· Public charity
Crotched Mountain Foundation
The Crotched Mountain Foundation is the parent organization of the affiliated programs of Crotched Mountain which creates opportunities for children and adults with disabilities and chronic conditions to live, learn and thrive in their own communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $115k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $825k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Manchester School District | $100,000 |
| Warren School District | $100,000 |
| Newport School District | $100,000 |
| Lisbon School District - SAU 35 | $97,000 |
| Nashua School District | $90,000 |
| Littleton School District | $84,300 |
| Berlin School District - SAU 3 | $83,000 |
| Northumberland School District - SAU 58 | $69,484 |
| UNH Foundation Inc | $51,500 |
| White Mountain Regional School District SAU 36 | $50,000 |
| Lilypad Clinical Change | $22,604 |
| Milan School District - SAU 20 | $21,272 |
| Keene Perspectives PLLC | $18,000 |
| Gersh Autism | $13,250 |
| Conway School District - SAU 9 | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $204k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NHNew Hampshire Assistive Technology Center2× · 2018–2019 · $3.9M · revenue +41% · 94% of their budget
- CMCrotched Mountain Community Care Inc3× · 2017–2023 · $34k · revenue +99%
- CCCONCORD COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL2× · 2024–2025 · $17k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- NSNorthumberland School District2× · 2022–2023 · $50k
- LSLisbon School District2× · 2022–2023 · $50k
- WMWhite Mountains Regional School District2× · 2022–2023 · $48k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Crotched Mountain Foundation is the parent organization of the affiliated programs of Crotched Mountain which creates opportunities for children and adults with disabilities and chronic conditions to live, learn and thrive in their own…
The heart of Catholic Medical Center is to carry out Christ's healing ministry by offering health, healing, and hope to every individual who seeks our care.
Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.
Monadnock Community Hospital is committed to improving the health and well-being of our community. We will elevate the health of our community by providing accessible, high quality and value based care.
Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative, Inc. will ensure access to quality care within the communities in which our patients live, provide local and high quality care with positive outcomes to our patients in Coos County while…
To provide mental health services for persons in the Greater Manchester, NH area.
Mountain Village is a public Nature-based, Montessori school, engaging students in experiences that integrate natural environments with the Montessori curriculum, igniting achievement in academic, social-emotional and physical development.
To raise and maintain funds to support mental health care for persons in the Greater Manchester, NH area.
Catch's mission is to strengthen our communities by creating opportunities for permanently affordable, quality housing for people otherwise not being served.
We support people age 60 and older persons with disabilities in their efforts to remain active healthy, financially secure, and in control of their own lives. The Agency connects people and the services they they need to live independently…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crotched Mountain Community Care Inc and the most unlike its peers is New Hampshire Assistive Technology Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Crotched Mountain Rehabilitation Center ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Assistive Technology Center ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Crotched Mountain Community Care Inc ↗
- Who funds ADAPTIVE SPORTS PARTNERS OF NORTH COUNTRY INC ↗
- Who funds Sunnyfield Farms Inc ↗
- Who funds CONCORD COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds KEENE HOUSING KIDS COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds MANCHESTER COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds The Granite Young Men's Christian Association ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Crotched Mountain Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.