Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Crowley Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Religion$38kHuman Services$38kEducation$30kHousing & Shelter$21kRecreation & Sports$12kHealth$8kYouth Development$4kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$436k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAURA FOUNDATION$3,000
CAMP FATIMA$3,000
DIOCESE OF ST AUGUSTINE$3,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW HAMPSHIRE$3,000
SANTA MARIA DEL MAR CATHOLIC CHURCH$3,000
GIBSON CENTER FOR SENIOR SERVICES$2,500
MOTHER SETON HOUSE$2,500
FLAGLER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$2,000
ALPHA WOMEN'S CENTER$2,000
DISMAS HOME OF NEW HAMPSHIRE$2,000
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS- JIM BOOE$2,000
OUR LADY OF THE MOUNTAINS CATHOLIC CHURCH$1,000
STONE MOUNTAIN ARTS CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MOTHER SETON HOUSE: $3k → 13%CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW HAMPSHIRE: $3k → 7%MOTHER SETON HOUSE: $3k → 13%CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW HAMPSHIRE: $2k → 7%MOTHER SETON HOUSE: $3k → 13%MOTHER SETON HOUSE: $2k → 13%MOTHER SETON HOUSE: $2k → 13%MOTHER SETON HOUSE: $2k → 13%GIBSON CENTER FOR SENIOR SERVICES: $3k → 9%GIBSON CENTER FOR SENIOR SERVICES: $3k → 9%GIBSON CENTER FOR SENIOR SERVICES: $3k → 9%GIBSON CENTER FOR SENIOR SERVICES: $2k → 9%GIBSON CENTER FOR SENIOR SERVICES: $2k → 9%GIBSON CENTER FOR SENIOR SERVICES: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$131k · 17 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
10

Total granted

$131k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
0%

Still filing today

29%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GIBSON CENTER FOR SENIOR SERVICES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +22%
  • CF
    CAMP FATIMA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $12k · revenue +1%
  • NH
    New Hampshire Catholic Charities
    2× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • NH
    NEW HAMPSHIRE CATHOLIC APPEAL
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • HH
    HARVEST HILLS ANIMAL SHELTER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Harbor Homes Inc

Harbor Care's mission is to provide vital services, including housing and healthcare to all in our communities needing assistance. Our vision is one where everyone gets to live safe, stable, and healthy lives, filled with purpose, respect…

Housing & Shelter
2
Helping Hands Outreach Ministries Inc

Transitional and permanent supportive housing - provides shelter in the greater Manchester NH area. Services include housing, counseling (including substance abuse counseling), job search assistance, etc.

Housing & Shelter
3
The Homestead Inc
4
Health Strategies of New Hampshire Inc
Health
5
Southern New Hampshire Rescue Mission

We exist to share the hope of the Gospel of Jesus Christ as well as provide shelter, food, and clothing to the poor and needy in obedience to Him.

Religion
6
Greater Nashua Council on Alcoholism Keystone Hall

The holding company for 615 Amherst St, Harbor Care's licensed residential treatment center for individuals and families living with substance use disorder.

Health
7
Habitat for Humanity of the Kearsarge Sunapee Area Inc

To witness to and implement the Gospel of Jesus Christ in the towns of Andover, Bradford, Danbury, New London, Springfield, Sunapee, Sutton, Newbury, Wilmot and Newport located in the State of NH by working with economically disadvantaged…

8
The Farmington Home for Aged People
9
Manchester Health Services Inc

Home Health Care

10
Job Haines Home for Aged People
11
Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative, Inc. will ensure access to quality care within the communities in which our patients live, provide local and high quality care with positive outcomes to our patients in Coos County while…

12
Southeast Nh Habitat for Humanity

To build affordable homes in partnership with low income families through volunteer labor, donated materials, and charitable contributions.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Hampshire Catholic Charities and the most unlike its peers is Mother Seton House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAINT ELIZABETH ANN SETON CATHOLIC SCHOOL — $17,300 · OtherSAINT ELIZABETH ANN SETON CATHOLIC SCHOOLSANTA MARIA DELMAR CATHOLIC CHURCH — $12,300 · OtherSANTA MARIA DELMAR CATHOLIC CHURCHCAMP FATIMA INC — $11,500 · OtherCAMP FATIMA INCRCBM PRIESTS RETIREMENT TRUST FUND — $9,000 · OtherRCBM PRIESTS RETIREMENT TRUST FUNDDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS- JIM BOOE — $9,000 · OtherDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS- JIM BOOECARMELITE MONASTERY — $7,500 · OtherCARMELITE MONASTERYFlagler Habitat For Humanity Inc — $7,000 · OtherFlagler Habitat For Humanity IncDIOCESE OF ST AUGUSTINE — $5,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES-SAINT AUGUSTINE — $4,000 · Other+15 more — $31,484 · Other+15 moreMOTHER SETON HOUSE INC — $13,500 · Human ServicesMOTHER SETON HOUSE INCGIBSON CENTER FOR SENIOR SERVICES INC — $13,500 · Human ServicesGIBSON CENTER FOR SENIO…New Hampshire Catholic Charities — $5,000 · Human ServicesNew Hampshire Catholic …JENS FRIENDS CANCER FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyHARVEST HILLS ANIMAL SHELTER INC — $2,000 · AnimalsDISMAS HOME OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC — $2,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$114,584Human Services$32,000Philanthropy$5,000Animals$2,000Crime & Legal$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMOTHER SETON HOUSE INC — $13,500 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetGIBSON CENTER FOR SENIOR SERVICES INC — $13,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFlagler Habitat For Humanity Inc — $7,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJENS FRIENDS CANCER FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHARVEST HILLS ANIMAL SHELTER INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MOTHER SETON HOUSE INC
  • Who funds GIBSON CENTER FOR SENIOR SERVICES INC
  • Who funds CAMP FATIMA INC
  • Who funds Flagler Habitat For Humanity Inc
  • Who funds New Hampshire Catholic Charities
  • Who funds JENS FRIENDS CANCER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FRIENDS 4 SEASONS
  • Who funds HARVEST HILLS ANIMAL SHELTER INC
  • Who funds DISMAS HOME OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Crowley Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Crowley Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Crowley Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph