Skip to content

· Public charity

Council on Regional Economic Expansion & Educational Dev Corp

To facilitate the formation and development of a strategically sustainablehighly skilled regional workforce with emphasis on hispanic demographic andeconomy capable of meeting market demand and competition for the greaterpaso del norte region in southwest texas, southern new mexico, and theadjacent international boundary with mexico.

$100k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.7MPhilanthropy$400kCommunity Improvement$136kEmployment$100kPublic Benefit$30k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$296k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BURNHAM WOOD CHARTER SCHOOLS$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS LLC: $400k → 14%KIPP ACADEMY: $72k → 16%BURNHAM WOOD CHARTER SCHOOLS: $150k → 21%BURNHAM WOOD CHARTER SCHOOLS: $100k → 21%CANUTILLO ISD: $450k → 21%CANUTILLO ISD: $150k → 21%CANUTILLO ISD: $76k → 21%CANUTILLO ISD: $43k → 21%CANUTILLO ISD: $10k → 21%CANUTILLO ISD: $9k → 21%EDUMOBILE INC: $8k → 21%STTE FOUNDATION: $100k → 21%STTE FOUNDATION: $100k → 21%COMMUNITY EN ACCION: $36k → 21%ANTHONY ISD: $6k → 21%SOCORRO ISD: $150k → 21%SOCORRO ISD: $76k → 21%CLINT ISD: $25k → 21%CLINT ISD: $25k → 21%CLINT ISD: $22k → 21%YISD: $126k → 21%EL PASO ISD: $100k → 21%EL PASO ISD: $36k → 21%EL PASO ISD: $23k → 21%FABENS ISD: $20k → 21%EL PASO MATTERS INC: $30k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 5 repeat orgs$448k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
9

Total granted

$1.4M
$448k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+35%

Still filing today

20%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CANUTILLO ISD
    5× · 2017–2023 · $738k
  • EP
    EL PASO EDUCATION INITIATIVE INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $250k · revenue +60%
  • SI
    SOCORRO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
    2× · 2017–2019 · $226k

Funded once

  • YI
    YSLETA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2019 · $126k
  • SF
    STTE Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue ×25
  • KI
    KIPP Inc dba Knowledge is Power Program Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $72k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CANUTILLO ISD: $737,623 · OtherCANUTILLO ISDSOCORRO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $226,000 · OtherSOCORRO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTEl Paso Indep School District: $159,000 · OtherEl Paso Indep School DistrictYSLETA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $126,420 · OtherYSLETA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTKIPP Inc dba Knowledge is Power Program Inc: $72,000 · OtherClint Independent School District: $72,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO: $50,000 · Other+3 more: $34,000 · OtherCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $400,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES FOUNDA…EL PASO EDUCATION INITIATIVE INC: $250,000 · EducationEL PASO EDUCATIO…STTE Foundation: $100,000 · EducationSTTE FoundationPaso del Norte Community Foundation: $100,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY EN ACCION: $36,000 · Community ImprovementEL PASO MATTERS INC: $30,000 · Public Benefit
Other$1,477,043Philanthropy$400,000Education$350,000Health$100,000Community Improvement$36,000Public Benefit$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $400,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEL PASO EDUCATION INITIATIVE INC: $250,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPaso del Norte Community Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKIPP Inc dba Knowledge is Power Program Inc: $72,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY EN ACCION: $36,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetEL PASO MATTERS INC: $30,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds EL PASO EDUCATION INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds STTE Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Paso del Norte Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds KIPP Inc dba Knowledge is Power Program Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY EN ACCION ↗
  • Who funds EL PASO MATTERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paso del Norte Health FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paso del Norte Health Foundation · El Paso Community Foundation · Paso del Norte Community Foundation · Project Lead the Way Inc · For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Council on Regional Economic Expansion & Educational Dev Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Council on Regional Economic Expansion & Educational Dev Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Council on Regional Economic Expansion & Educational Dev’s filings →

    More from the funding graph