Skip to content

· Public charity

Curepsp Inc

To raise awareness, build community, improve care and find a cure for psp, cbd and msa.

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.8MPhilanthropy$787kScience & Tech$486kEducation$384kSocial Science$32k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $1,235,474, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,740,086 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $504,612 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.1M
$100,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH TEXAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$200,000
REGENERATIVE RESEARCH FOUNDATION$150,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$125,000
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE - GRANTS$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER$100,000
MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS$100,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$100,000
SJO RESEARCH & CONSULTING$54,474
STANFORD OFFICE OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION$50,000
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$45,000
UNIVERSITY RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION - UNIV OF CHICAGO$40,000
THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION$30,000
FOUNDATION FOR THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Banner Health: $90k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $100k → 11%UM Amherst: $90k → 12%Massachusetts General Hospita: $90k → 16%SJO RESEARCH & CONSULTING: $63k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $59k → 11%University of Pennsylvania: $100k → 22%UCLA: $100k → 14%HUMBOLDT STATE UNIVERSITY: $100k → 18%Regenerative Research Foundat: $80k → 11%REGENERATIVE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $150k → 14%Columbia University: $50k → 17%North Texas Community Fdtn: $200k → 11%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE - GRANTS: $100k → 16%MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE: $100k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $45k → 16%OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 12%Duke University: $80k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $100k → 13%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $100k → 9%FOUNDATION FOR THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH: $25k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $75k → 19%SJO RESEARCH & CONSULTING: $54k → 6%University of Pennsylvania: $90k → 22%The Regents of the UCLA: $100k → 14%REGENERATIVE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $40k → 11%TEACHERS COLL COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $50k → 17%NORTH TEXAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200k → 11%UT Health Science Center at S: $100k → 16%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $30k → 16%MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE: $100k → 14%UNIVERSITY RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION - UNIV OF CHICAGO: $40k → 14%The Regents of the UCLA: $100k → 14%TEACHERS COLLEGE COLUMBIA UNIV: $50k → 17%NORTH TEXAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $180k → 11%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $125k → 14%UCLA: $96k → 14%THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION: $30k → 17%North Texas Community Fdtn: $107k → 11%The Regents of the UCLA: $90k → 14%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $44k → 17%North Texas Community Foundat: $100k → 11%USC Keck School of Medicine: $30k → 14%Icahn School of Medicine at M: $75k → 17%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS: $100k → 11%UCLA: $19k → 14%Ichan School of Medicine: $50k → 17%Jeff Golub Documentary LLC: $32k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CA
NE
VA
MD
AZ
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 50% of Curepsp Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 15% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 11%.

Curepsp Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 9 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
16

Total granted

$1.8M
$924k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+40%

Still filing today

44%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $481k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RR
    REGENERATIVE RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2025 · $270k · revenue +63%
  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
    4× · 2017–2023 · $137k · revenue +58%
  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    2× · 2024–2025 · $130k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNIV OF TX HEALTH SCIENCE CTR OF SA
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • CP
    CAL POLY HUMBOLDT SPONSORED PROGRAMS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +136%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
2
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
3
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
4
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
5
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
6
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
7
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
8
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
9
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
10
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
11
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
12
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Chicago; the most unlike its peers is Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
19/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $505,348 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIAMAYO CLINIC: $200,000 · OtherMAYO CLINICUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $190,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTSTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE: $170,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL C…SJO RESEARCH & CONSULTING: $117,454 · OtherSJO RESEARCH & CONSULTINGTHE UNIV OF TX HEALTH SCIENCE CTR OF SA: $100,000 · OtherTHE UNIV OF TX HEALTH SCIENCE CTR OF SABOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA: $100,000 · OtherBOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKAUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILLMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $90,000 · Other+7 more: $158,195 · Other+7 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $190,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF…ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $137,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT M…Baylor College of Medicine: $130,000 · EducationBaylor College of MedicineCAL POLY HUMBOLDT SPONSORED PROGRAMS FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationCAL POLY HUMBOLDT SPONSORED P…Teachers College Columbia University: $99,918 · EducationTeachers College Columbia Uni…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $94,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIV…New York University: $83,500 · EducationNew York UniversityDUKE UNIVERSITY: $80,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $75,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $59,449 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationUniversity of Chicago: $40,000 · Education+1 more: $30,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS (TAX: $886,900 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION O…REGENERATIVE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $270,000 · HealthREGENERATIVE R…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $125,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DI…Banner Health: $90,000 · HealthBanner HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $30,000 · HealthTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $29,341 · HealthFoundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc: $25,000 · Health+2 more: $20,000 · Health
Other$1,830,997Education$1,168,867Philanthropy$886,900Health$589,341

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS (TAX: $886,900 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetREGENERATIVE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $270,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $190,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $137,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $130,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $125,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAL POLY HUMBOLDT SPONSORED PROGRAMS FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTeachers College Columbia University: $99,918 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $94,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBanner Health: $90,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $83,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $80,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $59,449 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $29,341 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATION FOR FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Curepsp Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Curepsp Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology: 14% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Curepsp’s filings →

More from the funding graph