Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Conway Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2023
11
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$20k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

94% of Conway Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 7 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Conway Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $48k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

16
17
16
18
12
19
12
20
9
21
9
22
6
23
7
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$805kHuman Services$80kEducation$65kHealth$59kFood & Nutrition$44kEnvironment$41kCivil Rights$24kHousing & Shelter$22kOther$0
02FY2023 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k10 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$5k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE ASSUMPTION$20,000
ASCENSION FOOD PANTRY$4,000
ALICE DEAL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION (ADCA)$4,000
ISAIAH HOUSE$3,500
MEETING ESSENTIAL NEEDS WITH DIGNITY NJ (MEND)$3,500
NATURAL AREAS CONSERVANCY$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
GOOD SAMARITAN FAMILY SERVICES$2,500
UNITARIAN CONGREGATION OF GREATER NAPLES$2,000
FOOD AND FRIENDS$2,000
SAFE SHORES$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 45% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%GOOD SAMARITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $4k → 9%GOOD SAMARITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 9%GOOD DOG FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%GOOD SAMARITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 9%GOOD DOG FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%GOOD SAMARITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 9%GOOD DOG FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%GOOD SAMARITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 9%GOOD DOG FOUNDATION: $500 → 17%GOOD SAMARITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 9%GOOD SAMARITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 9%GOOD DOG FOUNDATION: $500 → 17%GOOD SAMARITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 9%GOOD DOG FOUNDATION: $500 → 17%MEETING ESSENTIAL NEEDS WITH DIGNITY: $4k → 16%TAKOMA CHILDREN'S SCHOOL: $2k → 14%TAKOMA CHILDREN'S SCHOOL: $1k → 14%TAKOMA CHILDREN'S SCHOOL: $1k → 14%TAKOMA CHILDREN'S SCHOOL: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
MD
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$301k · 33 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +74% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2023, 22 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
10

Total granted

$301k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+39%

Still filing today

64%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEnvironmentCivil RightsHealthCrime & LegalFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN FAMILY SERVICES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $18k · revenue +19%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF FLORIDA INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $17k · revenue +21%
  • AD
    Alice Deal Community Association Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $12k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • LH
    Lafayette Home and School Association ofgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +160%
  • VC
    VASSAR COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
Children's Hospital

Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…

Health
3
Abilities Network Inc

Cultivating inclusive communities through relationships, innovation and high-quality services.

Health
4
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
5
American Civil Liberties Union of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through advocacy and lobbying.

6
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

7
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
8
Greater Newark Conservancy Inc

Greater newark conservancy is a new jersey not-for-profit organization that expands access to healthy food, environmental education, and green spaces. we provide hands-on community programs that cultivate sustainability, inspire action,…

Environment
9
Children's Rights Inc

Children's rights is a national advocacy organization that investigates, exposes, and combats violations of the rights of children. through strategic advocacy and civil rights impact litigation, children's rights holds governments…

Civil Rights
10
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
11
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Mercer County Inc

Our mission is to train and supervise community volunteers appointed by the family court to advocate for the best interests of children who have been removed from their homes due to abuse and/or neglect. our dedicated volunteers strive to…

Human Services
12
Center for Family Representation Inc

Cfr's mission is to defend the rights of parents and youth through free, holistic interdisciplinary legal and social work representation.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Equal Justice Under Law and the most unlike its peers is In Christy's Shoes Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEducation Equity LeadershipSchool Parent OrganizationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Lgbtq+ Community CentersLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Animal Rescue and AdoptionCommunity FoundationsEarly Childhood Education C…Food Pantries & AssistanceChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community Health CentersLand Conservation Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr21%13%10–20yr14%20%20–35yr16%40%35–55yr20%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr21%2%10–20yr14%4%20–35yr16%85%35–55yr20%9%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
11%
8,037/74,275

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
26/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $799,655 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDLITTLE SISTERS OF THE ASSUMPTION — $47,500 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE AS…REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $32,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSIT…THE FOUNDATION FOR THE SOUTH ORGANGE LIBRARY — $21,000 · OtherTHE FOUNDATION FOR THE S…Individual grant recipient — $17,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…CHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL OF CORNELL MEDICINE — $13,500 · OtherAlice Deal Community Association Inc — $12,000 · OtherMEETING ESSENTIAL NEEDS WITH DIGNITY NJ (MEND) — $11,000 · OtherISAIAH HOUSE INC — $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $9,000 · Other+23 more — $80,500 · Other+23 moreGOOD SAMARITAN FAMILY SERVICES — $17,500 · Human ServicesTHE GOOD DOG FOUNDATION INC — $5,500 · Human ServicesTakoma Childrens School Inc — $5,000 · Human ServicesMEETING ESSENTIAL NEEDS WITH DIGNITYINC — $4,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF FLORIDA INC — $16,500 · Civil RightsCASA FOR CHILDREN OF ESSEX COUNTY INC — $6,000 · Civil RightsHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC — $2,500 · Civil RightsNATURAL AREAS CONSERVANCY INC — $10,500 · EnvironmentLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc — $5,000 · EnvironmentNature Forward — $2,000 · Environment+1 more — $500 · EnvironmentFOOD & FRIENDS INC — $8,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $8,000 · HealthFAMILY PROMISE OF ESSEX COUNTY INC — $6,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDS — $4,000 · Housing & Shelter
Community Improvement$799,655Other$254,500Human Services$32,000Civil Rights$25,000Environment$18,000Health$16,000Housing & Shelter$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $799,655 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN FAMILY SERVICES — $17,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF FLORIDA INC — $16,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAlice Deal Community Association Inc — $12,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetISAIAH HOUSE INC — $11,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL AREAS CONSERVANCY INC — $10,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD & FRIENDS INC — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY OF THE ORANGES — $6,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCASA FOR CHILDREN OF ESSEX COUNTY INC — $6,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF ESSEX COUNTY INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GOOD DOG FOUNDATION INC — $5,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLafayette Home and School Association of — $5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetTakoma Childrens School Inc — $5,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MICHIGAN — $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDS — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEETING ESSENTIAL NEEDS WITH DIGNITYINC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNature Forward — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW — $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIN CHRISTY'S SHOES INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBERGMANN CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRock Creek Conservancy Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN FAMILY SERVICES
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds Alice Deal Community Association Inc
  • Who funds ISAIAH HOUSE INC
  • Who funds NATURAL AREAS CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds FOOD & FRIENDS INC
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA
  • Who funds INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY OF THE ORANGES
  • Who funds CASA FOR CHILDREN OF ESSEX COUNTY INC
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF ESSEX COUNTY INC
  • Who funds THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER
  • Who funds THE GOOD DOG FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Little Traverse Conservancy Inc
  • Who funds GRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Lafayette Home and School Association of
  • Who funds Takoma Childrens School Inc
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MICHIGAN
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDS
  • Who funds MEETING ESSENTIAL NEEDS WITH DIGNITYINC
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC
  • Who funds Nature Forward
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ14× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · Consumers Energy Foundation · Open Society Institute · The Chicago Community Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Conway Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 33%
  • Rock Creek Conservancy Inc60% of income from government
  • Family Promise of Essex County Inc33% of income from government
  • Nature Forward32% of income from government
  • Isaiah House Inc21% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Conway Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Conway Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph