Skip to content
Curtis Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Curtis Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$19k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$102kEducation$55kHealth$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kArts & Culture$3kPublic Benefit$2kYouth Development$1kCrime & Legal$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,091
Median grant
1
States reached
$369k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN RED CROSS$6,000
TSTC FOUNDATION$6,000
TEXAS SPECIAL CHILDREN'S PROJECT$5,091
USVMC EAST TEXAS$1,800
EAST TEXAS FOOD BANK$550
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TEXAS SPECIAL CHILDREN'S PROJECT: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$152k · 4 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +159% since the first grant, against +68% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$152k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+159%
+68%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic BenefitEmploymentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    6× · 2017–2022 · $99k
  • TC
    TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2023 · $49k · revenue +60%
  • HM
    HAVERTYSNEWGATE MISSION
    3× · 2017–2022 · $3k

Funded once

  • WT
    WINDRIDGE THERAPEUTIC EQ CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREGG CO
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • HM
    HEARTISANS MARKETPLACE
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for 20TH Century Texas Studies
—
2
Tx Performing Chinese Arts
—
3
Texas Clean Energy Coalition
—
4
Texas Flying Legends Museum
—
5
Arts Longview

Our mission is to spark a love of the arts, history, and culture in order to celebrate and enhance our creative community. from our hometown charm to our urban spirit, we are the art and soul of longview.

Arts & Culture
6
University of North Texas Health Science Center At Ft Worth Health Systems

To improve the health and quality of life for the people of texas and beyond through excellence in education, research, clinical care, community engagement and to provide national leadership in primary care.

Health
7
Texas Trust Gives
Philanthropy
8
Tex-E Inc
Education
9
North Central Texas Medical Foundation
Health
10
Disabled American Veterans of Texas Service Foundation
Human Services
11
Greater Texas Foundation
Education
12
Texas Prairieland Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Tstc Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Usvmc East Texas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $98,512 · OtherFIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCHAMERICAN RED CROSS: $6,000 · OtherWINDRIDGE THERAPEUTIC EQ CENTER: $5,000 · Other+5 more: $6,550 · Other+5 moreTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $48,780 · EducationTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITYTHE TSTC FOUNDATION: $6,000 · EducationTHE TSTC FOUNDATIONTEXAS SPECIAL CHILDREN'S PROJECTS INC: $5,091 · Human ServicesLONGVIEW MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $2,000 · Arts & CultureUSVMC EAST TEXAS: $1,800 · Public BenefitHEARTISANS MARKETPLACE: $1,000 · EmploymentMARTIN HOUSE CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $1,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$116,062Education$54,780Human Services$5,091Arts & Culture$2,000Public Benefit$1,800Employment$1,000Crime & Legal$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $48,780 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TSTC FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS SPECIAL CHILDREN'S PROJECTS INC: $5,091 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetLONGVIEW MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHEARTISANS MARKETPLACE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHIWAY 80 RESCUE MISSION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARTIN HOUSE CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE TSTC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS SPECIAL CHILDREN'S PROJECTS INC ↗
  • Who funds LONGVIEW MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds USVMC EAST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds HEARTISANS MARKETPLACE ↗
  • Who funds HIWAY 80 RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds MARTIN HOUSE CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Texas Communitie…American Electric Pow…Rosa May Griffin Foun…The Crain FoundationGreater Houston Commu…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
East Texas Communities FoundationTX15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Texas Communities Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Rosa May Griffin Foundation · The Crain Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Curtis Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Curtis Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Curtis Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Curtis Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Curtis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home