Skip to content

· Private foundation

Crystal Print Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$125k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$220kYouth Development$192kHousing & Shelter$148kHuman Services$139kPublic Safety & Disaster$116kArts & Culture$73kFood & Nutrition$57kEnvironment$53kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $95k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$4,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION$10,000
LITTLE CHUTE WINDMILL ASSOCIATION$10,000
CHILDREN'S WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$10,000
ST JOE'S FOOD PROGRAM$7,000
VIETNAM VETERANS CHAPTER 224$6,000
LEAVEN$5,000
HARBOR HOUSE$5,000
COMMUNITY OUTREACH TRANSITIONAL SERVICES$5,000
CATALPA HEALTH$5,000
OUTAGAMIE COUNTY 4H$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
TOWN OF CENTER FIRE DEPARTMENT$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOX VALLEY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOX VALLEY: $5k → 7%LEAVEN: $5k → 6%LEAVEN: $5k → 6%LEAVEN: $5k → 6%LEAVEN: $5k → 6%LEAVEN: $5k → 6%LEAVEN: $5k → 6%LEAVEN: $5k → 6%LEAVEN: $5k → 6%LEAVEN: $5k → 6%Community Clothes Closet: $3k → 6%COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $2k → 6%COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $2k → 6%COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $2k → 6%COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $2k → 6%COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $2k → 6%COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $2k → 6%COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $2k → 6%COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $2k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 35 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
4

Total granted

$1.0M
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+69%

Still filing today

40%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEnvironmentEmploymentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CATALPA HEALTH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +33%
  • PI
    PILLARS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $40k · revenue +460%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $40k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
  • WH
    Willow Hearts
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • FV
    FOX VALLEY CHORUS OF SWEET ADELINESgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +69%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fox Cities Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

Fox cities chamber of commerce and industry, inc. is dedicated to developing, advancing, and promoting the economic, industrial, commerical, professional, cultural, and civic welfare of the fox cities area.

—
2
Community Foundation of the Fox River Valley

To provide effective and rewarding ways for donors to fulfill their philanthropic objectives by administering charitable funds that distribute grants and scholarships to benefit the citizens of kane and kendall counties of illinois…

Philanthropy
3
Fox Valley Farms Inc

Preventing & Reducing Homelessness among People and Pets

Housing & Shelter
4
Fox Communities Credit Union

We partner with our members, communities, and fox family to build stronger financial futures.

—
5
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
6
Fox Valley Hands of Hope Inc

We provide compassionate guidance and support for the grieving. Fox Valley Hands of Hope is a nonprofit organization dedicated to providing expert support for children, families, and adults who are experiencing grief, loss, or…

—
7
St Croix Valley Habitat for Humanity Inc

St. croix valley habitat for humanity partners with working families, sponsors, and communities to build affordable, sustainable, quality homes and to provide support services that promote successful home purchase and ownership in pierce…

—
8
Community Real Estate and Personal Property Foundation Inc

Promote philanthropy by the acceptance and disposition of real estate and personal property for charitable purposes.

Philanthropy
9
Help of Door County Inc

The mission of help of door county, inc. is to eliminate domestic abuse through prevention and intervention services and to advocate for social change.

Health
10
Family Promise of the Chippewa Valley Inc

Advocate for and support families who are homeless in our community by providing temporary housing and support services, and by fostering independence.

Human Services
11
Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc

We strengthen our community for current and future generations by helping people make a difference in the lives of all.

Philanthropy
12
Casa of East Central Wisconsin

The mission of casa of east central wisconsin is to advocate for the best interest of children who have experienced abuse or neglect, who are in need of court protection, to ensure they have a safe and permanent home and the opportunity to…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of the Fox Cities Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of High Cliff State Park. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LITTLE CHUTE WINDMILL ASSOCIATION: $80,000 · OtherLITTLE CHUTE WINDMILL ASSOCIATIONBOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $55,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBST JOE'S FOOD PROGRAM: $55,000 · OtherST JOE'S FOOD PROGRAMDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION: $50,000 · OtherDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATIONFOX VALLEY LUTHERAN HOMES INC: $47,000 · OtherFOX VALLEY LUTHERAN HOMES INCIndividual grant recipient: $46,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOUTAGAMIE COUNTY 4H: $45,000 · OtherOUTAGAMIE COUNTY 4HTown of Center Fire Department: $45,000 · OtherTown of Center Fire DepartmentIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLITTLE CHUTE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $35,000 · OtherST ELIZABETH FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Other+24 more: $198,000 · Other+24 moreCATALPA HEALTH INC: $75,000 · HealthCATALPA HEALT…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC: $40,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HO…SPIERINGS CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 · HealthSPIERINGS CAN…+1 more: $3,000 · HealthPILLARS INC: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterCOTS INC: $37,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterLEAVEN INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $19,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOX VALLEY INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesHARBOR HOUSE DOMESTIC ABUSE PROGRAMS INC: $45,000 · EmploymentFRIENDS OF HIGH CLIFF STATE PARK: $25,000 · EnvironmentUNITED WAY FOX CITIES INC: $18,000 · Philanthropy
Other$726,000Health$129,000Housing & Shelter$78,000Human Services$69,000Employment$45,000Environment$25,000Philanthropy$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATALPA HEALTH INC: $75,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHARBOR HOUSE DOMESTIC ABUSE PROGRAMS INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetLEAVEN INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetPILLARS INC: $40,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOTS INC: $37,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF HIGH CLIFF STATE PARK: $25,000 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $19,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY FOX CITIES INC: $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHOMELESS CONNECTIONS INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSPIERINGS CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetFOX VALLEY WARMING SHELTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCHALLENGE THE OUTDOORS INC: $8,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetGORDON BUBOLZ NATURE PRESERVE INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetEMPOWERED TUTORING INC: $6,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCASA OF THE FOX CITIES INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBEAMING INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFOX VALLEY CHORUS OF SWEET ADELINES: $1,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATALPA HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds HARBOR HOUSE DOMESTIC ABUSE PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds LEAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds PILLARS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds COTS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HIGH CLIFF STATE PARK ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY FOX CITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMELESS CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SPIERINGS CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOX VALLEY WARMING SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHALLENGE THE OUTDOORS INC ↗
  • Who funds GORDON BUBOLZ NATURE PRESERVE INC ↗
  • Who funds EMPOWERED TUTORING INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF THE FOX CITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOX VALLEY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region IncWI37.9× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · J J Keller Foundation Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · The Clarence Wallace & Dolores Lynch Wallace Family Foundation · Hartwig Family Foundation Inc · The William J and Barbara a Schmidt Family Foundation Inc · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Women's Fund for the Fox Valley Region Inc · United Way Fox Cities Inc · The Boldt Family Fund Inc · Theda and Tamblin Clark Smith Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crystal Print Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crystal Print Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Crystal Print Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Crystal Print Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Crystal Print’s filings →

    More from the funding graph