· Public charity
Cook Native American Ministries Foundation
In response to the christian gospel, COOK NATIVE AMERICAN MINISTRIES FOUNDATION equips and empowers native americans to better serve their churches and communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $81k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GRANTS 5000 AND LESS | $81,469 |
| NATIVE AMERICAN URBAN MINISTRIES | $10,000 |
| UNITED NATIONAL INDIAN TRIBAL YOUTH | $7,500 |
| FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN | $6,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- G5GRANTS 5000 AND LESS2× · 2023–2024 · $116k
- SJST JOHN'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH2× · 2020–2022 · $20k
- NANATIVE AMERICAN URBAN MISSION2× · 2022–2024 · $20k
Funded once
- NSNATIVE STRENGTH REVOLUTION INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +142%
- RORIVER OF LIFE MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +21%
- KCKERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTERone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -58%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The american indian institute's mission is to perpetuate the ancient wisdom and cultural heritage of north america's native people and to promote a greater understanding of that wisdom amoung all people.
Provide foster parent training for native american child welfare workers.
Language program on indian reservation
Ministry to american indians
Fund Indigenous Nations Languate, Culture and Restoration Plans
The Cihuapactli Collective's purpose is to provide healing for urban Indigenous Peoples from the diaspora. This is done by sharing wisdom, connecting resources, revitalizing Traditional Knowledge, promoting and advocating for health &…
Dynamic Salish language revitalization powering cultural renewal and building a stronger, healthier community.
To promote healing, positive cultural identity, holistic wellness and connection among intergenerational indigenous women and our families by sharing our collective wisdom, traditions, wellness practices and stories. we focus on healing by…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Keres Children's Learning Center and the most unlike its peers is Pawss Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIVE STRENGTH REVOLUTION INC ↗
- Who funds RIVER OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds KERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds HEALING CIRCLE DROP IN CENTER ↗
- Who funds SENECA COMMUNITY CHAPLAIN CORP ↗
- Who funds HIPEEXNU KII U NUUN WISIIX ↗
- Who funds Three Precious Miracles Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED NATIONAL INDIAN TRIBAL YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds American Indian Services ↗
- Who funds LOWLANDER CENTER ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - HE SAPA ↗
- Who funds PAWSS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Common Counsel Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cook Native American Ministries Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Cook Native American Ministries Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Cook Native American Ministries Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.