Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Convoy of Hope Foundation

CONVOY OF HOPE FOUNDATION was formed to support convoy of hope, a 501(c)(3) organization, and other charitable organizations in its supported class.

$455k
Granted FY2019
18
Grants FY2019
6
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Convoy of Hope Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Convoy Of Hope, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Convoy of Hope Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 16 organizations, $455k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
17
11
18
16
19
0
21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Religion$428kFood & Nutrition$389kHuman Services$127kInternational$115kCommunity Improvement$100kEducation$28kYouth Development$26kRecreation & Sports$15kOther$0
02FY2019 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k7 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $167k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $250k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INQUIRING SYSTEMS INC$100,000
CROSSROADS COMMUNITY CHURCH$100,000
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF MINNESOTA$50,000
MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY CHURCH$40,000
CONVOY OF HOPE$30,500
KERMAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$22,500
FIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH$21,000
DULUTH CROSS COUNTRY SKI CLUB$15,000
TURNING POINT PREGNANCY CARE CENTER$15,000
OMIE'S HOME FOR CHILDREN & BEYOND$12,500
BUENOS AMIGOS MINISTRY$10,000
THE ARK MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL$7,000
KIDS ON A MISSION$6,000
TELEIOS MINISTRY$5,000
LOVING WITH MERCY MINISTRIES$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $137k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF MINNESOTA: $50k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF MINNESOTA: $50k → 14%EVANGEL HOME: $5k → 19%EVANGEL HOME: $5k → 19%TURNING POINT PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $15k → 19%TURNING POINT PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $12k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$672k · 12 repeat orgs$183k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$672k
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-11%
+108%

Still filing today

67%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA
    2× · 2017–2019 · $100k · revenue +78%
  • TP
    TURNING POINT PREGNANCY CARE dba KERMAN CARE CENTER
    2× · 2018–2019 · $27k · revenue +142%
  • AM
    ARK Missions International
    2× · 2018–2019 · $12k · revenue +1% · 35% of their budget

Funded once

  • WV
    WORLD VISION INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • CM
    CITADEL MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue -89%
  • BA
    BORN AGAIN BODY INCDBA BUENO AMIGOSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +108%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
2
Vapor Ministries Inc

Establish sustainable centers for alleviating poverty and multiplying disciples in third-world environments.

Human Services
3
Adventive Cross Cultural Initiatives

ACCI serves pioneering Christians, empowering them to proclaim the gospel, fulfill their God-given visions, and advance the kingdom of God. ACCI longs for a world where lives are transformed through the Holy Spirit, where new disciples are…

Religion
4
Timothy Two Project International

Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.

Religion
5
Bowlin Ministries Nc

Evangelist

Religion
6
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
7
Churches in Missions Inc

Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...

Human Services
8
Reaching Souls International Inc

Our mission is in our name - Reaching Souls. Our core driving force, the reason we exist as an organization, is to reach souls for Christ. Our strategic purpose is to reach the maximum number of people for Christ in the least amount of…

Religion
9
Imi Sos International

Our mission is to provide traditional churches with consultation, pastors and counseling.

Religion
10
Challenge Ministries Us

The organization exists to spread the gospel of Jesus Christ while providing support and serving the poor through benevolent assistance, medical services, education, orphan care, church planting, etc.

International
11
Mio Frontiers

Church planting among the least evangelized peoples of the world through recruiting, training, sending, and serving field workers.

Religion
12
Agua Viva Ministries

Mission work in mexico, vibrant church-planting ministry in rural hard to reach parts of mexico. providing facilites for spiritual retreats and events, biblical training

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope and the most unlike its peers is Born Again Body Incdba Bueno Amigos. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CONVOY OF HOPE — $389,127 · InternationalCONVOY OF HOPEOMIES HOME FOR CHILDREN AND BEYOND — $90,000 · InternationalOMIES HOME FOR CHILDREN AND BEYONDCROSSROADS COMMUNITY CHURCH — $270,000 · OtherCROSSROADS COMMUNITY CHURCHMOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY CHURCH — $70,000 · OtherMOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY CHURCHFIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH — $28,500 · OtherFIRST LUTHERAN CHURCHWORLD VISION INTERNATIONAL — $25,000 · OtherWORLD VISION INTERNATIONAL+3 more — $28,500 · Other+3 moreLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA — $100,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SOC…TURNING POINT PREGNANCY CARE dba KERMAN CARE CENTER — $27,000 · Human ServicesTURNING POIN…EVANGEL HOME INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesEVANGEL HOME…INQUIRING SYSTEMS INC — $100,000 · Community ImprovementINQUIRING…KERMAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $27,500 · ReligionCITADEL MINISTRIES INC — $20,000 · ReligionARK Missions International — $12,000 · ReligionTELEIOS MINISTRY — $5,000 · ReligionLoving with Mercy Ministries Inc — $5,000 · ReligionDuluth Cross Country Ski Club — $15,000 · Recreation & SportsSan Francisco City Impact — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentOUR VALLEY CARES FOUNDATION — $10,500 · Philanthropy
International$479,127Other$422,000Human Services$137,000Community Improvement$100,000Religion$69,500Recreation & Sports$15,000Youth Development$15,000Philanthropy$10,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCONVOY OF HOPE — $389,127 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOMIES HOME FOR CHILDREN AND BEYOND — $90,000 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetKERMAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $27,500 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetCITADEL MINISTRIES INC — $20,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetDuluth Cross Country Ski Club — $15,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetARK Missions International — $12,000 over 2y, 35% of budgetKids on A Mission — $11,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetOUR VALLEY CARES FOUNDATION — $10,500 over 2y, 12% of budgetEVANGEL HOME INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBORN AGAIN BODY INCDBA BUENO AMIGOS — $7,500 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetLoving with Mercy Ministries Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Convoy of HopeMO23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Convoy of Hope · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Convoy of Hope Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Convoy of Hope Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Convoy of Hope Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph