Skip to content

· Public charity

Crescent Project Inc

Our mission is to inspire, encourage and equip the local church to share the love of jesus with muslims in word and deed.

$68k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$84kInternational$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kCivil Rights$14kFood & Nutrition$10kPhilanthropy$7k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $65,235, the rows itemized in this filing. The $68,032 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,797 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $52k
$11,189
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSION INDIA$24,000
BENGAL CREATIVE MEDIA LLC$16,660
LEVANT MINISTRIES INC$11,189
NEO LEADERS$7,792
UNCHARTED MINISTRIES$5,594
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 47% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%NEO LEADERS: $8k → 10%ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS: $6k → 16%LEVANT MINISTRIES INC: $11k → 11%BENGAL CREATIVE MEDIA LLC: $17k → 12%PIONEERS INC: $7k → 13%CONVOY OF HOPE: $10k → 15%MISSION INDIA: $24k → 9%OPERATION MOBILIZATION: $14k → 6%FRONT RANGE BIBLE INSTITUTE: $7k → 9%NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION OF: $7k → 16%NEO LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $20k → 17%WORLD HORIZONS EXPEDITIONS INC: $10k → 22%MISSION INDIA: $24k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IN
OH
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

—
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
Mio Frontiers

Church planting among the least evangelized peoples of the world through recruiting, training, sending, and serving field workers.

Religion
4
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
5
Josiah Venture

To equip young leaders throughout Central and Eastern Europe to fulfill Christ's commission through the local church.

Religion
6
Christian World Outreach

Providing responsible evangelism, leadership, development, and humanitarian assistance.

Employment
7
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
8
Redeemer Dubai

Redeemer Dubai provides financial support for churches and church planting activities across the Middle East region

Religion
9
Development Assoc International

Enhancing the integrity and effectiveness of Christian leaders worldwide so that the Church can fulfill its role in extending the Kingdom of God.

Religion
10
Ason International Inc

Assisting national Christian leaders around the world.

Human Services
11
I58 Global

i58 Global is a Christian ministry dedicated to recruiting, sending and organizing relief workers to provide aid and share hope to refugees in various European countries.

Human Services
12
Seeds of Hope

Seeds of Hope works with local citizens and charities to bring long-term change to impoverished communities in the Middle East through education, economic development, cultural exchange, and humanitarian aid.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope; the most unlike its peers is Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISSION INDIA: $48,000 · OtherMISSION INDIABENGAL CREATIVE MEDIA LLC: $16,660 · OtherBENGAL CREATIVE MEDIA LLCOPERATION MOBILIZATION: $14,200 · OtherOPERATION MOBILIZATIONHORIZONS EXPEDITIONS: $10,000 · OtherHORIZONS EXPEDITIONSFRONT RANGE BIBLE INSTITUTE: $6,833 · OtherFRONT RANGE BIBLE INSTITUTEPIONEERS: $6,833 · OtherPIONEERSUNCHARTED MINISTRIES: $5,594 · OtherNEO LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $20,000 · ReligionNEO LEADERSHIP FOUNDATIO…LEVANT MINISTRIES INC: $11,189 · ReligionLEVANT MINISTRIES INCNEAR EAST ORGANIZATION INC: $7,792 · ReligionNEAR EAST ORGANIZATION I…CONVOY OF HOPE: $10,000 · InternationalCONVOY OF HOPEIRANIAN CHRISTIANS INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 · InternationalIRANIAN CHRISTIA…ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $6,000 · InternationalALLEGRO ORGANIZA…NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC: $7,256 · Philanthropy
Other$108,120Religion$38,981International$26,000Philanthropy$7,256

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEO LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetLEVANT MINISTRIES INC: $11,189 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetIRANIAN CHRISTIANS INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetHORIZONS EXPEDITIONS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNEAR EAST ORGANIZATION INC: $7,792 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC: $7,256 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crescent Project Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crescent Project Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Crescent Project Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Crescent Project Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Crescent Project’s filings →

    More from the funding graph