Skip to content

· Public charity

Crotched Mountain Foundation

The Crotched Mountain Foundation is the parent organization of the affiliated programs of Crotched Mountain which creates opportunities for children and adults with disabilities and chronic conditions to live, learn and thrive in their own communities.

$986k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$33MEducation$1.7MHuman Services$40kRecreation & Sports$33kCivil Rights$18kFood & Nutrition$17kArts & Culture$17kHousing & Shelter$10k
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $825k
$22,604
Median grant
3
States reached
$41M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Warren School District$100,000
Manchester School District$100,000
Newport School District$100,000
Lisbon School District - SAU 35$97,000
Nashua School District$90,000
Littleton School District$84,300
Berlin School District - SAU 3$83,000
Northumberland School District - SAU 58$69,484
UNH Foundation Inc$51,500
White Mountain Regional School District SAU 36$50,000
Lilypad Clinical Change$22,604
Milan School District - SAU 20$21,272
Keene Perspectives PLLC$18,000
Gersh Autism$13,250
Conway School District - SAU 9$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%Gersh Autism: $13k → 7%Keene Perspectives PLLC: $18k → 9%Keene Housing Kids Collaborative: $10k → 9%Lilypad Clinical Change: $23k → 9%Conway School District - SAU 9: $10k → 9%Newport School District: $100k → 10%Warren School District: $100k → 10%Berlin School District - SAU 3: $83k → 13%Gersh Autism: $11k → 7%Nottingham School District: $10k → 5%Concord Community Music School: $9k → 7%Reach Preschool - Rochester School District: $9k → 9%Newport School District: $30k → 10%Warren School District: $100k → 10%Berlin School District - SAU 3: $14k → 13%Crotched Mountain Rehabilitation Center Inc: $34k → 7%Lilipad Clinicqual Change: $10k → 9%Warren School District: $45k → 10%Pediatric Therapy Center: $11k → 5%Crotched Mountain Rehabilitation Center Inc: $19.6M → 7%UNH Foundation Inc: $52k → 9%Lisbon School District - SAU 35: $97k → 10%Northumberland School District - SAU 58: $69k → 13%Crotched Mountain Rehabilitation Center Inc: $7.7M → 7%Lisbon School District - SAU 35: $97k → 10%Northumberland School District - SAU 58: $69k → 13%New Hampshire Assistive Technology Center: $3.9M → 7%Littleton School District: $84k → 10%Northumberland School District: $50k → 13%Crotched Mountain Rehabilitation Center Inc: $743k → 7%Littleton School District: $65k → 10%White Mountain Regional School District SAU 36: $50k → 13%Crotched Mountain Rehabilitation Center Inc: $619k → 7%Lisbon School District: $50k → 10%White Mountain Regional School District SAU 36: $50k → 13%Crotched Mountain Rehabilitation Center Inc: $402k → 7%Adaptive Sports Partners of the no Country: $23k → 10%White Mountains Regional School District: $48k → 13%Crotched Mountain Community Care Inc: $22k → 7%Adaptive Sports Partners of the No Country: $10k → 10%Sunnyfield Farms Inc: $17k → 7%Manchester School District: $100k → 7%Crotched Mountain Community Care Inc: $12k → 7%Manchester Community Music School: $8k → 7%Manchester School District: $100k → 7%New Hampshire Assistive Technology Center: $8k → 7%Nashua School District: $92k → 7%Nashua School District: $90k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$35M · 19 repeat orgs$409k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
9

Total granted

$35M
$205k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
0%

Still filing today

16%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $204k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsArts & CultureEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    New Hampshire Assistive Technology Center
    2× · 2018–2019 · $3.9M · revenue +41% · 94% of their budget
  • CM
    Crotched Mountain Community Care Inc
    3× · 2017–2023 · $34k · revenue +99%
  • AS
    ADAPTIVE SPORTS PARTNERS OF NORTH COUNTRY INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $33k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • NS
    Northumberland School District
    2× · 2022–2023 · $50k
  • LS
    Lisbon School District
    2× · 2022–2023 · $50k
  • WM
    White Mountains Regional School District
    2× · 2022–2023 · $48k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Crotched Mountain Foundation

The Crotched Mountain Foundation is the parent organization of the affiliated programs of Crotched Mountain which creates opportunities for children and adults with disabilities and chronic conditions to live, learn and thrive in their own…

Human Services
2
Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
3
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
4
Catholic Medical Center

The heart of Catholic Medical Center is to carry out Christ's healing ministry by offering health, healing, and hope to every individual who seeks our care.

Health
5
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
6
Monadnock Community Hospital

Monadnock Community Hospital is committed to improving the health and well-being of our community. We will elevate the health of our community by providing accessible, high quality and value based care.

Health
7
Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative, Inc. will ensure access to quality care within the communities in which our patients live, provide local and high quality care with positive outcomes to our patients in Coos County while…

—
8
The Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester Inc

To provide mental health services for persons in the Greater Manchester, NH area.

—
9
Mountain Village Charter School

Mountain Village is a public Nature-based, Montessori school, engaging students in experiences that integrate natural environments with the Montessori curriculum, igniting achievement in academic, social-emotional and physical development.

Education
10
Manchester Mental Health Foundation

To raise and maintain funds to support mental health care for persons in the Greater Manchester, NH area.

Health
11
Concord Area Trust for Community Housing

Catch's mission is to strengthen our communities by creating opportunities for permanently affordable, quality housing for people otherwise not being served.

Housing & Shelter
12
Northeast Kingdom Council on Aging Inc

We support people age 60 and older persons with disabilities in their efforts to remain active healthy, financially secure, and in control of their own lives. The Agency connects people and the services they they need to live independently…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crotched Mountain Community Care Inc; the most unlike its peers is New Hampshire Assistive Technology Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Crotched Mountain Rehabilitation Center: $29,100,433 · HealthCrotched Mountain Rehabilitation CenterNew Hampshire Assistive Technology Center: $3,876,542 · OtherNew Hampshire Assi…Manchester School District: $200,000 · OtherLisbon School District - SAU 35: $194,000 · Other+26 more: $1,355,847 · Other+26 moreUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $151,500 · EducationADAPTIVE SPORTS PARTNERS OF NORTH COUNTRY INC: $32,500 · Recreation & SportsCONCORD COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL: $16,757 · Arts & CultureKEENE HOUSING KIDS COLLABORATIVE: $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Health$29,100,433Other$5,626,389Education$151,500Recreation & Sports$32,500Arts & Culture$16,757Crime & Legal$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCrotched Mountain Rehabilitation Center: $29,100,433 over 6y, 50% of budgetNew Hampshire Assistive Technology Center: $3,876,542 over 2y, 94% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $151,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCrotched Mountain Community Care Inc: $34,233 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetADAPTIVE SPORTS PARTNERS OF NORTH COUNTRY INC: $32,500 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetCONCORD COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL: $16,757 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetKEENE HOUSING KIDS COLLABORATIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetMANCHESTER COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL: $8,129 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Granite Young Men's Christian Association: $5,325 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Crotched Mountain Rehabilitation Center ↗
  • Who funds New Hampshire Assistive Technology Center ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Crotched Mountain Community Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds ADAPTIVE SPORTS PARTNERS OF NORTH COUNTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Sunnyfield Farms Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONCORD COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds KEENE HOUSING KIDS COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds MANCHESTER COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds The Granite Young Men's Christian Association ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crotched Mountain Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crotched Mountain Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Crotched Mountain’s filings →

    More from the funding graph