Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cooking Autism Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
57
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Youth Development$108kEducation$66kFood & Nutrition$41kHealth$3kReligion$3kHuman Services$752Recreation & Sports$500Philanthropy$310Other$0
02FY2025 · 57 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
7
States reached
$43k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RISING STAR CENTER$3,150
JACQUELINE HATCHER$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON$1,500
MATTEWS CENTER FOR VISUAL LEARNING$1,500
MARY WILLIAMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$1,500
ANNE E MONCURE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$1,300
Individual grant recipient$1,200
MASSAPONAX HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
PARKRIDGE ELEMENTARY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ALTERNATIVE PATHS$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
CHARLES COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$1,000
NEABSCO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 28% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ACCEPT EDUCATION COLLABORATIVE: $2k → 8%Melchers Early Childhood: $2k → 6%ROSA PARKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $2k → 7%KING GEORGE ELEMENTARY: $2k → 7%THE MARSHALL SCHOOL: $1k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON: $2k → 15%Parkridge Elementary: $2k → 6%NORTH STAFFORD HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 6%ANNE E MONCURE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $1k → 6%ANTHONY BURNS ES: $1k → 6%MATTEWS CENTER FOR VISUAL LEARNING: $2k → 7%ANTHONY BURNS ES: $1k → 6%MATTHEWS CENTER FOR VISUAL LEARNING: $1k → 7%ANTHONY BURNS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $1k → 6%KILBY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $2k → 7%CHARLES COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $2k → 8%MARUMSCO HILLS ELEMENTARY: $2k → 7%KILBY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $1k → 7%KILBY ELEMENTARY: $1k → 7%WILDERNESS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $2k → 8%WILDERNESS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $2k → 8%MARY WILLIAMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $2k → 7%GATEWAY ACADEMY: $3k → 8%MARY WILLIAMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $2k → 7%MARY WILLIAMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $2k → 7%Gateway Academy: $2k → 8%MARY WILLIAMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $2k → 7%FREDERICKSBURG REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $2k → 8%RISING STAR CENTER: $5k → 6%CONWAY ELEMENTARY PTA: $4k → 6%CONWAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $4k → 6%Conway Elementary: $4k → 6%RISING STAR CENTER: $3k → 6%STAFFORD HIGH: $2k → 6%JUBILEE VERA: $2k → 6%RISING STAR CENTER: $2k → 6%STAFFORD HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 6%RISING STAR CENTER: $2k → 6%CONWAY ELEMENTARY PTA: $1k → 6%CONWAY ELEMENTARY: $1k → 6%NORTHSTAR EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $5k → 6%NORTHSTAR EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $4k → 6%NORTHSTAR EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $3k → 6%NORTHSTAR EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $2k → 6%NORTH STAR EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $2k → 6%North Star Early Childhood Center: $2k → 6%MARGARET BRENT ELELENTARY SCHOOL: $1k → 6%JACQUELINE HATCHER: $2k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
MA
OH
PA
VA
MD
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$157k · 54 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +112% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

54 repeat relationships: 34 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
76

Total granted

$157k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+112%
0%

Still filing today

15%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthAnimalsFood & NutritionReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GA
    GATEWAY ACADEMY SERVICES
    5× · 2019–2025 · $6k · revenue +434%
  • CE
    Conway Elementary School PTA
    2× · 2018–2020 · $5k · revenue +115%
  • PR
    PARK RIDGE ELEMENTARY PTO
    4× · 2019–2025 · $4k · revenue +41% · 100% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • FR
    FREDERICKSBURG REGIONAL FOOD BANKgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +68%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Point Elementary School Pto

The PTO seeks to help build community among students and families through spirit days and special events throughout the year. The PTO also organizes events to help care for Stony Point teachers and staff in tangible ways. The Stony Point…

Philanthropy
2
Scotts Ridge Elementary School Pta

To support and enhance the educational experience of students by fostering cooperation between parents, teachers and school staff. The PTA provides volunteer and financial support for educational programs, classroom resources, school evens…

—
3
Middleburg Elementary School Pto

School support provided by parents and teachers.

Education
4
Reynolds Elementary School Pto

Supports Reynolds Elementary school, students, and teachers

Education
5
Robertsville Elementary School Pto

To enhance connections between school and home by encouraging parental involvement; enhance the educational experience by supporting academic and enrichment activities; improve the environment at the school with volunteers and financial…

Education
6
Payneville Elementary Pto

Improve educational opportunities for the students through support of the school, staff, and teachers

Education
7
Morrison Gordon Elementary Pto

Supporting classroom activities

Education
8
Henderson Elementary Parent-Teacher Organization

Parent Teacher Organization which provides support to students, teachers, and staff.

—
9
Chesapeake Science Point Elementary School Pto

To promote a partnership between home and school, serving as a forum for caregivers and educators to collaborate as we advocate for the needs of the children, families, faculty, and staff at CSPES.

Education
10
Discovery Pto

The mission of the Discovery Elementary PTO is to support our school, students and staff to create the best learning environment and experience for each and every child. Our goals include funding teacher classroom supply, classroom…

Education
11
Lakeview Elementary Pto

Support lakeview school parents

Health
12
Carrie Martin Pta

Supporting the teachers, staff and students of Carrie Martin Elementary School

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wilderness Elementary Pta; the most unlike its peers is Dixon Smith Middle School Pto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 153 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/24
Grantees still filing
13/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHSTAR EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $17,508 · OtherNORTHSTAR EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTERRISING STAR CENTER: $12,018 · OtherRISING STAR CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $7,674 · OtherMARY WILLIAMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $7,000 · Other+133 more: $156,047 · Other+133 moreGATEWAY ACADEMY SERVICES: $6,279 · EducationGATEWAY A…PARK RIDGE ELEMENTARY PTO: $4,429 · EducationPARK RIDG…MATTHEWS CENTER FOR VISUAL LEARNING: $2,800 · EducationMATTHEWS …MARGARET BRENT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO: $1,418 · EducationMARGARET …Hampton Oaks Elementary School PTO: $961 · Education+7 more: $3,025 · Education+7 moreFREDERICKSBURG REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $2,031 · Food & NutritionQUIET WATERS MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 · ReligionAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $45 · HealthFREDERICKSBURG REGIONAL SPCA: $40 · Animals
Other$200,247Education$18,912Food & Nutrition$2,031Religion$2,000Health$45Animals$40

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGATEWAY ACADEMY SERVICES: $6,279 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetPARK RIDGE ELEMENTARY PTO: $4,429 over 4y, 100% of budgetMATTHEWS CENTER FOR VISUAL LEARNING: $2,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFREDERICKSBURG REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $2,031 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUIET WATERS MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMARGARET BRENT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO: $1,418 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetLocust Grove Primary School PTA: $1,400 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetHampton Oaks Elementary School PTO: $961 over 2y, 16% of budgetDixon Smith Middle School PTO: $600 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetROCKY RUN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRAPPAHANNOCK AREA YMCA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRECONNECTIONS EDUCATION CENTER INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetH H POOLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PTO: $300 over 1y, 17% of budgetCUDDLES FOR CLEFTS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $45 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREDERICKSBURG REGIONAL SPCA: $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GATEWAY ACADEMY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Conway Elementary School PTA ↗
  • Who funds PARK RIDGE ELEMENTARY PTO ↗
  • Who funds WILDERNESS ELEMENTARY PTA ↗
  • Who funds MATTHEWS CENTER FOR VISUAL LEARNING ↗
  • Who funds Rosa Parks Elementary School PTO ↗
  • Who funds FREDERICKSBURG REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds QUIET WATERS MINISTRIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

William M Cage Library TrustVA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: William M Cage Library Trust · Community Foundation of the Rappahannock River Region Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cooking Autism Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cooking Autism Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Reconnections Education Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Cooking Autism Inc?

Find your warmest path to Cooking Autism Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 153 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cooking Autism’s filings →

More from the funding graph