· Public charity
Council of American Overseas Research Centers
The Council of American Overseas Research Centers (CAORC) is a private non-profit federation of independent overseas research centers that promotes research to advance knowledge of the world outside The United States in an era of global engagement.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 23 grants below total $4,471,931 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,691,717 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $219,786 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $79k
- $50k–250k17 grants · $2.5M
- $250k+4 grants · $1.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| West African Research Association | $704,314 |
| American Inst for Maghrib Studies | $561,149 |
| American Inst - Pakistan Studies | $325,606 |
| American Inst - Indian Studies | $305,552 |
| American Research Inst - Turkey | $228,500 |
| American Research Center in Egypt | $192,325 |
| American Inst - Iranian Studies | $185,039 |
| Mexico North Research Network | $185,000 |
| The Academic Research Inst - Iraq | $172,448 |
| American Center - Mongolian Studies | $170,936 |
| American Institute - Yemeni Studies | $167,315 |
| American Inst - Bangladesh Studies | $152,950 |
| Center for Khmer Studies CKS | $150,072 |
| WF Albright Inst - Archaeological | $150,000 |
| American Center - Oriental Research | $140,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 77% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
25 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AIAMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR MAGHRIB STUDIES6× · 2019–2024 · $2.7M · revenue +12% · 91% of their budget
- ARAMERICAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE IN TURKEY6× · 2019–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +83% · 34% of their budget
- TATHE AMERICAN CENTER OF RESEARCH INCORPORATED6× · 2019–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +80%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Asor, founded in 1900, is an international organization whose mission is to initiate, encourage, and support research into, and public understanding of, the history and cultures of the near east and wider mediterranean, from the earliest…
The middle east media research institute (memri) explores the middle east through its media, providing timely translations from arabic, farsi, urdu, pashtu, and turkish media and publishing original analysis of political, ideological,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Inst of Indian Studies and the most unlike its peers is Mexico-North Research Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WEST AFRICAN RESEARCH ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR MAGHRIB STUDIES ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE IN TURKEY ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN CENTER OF RESEARCH INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INST OF INDIAN STUDIES ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR YEMENI STUDIES ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PAKISTAN STUDIES ↗
- Who funds MEXICO-NORTH RESEARCH NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN RESEARCH CENTER IN EGYPT INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF IRANIAN STUDIES ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN ACADEMIC RESEARCH INST IN IRAQ (D/B/A TARII) ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF AFGHANISTAN STUDIES ↗
- Who funds THE WILLIAM FOXWELL ALBRIGHT INSTIT OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH IN JERUS ↗
- Who funds PALESTINIAN AMERICAN RESEARCH CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Amer Research Inst of the South Cauc ↗
- Who funds CYPRUS AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF SRI LANKAN STUDIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR KHMER STUDIES INC ↗
- Who funds American Center for Mongolian Studies ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INSTITUTE BANGLADESH STU ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR INDONESIAN STUDIES ↗
- Who funds TANGIER AMERICAN LEGATION INSTITUTE FOR MOROCCAN STUDIES (TALIM) ↗
- Who funds INYA BURMA INSTITUTE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Council of American Overseas Research Centers funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- West African Research Association — 13% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.