Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Maryland and Delaware Inc

To improve the financial lives of the individuals and communities we serve.credit counseling service of md & de, inc.

$1.0M
Granted FY2023
10
Grants FY2023
8
States reached
$490k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192023.

Housing & Shelter$3.1M
02FY2023 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $63k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $535k
  • $250k+1 grant · $490k
$27,484
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONEY MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL INC$490,295
CONSUMER EDUCATION SERVICES INC CESI$245,434
CONSUMER DEBT COUNSELORS$193,920
TAKECHARGE$95,950
PARACHUTE CREDIT COUNSELING$27,484
FAMILYMEANS$13,000
CCCS OF BUFFALO$12,342
RESERVOIR HILL IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL$10,234
SERVICES OF HOPE$9,819
CLARIFI$1,950
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $3.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%TAKECHARGE: $238k → 11%FAMILYMEANS: $13k → 6%CLARIFI: $30k → 22%CCCS OF BUFFALO: $62k → 13%MONEY MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL INC: $490k → 8%CONSUMER DEBT COUNSELORS: $295k → 13%CESI: $583k → 8%TAKECHARGE: $96k → 11%CLARIFI: $2k → 22%CCCS OF BUFFALO: $55k → 13%MONEY MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL: $282k → 8%CONSUMER DEBT COUNSELORS: $194k → 13%CONSUMER EDUCATION SERVICES INC CESI: $245k → 8%TAKECHARGE: $26k → 11%PARACHUTE CREDIT COUNSELING: $27k → 13%CONSUMER DEBT COUNSELORS: $160k → 13%CESI: $34k → 8%CCCS OF BUFFALO: $15k → 13%CONSUMER DEBT COUNSELORS: $126k → 13%CESI: $18k → 8%CCCS OF BUFFALO: $12k → 13%CESI: $14k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
PA
MD
AZ
KS
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.1M · 9 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$3.1M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+15%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    CONSUMER DEBT COUNSELORS INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $775k · revenue +12%
  • MM
    MONEY MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $772k · revenue +46%
  • TC
    TAKE CHARGE AMERICA INC
    3× · 2019–2023 · $359k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • NR
    NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2021 · $35k · revenue +15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Advantage Credit Counseling Service Inc

As a nonprofit organization, the agency provides meaningful, professional and confidential consumer education and budget/credit counseling and develops effective debt reduction programs for all segments of the community. the agency…

Human Services
2
Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Southern Oregon Inc

To recognize and address the financial challenges of our clients and our community. through professional counseling and education, we endeavor to promote financial stability.

Human Services
3
Family Credit Counseling Service

Family Credit Counseling Service,Inc. DBA Family Credit Management exists to improve the financial well-being of individuals and families through financial education, counseling, and debt repayment assistance, with a focus on consumers…

Human Services
4
Springboard Nonprofit Consumer Credit Management Inc

The specific purpose of the corporation shall be to educate consumers on various options available to address their credit and debt issues, empower consumers to achieve long-term financial self-sufficiency, promote financial literacy,…

Human Services
5
Center for Consumer Recovery Inc

Center for Consumer Recovery, Inc. is committed to helping people resolve delinquent debt problems, reduce their financial stress and improve family stability. Stable families will foster better health outcomes and educational achievement…

Human Services
6
Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Rochester Inc

A nonprofit organization focused on the financial wellness of families and individuals. Our certified professionals provide confidential counseling, educational services, and other credit solutions that enable our clients to take control…

Human Services
7
Credit Card Management Services Inc

To educate, advise and empower youth to seniors to handle debt, credit & housing and to provide affordable housing opportunities through the acquisition and rehabilitation of residential properties. Debthelper.com partners with those who…

Human Services
8
Credit Counseling of Arkansas Inc

To improve the quality of life of individuals and families through financial education, credit and housing counseling, and money management services.

Human Services
9
Credit Coalition Inc

The credit coalition's purpose is to empower its clients through financial and homebuyer counseling and education, to be able to make informed, reasonable and responsible decisions in regard to their financial and specific housing goals.

Human Services
10
Debt Management Credit Counseling Corp

Our mission is to provide consumers education and budget counseling to improve their financial literacy and assist them in the management of their personal finances. we are committed to providing credit counseling through educational…

Human Services
11
Alliance Credit Counseling Inc

Charitable assistence for the poor and distressed and financial education for the public.

12
Cambridge Credit Counseling Corp

The organization specializes in providing education and counseling services to individuals and groups who are concerned about their financial situation. If appropriate, the organization also helps individuals establish affordable and…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Consumer Education Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Service of Hope Entities Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CONSUMER EDUCATION SERVICES INC — $894,472 · Human ServicesCONSUMER EDUCATION SERVICES INCCONSUMER DEBT COUNSELORS INC — $774,513 · Human ServicesCONSUMER DEBT COUNSELORS INCMONEY MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL INC — $772,070 · Human ServicesMONEY MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL INCTAKE CHARGE AMERICA INC — $359,423 · Human ServicesTAKE CHARGE AMERICA INCPARACHUTE CREDIT COUNSELING INC — $172,144 · Human ServicesPARACHUTE CREDIT COUNSELING INC+2 more — $45,240 · Human ServicesRESERVOIR HILL IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL INC — $34,924 · OtherNEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION — $34,680 · OtherConsumer Credit Counseling Service Inc — $22,958 · OtherSERVICE OF HOPE ENTITIES INC — $27,254 · Youth Development
Human Services$3,017,862Other$92,562Youth Development$27,254

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCONSUMER EDUCATION SERVICES INC — $894,472 over 5y, 7.7% of budgetCONSUMER DEBT COUNSELORS INC — $774,513 over 4y, 21% of budgetMONEY MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL INC — $772,070 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTAKE CHARGE AMERICA INC — $359,423 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetPARACHUTE CREDIT COUNSELING INC — $172,144 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetRESERVOIR HILL IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL INC — $34,924 over 2y, 20% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION — $34,680 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE OF DELAWARE VALLEY — $32,240 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSERVICE OF HOPE ENTITIES INC — $27,254 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetConsumer Credit Counseling Service Inc — $22,958 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetFAMILYMEANS — $13,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Foundation for Credit Counseling IncDC22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Foundation for Credit Counseling Inc · Consumer Credit Counseling Service of San Francisco Dba Balance · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Maryland and Delaware Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 68%
  • Reservoir Hill Improvement Council Inc68% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Maryland and Delaware Inc?

Find your warmest path to Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Maryland and Delaware Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph