Skip to content

· Private foundation

CORE Construction Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$295kEducation$218kCivil Rights$50kYouth Development$30kArts & Culture$3k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$729k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Illinois State University Foundation$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 17% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%NEXT GENERATION ACTION NETWORK: $50k → 14%LINCOLN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%PEORIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $3k → 14%EDUCATE 35: $3k → 15%MILLIKIN UNIVERSITY: $20k → 15%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PEORIA: $25k → 14%MILLIKIN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 15%EASTERSEALS CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $42k → 14%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER PEORIA: $5k → 14%BRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $35k → 14%BRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $15k → 14%BRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $15k → 14%OSF HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $250k → 14%OSF HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$463k · 4 repeat orgs$132k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$463k
$132k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+8%

Still filing today

100%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    OSF Healthcare Foundation
    2× · 2020–2021 · $253k · revenue +63%
  • IS
    ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2024 · $115k · revenue +24%
  • BU
    BRADLEY UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $65k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • NG
    NEXT GENERATION ACTION NETWORK
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • EC
    EASTERSEALS CENTRAL ILLINOIS
    one grant, 2022 · $42k · revenue -7%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PEORIA
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
2
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
3
Rockford University

To educate men & women to lead responsible lives by means of a curriculum grounded in liberal arts learning and complemented and extended by professional and practical experience, through the total academic and co-curricular experience,…

Education
4
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
5
Simpson College

Through innovative learning opportunities, individual student attention, and an unwavering commitment to inclusive educational access, simpson college cultivates a diverse community of learners to lead lives of meaning and purpose.

Education
6
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
7
Grand View University

Engages, equips and empowers learners to explore their vocations, fulfill their potential and serve the world.

Education
8
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
9
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
10
Excelsior University

Excelsior University provides educational opportunity to adult learners with an emphasis on those historically underrepresented in higher education. The University meets students where they are - academically and geographically, offering…

Education
11
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
12
Madonna University

The mission of madonna university, a catholic and franciscan institution of higher learning, is to instill in its students christain humanistic values, intellectual inquiry, a respect for university and a committment to serving others…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Illinois State University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Lincoln University Aka Lincoln College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OSF Healthcare Foundation: $252,500 · HealthOSF Healthcare FoundationEASTERSEALS CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $42,000 · HealthEASTERSEALS CENTRAL ILLINOISILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $115,000 · EducationILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONBRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $65,000 · EducationBRADLEY UNIVERSITYMILLIKIN UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · EducationMILLIKIN UNIVERSITY+1 more: $5,000 · EducationNEXT GENERATION ACTION NETWORK: $50,000 · OtherNEXT GENERATIO…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PEORIA: $25,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS…+1 more: $2,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER PEORIA INC: $4,500 · Youth DevelopmentPEORIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $3,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$294,500Education$215,000Other$77,500Youth Development$4,500Arts & Culture$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOSF Healthcare Foundation: $252,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $115,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $65,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEASTERSEALS CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $42,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMILLIKIN UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN UNIVERSITY AKA LINCOLN COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEORIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Barton Family Foundation Dtd 4242013IL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Barton Family Foundation Dtd 4242013 · Peoria Area Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization CORE Construction Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from CORE Construction Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to CORE Construction Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to CORE Construction Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on CORE Construction’s filings →

    More from the funding graph