Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cornerstone Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$5.6MRecreation & Sports$3.8MEducation$1.3MInternational$838kHuman Services$635kCommunity Improvement$500kHousing & Shelter$177kYouth Development$165kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $334k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$32,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP KANESATAKE$300,000
OPERATION RENEWED HOPE$200,000
Individual grant recipient$150,000
CAMP LOMA DEVIDA$150,000
Individual grant recipient$145,000
RED CLIFF BIBLE CAMP$124,000
BAY CITIES FELLOWSHIP$100,000
ABWE$82,700
BIBLICAL MINISTRIES WORLDWIDE$50,000
BETHANY CHURCH$45,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
BIBLICAL EDUCATION FOR LATIN AMERICA$32,000
ALL POINTS BAPTIST MISSION$30,000
WOODLANDS CAMP$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $485k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOPE CHILDREN'S HOME: $175k → 13%58TEN: $120k → 6%HOPE CHILDREN'S HOME: $40k → 13%HOPE CHILDREN'S HOME: $40k → 13%HOPE CHILDREN'S HOME: $40k → 13%HOPE CHILDREN'S HOME: $40k → 13%58TEN: $30k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
NH
WI
MI
NY
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
WV
AZ
TN
NC
SC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 46 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
25

Total granted

$12M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+28%

Still filing today

20%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $292k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CK
    CAMP KANESATAKE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $661k · revenue +147%
  • FB
    Faith Baptist Bible College
    2× · 2017–2021 · $450k · revenue +36%
  • HI
    Hope International Ministries Inc
    5× · 2018–2022 · $335k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • BI
    BJU INC
    one grant, 2017 · $500k
  • CB
    CROSSWAY BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $250k
  • IB
    INTERNATIONAL BAPTIST COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $130k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Worldcast Ministries

Publishing, writing, sales & distribution of Christian Books; speaking throughout the US and foreign countries on Christian subjects. Attending orphanages, Christian schools and Bible colleges in the US and foreign countries assisting in…

Religion
2
Hope Outreach International Ministries

Evangelizing the lost through gospel crusades, camps and conferences; Empowering orphans and widows and those in need through Christ-centered vocational training; and Equipping ministers of the gospel through Christian seminars and…

Religion
3
Life Camp Ministries Inc
Youth Development
4
King Ministries International

To spread the Gospel of Jesus the Christ

Religion
5
Overseas Campus Ministries Inc

To preach and propogate the gospel of jesus christ in the united states and throughout the world, to provide christian literature and training materials through various forms of media, and to offer christian leadership and discipleship…

Religion
6
Koyukon Camp Ministries Inc

Kokrine Hills Bible Camp is a Christ-centered Bilble camp focused on reaching young people in interior Alaska with the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Religion
7
Choice Ministries Inc

Christian university campus ministry both inside & outside of the united states. provides worship, biblical teaching, training & mission opportunities. provides audio & visual materials to support the ministry.

—
8
Ambassadors for Christ International - Usa Inc

Ambassadors for Christ International - USA is a fellowship of gospel preachers and teachers whose mission is to preach Christ, edify the Church, and to glorify God and serve as a catalyst for revival, evangelism, and training of Christians…

Religion
9
Bible Camping Inc

Bible Camping, Inc. is a missions-based camping ministry existing to lovingly confront each camper with his or her need of a personal relationship with Jesus Christ in salvation and to encourage each one to a life of obedience and service…

—
10
Hope Christian Ministries International

Ministries

Religion
11
Arrow Creek International Ministrie Stands Over Bull
Religion
12
Gospel Crusade Ministries Inc
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southland Christian Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Auto Racing Outreach Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAMP LOMA DEVIDA: $1,030,000 · OtherCAMP LOMA DEVIDABIBLICAL MINISTRIES WORLDWIDE INC: $870,900 · OtherBIBLICAL MINISTRIES WORLDWIDE INCIndividual grant recipient: $621,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $546,500 · OtherOPERATION RENEWED HOPE: $537,700 · OtherBJU INC: $500,000 · OtherHIGH POINT BAPTIST CHAPEL: $454,906 · OtherWEST SIDE BAPTIST CHURCH: $400,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $397,000 · Other+53 more: $5,782,655 · Other+53 moreCAMP KANESATAKE: $661,000 · Recreation & SportsWILDS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsFaith Baptist Bible College: $450,000 · EducationSOUTHLAND CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC: $150,125 · EducationOREMUNDO INC: $88,000 · EducationHope International Ministries Inc: $335,000 · Human Services58TEN INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesBUILDING GREAT LEADERS INC: $220,894 · ReligionA DOOR OF HOPE INC: $87,500 · ReligionAUTO RACING OUTREACH INC: $50,500 · ReligionGALKIN EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES: $25,000 · ReligionKINGDOM AIR CORPS: $125,000 · Arts & CultureVision Atlanta Inc: $4,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$11,141,061Recreation & Sports$761,000Education$688,125Human Services$485,000Religion$383,894Arts & Culture$125,000Crime & Legal$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAMP KANESATAKE: $661,000 over 7y, 20% of budgetFaith Baptist Bible College: $450,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetHope International Ministries Inc: $335,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetBUILDING GREAT LEADERS INC: $220,894 over 7y, 30% of budgetSOUTHLAND CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC: $150,125 over 7y, 7.2% of budget58TEN INC: $150,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetAPPALACHIAN BIBLE COLLEGE INC: $138,970 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetKINGDOM AIR CORPS: $125,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetWILDS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetOREMUNDO INC: $88,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetA DOOR OF HOPE INC: $87,500 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetGALKIN EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES: $25,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetBIBLE VISUALS INTERNATIONAL INC: $13,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetVision Atlanta Inc: $4,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAMP KANESATAKE ↗
  • Who funds Faith Baptist Bible College ↗
  • Who funds Hope International Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING GREAT LEADERS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHLAND CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds 58TEN INC ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN BIBLE COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds KINGDOM AIR CORPS ↗
  • Who funds MISSION FOR HAITI INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO23.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Seed Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Servant Foundation · Eden Bridge Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cornerstone Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cornerstone Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cornerstone Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Cornerstone Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cornerstone’s filings →

    More from the funding graph