· Public charity
Culturesource
CULTURESOURCE advances creative and cultural expression in southeast michigan.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 76 grants below total $1,765,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,925,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,160,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $91k
- $10k–50k57 grants · $1.2M
- $50k–250k6 grants · $438k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA DBA WRCJ 909 | $83,000 |
| DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $77,500 |
| DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS | $72,500 |
| DETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY | $72,500 |
| COLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES | $70,000 |
| BOARD OF GOVENORS DBA WAYNE STATE | $62,500 |
| SPHINX ORGANIZATION INC | $36,500 |
| INSIDEOUT LITERARY ARTS PROJECT | $36,500 |
| HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER | $36,500 |
| MOSAIC YOUTH THEATRE | $36,500 |
| MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DETROIT | $36,500 |
| DETROIT JAZZ FESTIVAL FOUNDATION | $36,500 |
| THE HENRY FORD | $36,500 |
| MACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $36,500 |
| DETROIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $36,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
56 repeat relationships — 54 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $237k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DPDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA3× · 2022–2024 · $166k · revenue +13%
- DZDETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY3× · 2022–2024 · $145k · revenue +16%
THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS3× · 2022–2024 · $145k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- NGNORWEST GALLERY OF ART LLCone grant, 2023 · $11k
ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $11k · revenue +153%- NSNATHANIEL STANLEY MULLEN IIIone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Motion picture exhibition
Detroit dance collective believes in the expressive power of dance as a transformative force that reflects significant social issues and human expression. through our performances and educational programs, we explore the intellectual,…
The goal of the detroit performing artists is to provide quality artistic performance opportunities for the amateur musician, performance and income opportunities for the professional musician and educational opportunities for younger…
Theater organ concerts & movie theatre
To enrich the communities of Southeastern Michigan in fostering excellence and innovation to our community in the performance of orchestral music to educate current and future audiences
The Center's mission is to inspire, entertain, educate, and serve all in Northern Michigan year-round by presenting exceptional experiences across the full spectrum of the performing arts and offering impactful educational opportunities.
Mighty Real/Queer Detroit provides a platform for artistic exploration of various queer perspectives. The organization uses the contemplative spirit of the arts to foster an understanding of the diversity of the LGBTQ+ experience, which…
The mission of the northwest michigan arts & culture network ("the network") is to harness the collective power of the creative sector to cultivate vibrant communities by strengthening the regional ecosystem that supports arts and culture.…
To be a contemporary forum for thevisual arts through education, exploration, collaboration and exhibition, and to engage minds, expand perspectives and inspire growth in students of all ages, teachers, artists, and the community.
Buffalo prescott's mission is to nurture the growth of detroit's contemporary art ecosystem by providing direct material support to artists, fostering multi-layered interactions, and offering accessible educational/cultural programming.
D.Cipher is a music mastermind collective and organization that serves Detroits community of musicians through shared learning, resources, and collaboration, and uplifts and celebrates Detroits musical legacy and emerging musical talent by…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Detroit Creativity Project and the most unlike its peers is Canfield Consortium. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
- Who funds DETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
- Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds INSIDEOUT LITERARY ARTS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE PEWABIC SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds SPHINX ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds Living Arts ↗
- Who funds Detroit Historical Society ↗
- Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MOSAIC YOUTH THEATRE OF DETROIT ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DETROIT ↗
- Who funds MUSIC HALL CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY ↗
- Who funds DETROIT OPERA ↗
- Who funds THE EDISON INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds DETROIT JAZZ FESTIVAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND S ↗
- Who funds THE ARTS LEAGUE OF MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC THEATRE ↗
- Who funds Birmingham Bloomfield Art Ctr Inc ↗
- Who funds MOTOWN HISTORICAL MUSUEM INC ↗
- Who funds MATRIX THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds AKROPOLIS QUINTET INC ↗
- Who funds ARTS & SCRAPS ↗
- Who funds Millan Theatre Company ↗
- Who funds EISENHOWER DANCE ENSEMBLE INC ↗
- Who funds HERITAGE WORKS ↗
- Who funds DETROIT PUPPET COMPANY ↗
- Who funds GREAT LAKES CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds THE DETROIT PUBLIC LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAR CONSERVATORY OF THERAPEUTIC AND PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds DETROIT CHAMBER WINDS INC ↗
- Who funds CHAMBER MUSIC DETROIT ↗
- Who funds SIDEWALK DETROIT ↗
- Who funds SIGNAL RETURN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Kresge Foundation · The Fred & Barbara Erb Family Foundation · The Skillman Foundation · Hudson-Webber Foundation · Max M & Marjorie S Fisher Foundation Inc · Dte Energy Foundation · Michigan Humanities Council · The Miami Foundation Inc · Ford Philanthropy · Flagstar Foundation Inc · United Jewish Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Culturesource funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.