Skip to content

· Private foundation

Craig and Wendy Spoelhof Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$180k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$641kYouth Development$161kReligion$153kPhilanthropy$80kFood & Nutrition$75kHuman Services$71kInternational$61kHousing & Shelter$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS$100,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$25,000
FELLOWSHIP CHURCH$15,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HOLLAND ZEELAND$10,000
POTTERS HOUSE$5,000
MISSION PARTNERS INDIA$5,000
WINNING AT HOME$2,000
PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE$2,000
Mary Free Bed Foundation$2,000
GENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER$1,800
Culture Works$1,500
HOMECOR$1,500
Positive Options$1,000
Special Olympics$1,000
CALVIN UNIVERSITY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMPASSIONATE HEART MINISTRIES: $3k → 8%COMPASSIONATE HEART MINISTRIES: $3k → 8%COMPASSIONATE HEART MINISTRIES: $3k → 8%COMPASSIONATE HEART MINISTRIES: $1k → 8%JUBILEE MINISTRIES: $2k → 10%JUBILEE MINISTRIES: $2k → 10%ENCOMPASS KIDS: $1k → 10%ENCOMPASS KIDS: $1k → 10%ENCOMPASS KIDS: $1k → 10%JUBILEE MINISTRIES: $1k → 10%ENCOMPASS KIDS: $1k → 10%ENCOMPASS KIDS: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 30 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
15

Total granted

$1.2M
$74k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
-7%

Still filing today

53%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationReligionRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HOLLAND CHRISTIAN EDUCATION SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $527k · revenue +85%
  • KF
    KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $75k · revenue +44%
  • GC
    GENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER
    6× · 2017–2025 · $59k · revenue +135%

Funded once

  • HC
    HOPE COLLEGE CAMPUS MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2019 · $30k
  • PH
    POTTERS HOUSE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • HC
    HARBOR CHURCHES
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
2
Landmark Christian School

Landmark christian school partners with christian families by equipping college-bound students to embrace a christ-centered worldview, grow as servant leaders, and steward god's unique purpose for their lives.

—
3
Global Scholars

Global scholars exists so that christian academics are adequately equipped to have a redemptive influence among their students, colleagues, universities and disciplines, at a reasonable cost.

—
4
Lansing Christian School

Recognizing god as the source of all truth, wisdom, and knowledge, lansing christian school partners with christian parents to educate children to the full extent of their god-given abilities. we engage students in an academically…

—
5
Heights Christian Schools

To lead children and their families into a relationship with jesus christ,equipping them in heart and mind to influence the world for god's kingdom.

Education
6
Cornerstone Christian Schools

Cornerstone christian school educates children to become learners-equipped with godly character and biblical truth.

Education
7
Gospel Inc

To develop community with the formerly homeless. to offer services to the formerly homeless regardless of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or religious affiliation. to share the love of god with all people we come into contact with.

Human Services
8
Valley Christian School

Valley christian school exists to partner with christian families who desire educational excellence, taught through a biblical worldview, so their children will be prepared for a lifetime of faithfulness and service to jesus christ.

—
9
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
10
Advent House Ministries Inc

To provide a ministry in the form of services to the poor and disadvantaged people of the lansing area.

—
11
Hospice of Holland Inc

The mission of hospice of holland is to provide the most compassionate and highest quality end-of-life care through physical, emotional, and spiritual support.

Human Services
12
St Luke's School

A coeducational episcopal day school, preschool through eighth grade, for students of all faiths.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Holland Christian Education Society; the most unlike its peers is Odc Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
17/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLLAND CHRISTIAN EDUCATION SOCIETY: $526,500 · OtherHOLLAND CHRISTIAN EDUCATION SOCIETYBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $126,137 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HOLLAND ZEELAND: $80,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HOLLAND ZEELANDWINNING AT HOME: $33,500 · OtherFELLOWSHIP CHURCH: $33,000 · Other+32 more: $157,200 · Other+32 moreGENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER: $58,800 · ReligionGENEVA CAM…MISSION PARTNERS INDIA INC: $57,500 · ReligionMISSION PA…The Potters House: $50,000 · EducationThe Potte…HOPE COLLEGE: $35,500 · EducationHOPE COLL…CALVIN UNIVERSITY: $28,500 · EducationCALVIN UN…KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC: $75,000 · Food & NutritionYOUNG LIFE: $22,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMPASSIONATE HEART MINISTRIES: $8,500 · Human ServicesENCOMPASSKIDS: $5,000 · Human ServicesJUBILEE MINISTRIES INC: $4,500 · Human ServicesVOX UNITED: $3,000 · Human ServicesCULTUREWORKS: $12,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$956,337Religion$116,300Education$114,000Food & Nutrition$75,000Youth Development$22,000Human Services$21,000Arts & Culture$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOLLAND CHRISTIAN EDUCATION SOCIETY: $526,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER: $58,800 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMISSION PARTNERS INDIA INC: $57,500 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetThe Potters House: $50,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE COLLEGE: $35,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCALVIN UNIVERSITY: $28,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $22,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCULTUREWORKS: $12,500 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetLAKE MICHIGAN JUNIOR GOLF ASSOCIATION: $11,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCOMPASSIONATE HEART MINISTRIES: $8,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetODC NETWORK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetENCOMPASSKIDS: $5,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetJUBILEE MINISTRIES INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetVOX UNITED: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHEIGHTS OF HOPE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetLAKESHORE PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOMECOR: $3,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR TRANSPLANTS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVAN ANDEL INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOLLAND CHRISTIAN EDUCATION SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC ↗
  • Who funds GENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MISSION PARTNERS INDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Potters House ↗
  • Who funds HOPE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CALVIN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds CULTUREWORKS ↗
  • Who funds LAKE MICHIGAN JUNIOR GOLF ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSIONATE HEART MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ODC NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds ENCOMPASSKIDS ↗
  • Who funds JUBILEE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds VOX UNITED ↗
  • Who funds HEIGHTS OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKESHORE PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMECOR ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area IncMI38.5× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · John and Judy Spoelhof Foundation · Edgar and Elsa Prince Foundation · Stephen and Valerie Spoelhof Foundation · Jim and Ginger Jurries Foundation · Douglas & Sandra Dekock Family Foun · De Witt Families Conduit Foundation · Scott and Janet Spoelhof Foundation · Larry and Karen Mulder Foundation · Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Howard Miller Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Craig and Wendy Spoelhof Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Craig and Wendy Spoelhof Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Craig and Wendy Spoelhof Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Craig and Wendy Spoelhof Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Craig and Wendy Spoelhof’s filings →

    More from the funding graph