Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cremer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$362k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$643kEducation$482kYouth Development$246kHealth$173kHousing & Shelter$150kFood & Nutrition$100kEmployment$85kArts & Culture$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $297k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAYVIEW FOUNDATION$50,000
OPERATION FRESH START$40,000
BRIARPATCH YOUTH SERVICES$35,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$35,000
SUN PRAIRIE EAST HIGH SCHOOL$32,000
THE RIVER FOOD PANTRY$30,000
SUNSHINE PLACE$25,000
GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER$25,000
EAST MADISON COMMUNITY CENTER$20,000
GIFT TO UNITYPOINT HEALTH MERITER FOUNDA$15,000
CREMER FOUNDATION INC$10,000
YWCA$10,000
SPECIALTY CARE FREE CLINIC$10,000
HORIZON HIGH SCHOOL OF MADISON$10,000
FIRST TEE SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $383k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YWCA USA INC: $30k → 14%SOLACE FRIENDS: $10k → 10%GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 10%GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 10%GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 10%GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 10%EAST MADISON COMMUNITY CENTER: $20k → 10%EAST MADISON COMMUNITY CENTER: $20k → 10%EAST MADISON COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $15k → 10%EAST MADISON COMMUNITY CENTER: $14k → 10%EAST MADISON COMMUNITY CENTER: $14k → 10%SUNSHINE PLACE INC: $30k → 10%DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $10k → 10%DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $5k → 10%SUNSHINE PLACE: $25k → 10%YWCA MADISON: $40k → 10%ONE CITY SCHOOLS: $50k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 24 repeat orgs$452k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
18

Total granted

$1.6M
$382k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
0%

Still filing today

67%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationCrime & LegalPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BY
    BRIARPATCH YOUTH SERVICES INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $161k · revenue +29%
  • IA
    IRWIN A AND ROBERT D GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $100k · revenue +12%
  • MADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $90k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • OC
    ONE CITY SCHOOLS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +47%
  • OC
    ONE CITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -65%
  • TC
    THE COLONIAL CLUB
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Madison Professional Police Officers Association Inc

The madison professional police officers association represents law enforcement professionals who serve the city of madison, wisconsin, as either police officers, detectives, investigators, or sergeants.

—
2
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
3
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
4
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
5
Wisconsin School Counselor Association Inc

Our vision is for wisconsin to be the model for excellence in equitable school counseling practice, exemplified by the advocacy, leadership, and expertise of the members of the wsca.

—
6
Dane County Parent Council Inc

Dane county parent council changes the lives of underserved children and families through education and supportive services.

Education
7
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—
8
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
9
Downtown Madison Inc

Make downtown madison an economically strong, equitable, inclusive, and vibrant place to live, work, and visit.

—
10
Cap Services Inc

Cap services, inc.'s mission is to transform people and communities to advance social and economic justice.

Human Services
11
Mid-Iowa Community Action Inc

Mica helps families experencing poverty meet their needs, build on their strengths, and achieve their goals.

Community Improvement
12
Pathways of Wisconsin Inc

Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is CHAMPIONS4KIDS Inc; the most unlike its peers is Domestic Abuse Intervention Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BAYVIEW FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · OtherBAYVIEW FOUNDATION INCTHE SALVATION ARMY: $140,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYSUN PRAIRIE EAST HIGH SCHOOL: $113,250 · OtherSUN PRAIRIE EAST HIGH SCHOOLOPERATION FRESH START: $70,000 · OtherOPERATION FRESH STARTYWCA: $65,000 · OtherYWCAGOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER FOR GIRLS: $65,000 · OtherGOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER FOR GIRLSDAIS: $61,000 · OtherDAISSUN PRARIE HIGH SCHOOL: $60,000 · OtherSUN PRARIE HIGH SCHOOLTHE COLONIAL CLUB: $50,000 · Other+24 more: $327,921 · Other+24 moreIRWIN A AND ROBERT D GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesIRWIN A AND ROBERT D…EAST MADISON COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $83,000 · Human ServicesEAST MADISON COMMUNI…SUNSHINE PLACE INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesSUNSHINE PLACE INCONE CITY SCHOOLS INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesONE CITY SCHOOLS INCYWCA MADISON INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesYWCA MADISON INCYWCA USA INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesYWCA USA INCDOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC: $15,000 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesMADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 · EducationMADISON AR…ONE CITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EducationONE CITY S…HORIZON HIGH SCHOOL OF MADISON INC: $45,000 · EducationHORIZON HI…BRIARPATCH YOUTH SERVICES INC: $161,000 · Crime & LegalTHE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INC: $85,000 · Food & NutritionOPERATION FRESH START INC: $85,000 · EmploymentMERITER FOUNDATION INC: $72,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,102,171Human Services$383,000Education$185,000Crime & Legal$161,000Food & Nutrition$85,000Employment$85,000Philanthropy$72,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRIARPATCH YOUTH SERVICES INC: $161,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetBAYVIEW FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetIRWIN A AND ROBERT D GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INC: $85,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION FRESH START INC: $85,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetEAST MADISON COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $83,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetMERITER FOUNDATION INC: $72,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSUNSHINE PLACE INC: $55,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetONE CITY SCHOOLS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetONE CITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHORIZON HIGH SCHOOL OF MADISON INC: $45,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetYWCA MADISON INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetYWCA USA INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIALTY CARE FREE CLINIC INC: $25,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER MADISON INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHAMPIONS4KIDS INC: $20,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR BLACK WOMEN'S WELLNESS INC: $16,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetDOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSolace Friends Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetOMEGA SCHOOL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRIARPATCH YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BAYVIEW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds IRWIN A AND ROBERT D GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION FRESH START INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST MADISON COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MERITER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNSHINE PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE CITY SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE CITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HORIZON HIGH SCHOOL OF MADISON INC ↗
  • Who funds YWCA MADISON INC ↗
  • Who funds YWCA USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIALTY CARE FREE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER MADISON INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAMPIONS4KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR BLACK WOMEN'S WELLNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Solace Friends Inc ↗
  • Who funds OMEGA SCHOOL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Madison Gas and Electric Foundation IncWI48.9× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Madison Gas and Electric Foundation Inc · Madison Community Foundation · The Evjue Foundation Inc · United Way of Dane County Inc · The Roots and Wings Foundation Inc · Sub-Zero Group Foundation Inc · Trustage Foundation Inc · Ascendium Education Solutions Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · The Oscar Rennebohm Foundation Inc · Veridian Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cremer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cremer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cremer Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Cremer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cremer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph