· Private foundation
Crystal Print Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k28 grants · $95k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDREN'S WISCONSIN FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| LITTLE CHUTE WINDMILL ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| ST JOE'S FOOD PROGRAM | $7,000 |
| VIETNAM VETERANS CHAPTER 224 | $6,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOX VALLEY | $5,000 |
| OUTAGAMIE COUNTY 4H | $5,000 |
| HARBOR HOUSE | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| CATALPA HEALTH | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| COMMUNITY OUTREACH TRANSITIONAL SERVICES | $5,000 |
| TOWN OF CENTER FIRE DEPARTMENT | $5,000 |
| LEAVEN | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
35 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCATALPA HEALTH INC9× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +33%
- CHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC4× · 2021–2024 · $40k · revenue +22%
- PIPILLARS INC7× · 2019–2025 · $40k · revenue +460%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $7k
- WHWillow Heartsone grant, 2017 · $4k
- FVFOX VALLEY CHORUS OF SWEET ADELINESgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +69%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Fox cities chamber of commerce and industry, inc. is dedicated to developing, advancing, and promoting the economic, industrial, commerical, professional, cultural, and civic welfare of the fox cities area.
To provide effective and rewarding ways for donors to fulfill their philanthropic objectives by administering charitable funds that distribute grants and scholarships to benefit the citizens of kane and kendall counties of illinois…
Preventing & Reducing Homelessness among People and Pets
We partner with our members, communities, and fox family to build stronger financial futures.
Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…
We provide compassionate guidance and support for the grieving. Fox Valley Hands of Hope is a nonprofit organization dedicated to providing expert support for children, families, and adults who are experiencing grief, loss, or…
St. croix valley habitat for humanity partners with working families, sponsors, and communities to build affordable, sustainable, quality homes and to provide support services that promote successful home purchase and ownership in pierce…
Promote philanthropy by the acceptance and disposition of real estate and personal property for charitable purposes.
The mission of help of door county, inc. is to eliminate domestic abuse through prevention and intervention services and to advocate for social change.
Advocate for and support families who are homeless in our community by providing temporary housing and support services, and by fostering independence.
We strengthen our community for current and future generations by helping people make a difference in the lives of all.
The mission of casa of east central wisconsin is to advocate for the best interest of children who have experienced abuse or neglect, who are in need of court protection, to ensure they have a safe and permanent home and the opportunity to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of the Fox Cities Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of High Cliff State Park. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CATALPA HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds HARBOR HOUSE DOMESTIC ABUSE PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds LEAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds PILLARS INC ↗
- Who funds COTS INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF HIGH CLIFF STATE PARK ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY FOX CITIES INC ↗
- Who funds HOMELESS CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds SPIERINGS CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOX VALLEY WARMING SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHALLENGE THE OUTDOORS INC ↗
- Who funds GORDON BUBOLZ NATURE PRESERVE INC ↗
- Who funds EMPOWERED TUTORING INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOX VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF THE FOX CITIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · J J Keller Foundation Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · The Clarence Wallace & Dolores Lynch Wallace Family Foundation · Hartwig Family Foundation Inc · The William J and Barbara a Schmidt Family Foundation Inc · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Women's Fund for the Fox Valley Region Inc · United Way Fox Cities Inc · The Boldt Family Fund Inc · Theda and Tamblin Clark Smith Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Crystal Print Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Crystal Print Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Crystal Print Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.