Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cook Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$255kReligion$121kHuman Services$88kInternational$80kHealth$45kYouth Development$30kHousing & Shelter$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,200
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DECATUR HERITAGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$20,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $142k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NOT FORGOTTEN: $15k → 16%CIRCLE RANCH: $3k → 16%NOT FORGOTTEN: $15k → 16%CIRCLE RANCH: $3k → 16%NOT FORGOTTEN: $15k → 16%CIRCLE RANCH: $3k → 16%NOT FORGOTTEN: $15k → 16%CIRCLE RANCH: $2k → 16%NOT FORGOTTEN: $8k → 16%CIRCLE RANCH: $2k → 16%NOT FORGOTTEN: $8k → 16%NOT FORGOTTEN: $5k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER: $10k → 13%NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER: $10k → 13%NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER: $10k → 13%NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER: $10k → 13%NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER: $5k → 13%NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$545k · 11 repeat orgs$100k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$545k
$100k

Still filing today

73%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ALABAMA ALLIANCE FOR CHRISTIAN EDUCATION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $186k · revenue +123%
  • NF
    NOT FORGOTTEN INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $80k · revenue +92%
  • NC
    NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER OF AL
    6× · 2017–2022 · $50k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • FB
    FIRST BIBLE CHURCH OF DECATUR
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services
2
Forever Homes for Foster Kids

helping kids find their parents or legal custodians

Food & Nutrition
3
Casa of Tipton County

Child Advocacy Services

Crime & Legal
4
Greater Chattanooga Christian Services Inc

Provide Group and Foster care for Homeless Children and Counseling

Human Services
5
Raleigh's Place

Raleigh's place is a christ-centered foster care ministry that exisits to live the gospel by loving the fatherless. we serve chilton and surrounding counties as we provide and support foster homes, host a free summer camp, provide clothing…

Human Services
6
Casa of Northeast Tennessee

Advocate for the best interest of abused and neglected children with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Crime & Legal
7
Arkansas Family Alliance F/K/a Whitsonlife Inc

Ministry for child welfare and families in crisis.

Religion
8
North Al Christian Childrens Home

Provides foster care for children placed in home by family court lauderdale county

—
9
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County
—
10
Advocacy for Foster Children Inc

Support for foster children and parents

Human Services
11
House of Prayer for All Nations

Church ministry

Religion
12
The Ark Children's Homes

Rescue orphaned or abandoned children and provide them with food, shelter, clothing, medical, dental, education, recreation while teaching the word of christianity.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighborhood Christian Center of Al; the most unlike its peers is Faces. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST BIBLE CHURCH OF DECATUR: $100,000 · OtherFIRST BIBLE CHURCH OF DECATURIndividual grant recipient: $75,050 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDEC HERITAGE CHRIST ACA: $68,500 · OtherDEC HERITAGE CHRIST ACACAMPUS OUTREACH: $10,500 · OtherALABAMA ALLIANCE FOR CHRISTIAN EDUCATION INC: $185,900 · EducationALABAMA ALLIANCE FOR CHRISTIAN E…NOT FORGOTTEN INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesNOT FORGOTTEN INCNEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER OF AL: $50,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTE…FACES: $15,000 · Human ServicesFACESTHE CIRCLE RANCH INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesTHE CIRCLE RANCH INCCASA OF NORTH ALABAMA: $7,500 · Human ServicesYOUNG LIFE: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentGLOBAL CHURCH MINISTRIES CORP: $11,000 · Religion
Other$254,050Education$185,900Human Services$164,500Youth Development$30,000Religion$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALABAMA ALLIANCE FOR CHRISTIAN EDUCATION INC: $185,900 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetNOT FORGOTTEN INC: $80,000 over 7y, 4.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER OF AL: $50,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFACES: $15,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetTHE CIRCLE RANCH INC: $12,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetGLOBAL CHURCH MINISTRIES CORP: $11,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCASA OF NORTH ALABAMA: $7,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALABAMA ALLIANCE FOR CHRISTIAN EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NOT FORGOTTEN INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER OF AL ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds FACES ↗
  • Who funds THE CIRCLE RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL CHURCH MINISTRIES CORP ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF NORTH ALABAMA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater HuntsvilleAL13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Huntsville · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cook Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cook Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cook Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Cook Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cook Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph