providing world-class care for adults and children across hawai'i and the pacific region working in partnership with…

Health
6
Global Partners in Care

The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.

International
7
Hospice Hawaii Inc

To promote the quality of life for persons facing life-limiting illnesses and for their families.

Human Services
8
Kokua Mau Inc

Improve the quality of life for the people of Hawaii by promoting excellence in hospice, end of life care, palliative care, and early advanced care planning.

Human Services
9
Solar Cookers International

The mission of Solar Cookers International is to improve human health, economic well-being, womens empowerment, and the environment by promoting climate-friendly solar cooking for vulnerable populations worldwide.

Environment
10
Waimanalo Health Center

Waimanalo health center is committed to providing the highest level of primary and preventive health services, with special attention to the needs of native hawaiians and the medically underserved, and improving the health and wellness of…

Health
11
Handicap International

Handicap international dba humanity & inclusion (hi) works with people with disabilities and people living in situations of vulnerability, including poverty, exclusion, conflict, and disaster.

International
12
Waianae Distr Comprehensive Health &

The waianae coast comprehensive health center ("the health center") is a healing center that provides accessible and affordable medical and traditional healing services with aloha. the health center is a learning center that offers health…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice & Palliative Carecenter and the most unlike its peers is Inclusion Matters by Shanes Inspiration. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $3,336 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOrganic Acedemia Association — $1,550 · OtherOrganic Acedemia AssociationOrganic Acidemia Association Corporation — $1,200 · OtherOrganic Acidemia Association CorporationSeva — $500 · OtherSevaIndividual grant recipient — $472 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $300 · Other+2 more — $200 · OtherInclusion Matters by Shanes Inspiration — $1,300 · Recreation & SportsInclusion M…SEVA FOUNDATION — $500 · InternationalSEVA FOUN…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $300 · InternationalWORLD CEN…International Rescue Committee INC — $300 · InternationalInternati…IMUA FAMILY SERVICES — $1,050 · HealthIMUA FAMI…HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARECENTER — $500 · Human ServicesHOSPICE MAUI INC — $400 · Human ServicesMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $650 · Food & Nutrition
Other$7,558Recreation & Sports$1,300International$1,100Health$1,050Human Services$900Food & Nutrition$650

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetInclusion Matters by Shanes Inspiration — $1,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOrganic Acidemia Association Corporation — $1,200 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetIMUA FAMILY SERVICES — $1,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARECENTER — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEVA FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE MAUI INC — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL11.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cynthia Rose Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph