Skip to content

· Private foundation

Connie Gotsch Arts Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$349k
Granted FY2024still arriving
41
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$693kRecreation & Sports$35kEducation$35kYouth Development$18kEnvironment$12kCommunity Improvement$10kHuman Services$8kHealth$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k30 grants · $97k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $199k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWEST NM ARTS COUNCIL$53,000
GRANTS TO INDIVS FOR ARTS EDUCATION$44,847
CITY OF FARMINGTON-MUSIC GARDEN AT$35,000
CITY OF FARMINGTONFOUR CORNERS MUSI$26,500
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$18,000
AZTEC MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICT$15,623
AZTEC MUSEUM ASSOC$14,850
RIVER REACH FOUNDATION$12,000
INSPIRE HEART$11,464
SAN JUAN SYMPHONY$11,000
FARMINGTON MUSEUM$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
AREA DANCE STUDIOS-DANCE SEMINAR$7,250
Individual grant recipient$6,360
CITY OF FARMINGTON-HEATHER MCGAUGHE$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 21%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 21%MASADA HOUSE: $6k → 22%MASADA HOUSE: $2k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$624k · 23 repeat orgs$199k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
31

Total granted

$624k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+381%

Still filing today

17%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $136k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GT
    GRANTS TO INDIVS FOR ARTS EDUCATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $185k
  • SJ
    SAN JUAN SYMPHONY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $120k
  • NN
    NORTHWEST NM ARTS COUNCIL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $56k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • AH
    AZTEC HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa Solana Inc

Education/Counseling

Health
2
Nacitone Foundation Inc

To Preserve the Nacitone Valley History

Arts & Culture
3
Saguaro Janes Corporation

Food Bank

Community Improvement
4
Cedar Hill Retreat Center Inc

Provides retreat programs for individuals and groups

—
5
Unaka Residence Inc

Provide housing for veterans

Human Services
6
Actors Repertory Theatre of Idaho

Produce plays for public entertainment

—
7
Grand River Museum

History museum

Arts & Culture
8
River Country Nature Center Inc

Musuem

Environment
9
Francisco Center for the Performing Arts Inc

Encourage performing arts

Arts & Culture
10
Ajo Historical Society Inc

To preserve the historical assets of Ajo Arizona

—
11
Fordland Senior Citizens Housing in

Provide affordable housing for low incom

—
12
Kingman Community Theatre

To run the historical theatre

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Farmington Museum Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is River Reach Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
4/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRANTS TO INDIVS FOR ARTS EDUCATION: $185,426 · OtherGRANTS TO INDIVS FOR ARTS EDUCATIONSAN JUAN SYMPHONY: $119,980 · OtherSAN JUAN SYMPHONYNORTHWEST NM ARTS COUNCIL: $55,900 · OtherNORTHWEST NM ARTS COUNCILYOUNG AUDIENCE PRGM-MUSICIANS FEES: $36,196 · OtherCITY OF FARMINGTON-MUSIC GARDEN AT: $35,000 · OtherSAN JUAN COLLEGE: $32,488 · OtherCITY OF FARMINGTONFOUR CORNERS MUSI: $26,500 · Other+64 more: $258,736 · Other+64 moreINSPIRE HEART INC: $30,963 · Arts & CultureAztec Museum Association: $22,290 · Arts & CultureTheater Ensemble Arts Inc: $5,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,500 · Arts & CultureMASADA HOUSE INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesREGIONAL ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION: $2,500 · AnimalsNavajo Preparatory School Inc: $1,500 · EducationBASIN GOOD NEIGHBOR FOUNDATION INC: $790 · Health
Other$750,226Arts & Culture$59,753Human Services$8,000Animals$2,500Education$1,500Health$790

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINSPIRE HEART INC: $30,963 over 4y, 8.4% of budgetAztec Museum Association: $22,290 over 2y, 15% of budgetRIVER REACH FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetMASADA HOUSE INC: $8,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetTHE ARC OF SAN JUAN COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTheater Ensemble Arts Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetREGIONAL ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetFARMINGTON MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetNavajo Preparatory School Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBASIN GOOD NEIGHBOR FOUNDATION INC: $790 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTres Rios Habitat for Humanity: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INSPIRE HEART INC ↗
  • Who funds Aztec Museum Association ↗
  • Who funds RIVER REACH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MASADA HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds AZTEC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF SAN JUAN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Theater Ensemble Arts Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Merrion Family FoundationDE30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Merrion Family Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Thomas a and Mary E Dugan Foundation · Westmeath Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Connie Gotsch Arts Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Connie Gotsch Arts Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Connie Gotsch Arts Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Connie Gotsch Arts Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Connie Gotsch Arts’ filings →

    More from the funding graph