Skip to content

· Public charity

Connecticut Youth Services Association Inc

Connecticut youth services association (cysa) brings together and empowers connecticut youth service bureaus (ysbs) through statewide coordination, training, advocacy, and innovation, ensuring every community has the necessary tools to support young people and their families.

$570k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Youth Development$2.3MCommunity Improvement$180kHuman Services$147kHealth$137kCrime & Legal$76kPublic Benefit$41kArts & Culture$33kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 31 grants below total $548,607, the rows itemized in this filing. The $569,806 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $21,199 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k24 grants · $500k
$13,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$449k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIDDLETOWN YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU$40,250
NORWALK YOUTH SERVICES$40,250
Individual grant recipient$37,950
FARMINGTON YOUTH SERVICES$35,650
TEEG$27,600
HAMDEN YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU$26,450
WEST HARTFORD YOUTH SERVICES$26,450
ENFIELD YOUTH SERVICES$24,129
STAMFORD - DOMUS KIDS INC$23,000
MANCHESTER YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU$20,985
EAST HARTFORD YOUTH SERVICES$20,095
GUILFORD YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES$17,860
BRISTOL YOUTH SERVICES INC$17,789
NEW LONDON YOUTH AFFAIRS$17,250
WINDSOR YOUTH SERVICES$14,950
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 37 repeat orgs$787k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
29

Total granted

$2.2M
$645k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+21%

Still filing today

16%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $141k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    UNITED SERVICES INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $99k · revenue +34%
  • AH
    ANDOVER HEBRON MARLBOROUGH YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $55k · revenue +25%
  • DY
    DANBURY YOUTH SERVICES
    2× · 2021–2022 · $43k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • MY
    MIDDLETOWN YOUTH SERVICES
    one grant, 2024 · $55k
  • WS
    WETHERSFIELD SOCIAL & YOUTH
    one grant, 2022 · $54k
  • NY
    NORWALK YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU
    one grant, 2023 · $35k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Westbrook Youth and Family Services Inc

To support and strengthen the youth and families of westbrook, ct through coordinating and providing a comprehensive delivery system of prevention, intervention, treatment, and follow up services

Human Services
2
Lymes Youth Service Bureau

The purpose of the Organization is to provide programs and services for the youth and families of Lyme and Old Lyme, CT. The Organization identifies and satisfies various youth needs by providing professional guidance to promote healthy…

—
3
Newtown Youth & Family Services Inc

Ny&fs is a licensed, non-profit mental health clinic & youth service bureau dedicated to helping children & families achieve their highest potential. we provide programs, services, activities, counseling, support groups & education…

Human Services
4
Old Colony Young Men's Christian Association Inc

Old colony ymca helps children, families, and individuals develop to their fullest potential. we respond to ever-changing community needs and view our services through three lenses: youth development, healthy living, and social…

Human Services
5
Worcester Youth and Family Counseling Services Inc

Worcester youth and family services empowers all people, of all ages, toward leading capable, purposeful, responsible, fulfilled lives in healthy families and communities.

Human Services
6
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
7
Connecticut Counseling Centers Inc

To provide substance abuse and mental health treatment services. programs include methadone maintenance, outpatient, hiv, detoxification and dually diagnosed treatments and counseling.

—
8
Northeast Center for Youth and Families Inc

Provide a range of high-quality, community-based, behavioral health services to empower individuals and families to live healthy and successful lives.

Human Services
9
Tri-Town Youth Services Bureau Inc

Tri-town youth services bureau inc. is a nonprofit agency that coordinates,develops and provides services dedicated to promoting the positive growth and development of youth and families in chester, deep river, and essex, connecticut.

Youth Development
10
Youth & Family Counseling Agency of Oyster Bay - East Norwich Inc

Provides a wide range of health and social welfare services designed to strengthen the lives of individuals and families of the hamlet of Oyster Bay and its surrounding communities.

Human Services
11
Community Guidance Clinic for Central Connecticut Inc

Community guidance clinic for central connecticut, an established and trusted community resource, provides comprehensive evidence-based behavioral health services that promote wellness and resilience. our collaborative, family-focused,…

Human Services
12
Rushford Center Inc

Rushford Center, Inc., is dedicated to meeting the substance abuse and mental health needs of children, adults and families. Working cooperatively with our Hartford HealthCare network partners and others who share our goals, Rushford…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Durham-Middlefield Youth & Family Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FARMINGTON YOUTH SERVICES INC: $218,970 · OtherFARMINGTON YOUTH SERVICES INCMIDDLETOWN YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU: $198,251 · OtherMIDDLETOWN YOUTH SERVICES BUREAUMONTVILLE YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU: $98,501 · OtherEAST HARTFORD YOUTH SERVICES: $92,460 · Other+65 more: $2,125,914 · Other+65 moreUNITED SERVICES INC: $99,188 · Human ServicesANDOVER HEBRON MARLBOROUGH YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $55,075 · Human ServicesNORTHWESTERN CT YMCA INC: $21,667 · Human ServicesANNIE C COURTNEY FOUNDATION: $13,203 · Human ServicesTHOMPSON ECUMENICAL EMPOWERMENT GROUP INC: $18,500 · Youth DevelopmentEAST HADDAM YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $8,050 · Community Improvement
Other$2,734,096Human Services$189,133Youth Development$18,500Community Improvement$8,050

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED SERVICES INC: $99,188 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWATERBURY YOUTH SERVICES INC: $65,001 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetANDOVER HEBRON MARLBOROUGH YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $55,075 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetDANBURY YOUTH SERVICES: $43,334 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetCATALYST CT INC: $43,334 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWINDHAM REGIONAL COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC: $28,250 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNORTHWESTERN CT YMCA INC: $21,667 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCLIFFORD BEERS COMMUNITY CARE CENTER INC: $21,667 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHOMPSON ECUMENICAL EMPOWERMENT GROUP INC: $18,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetDurham-Middlefield Youth & Family Services Inc: $14,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetEAST HADDAM YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $8,050 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERBURY YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds ANDOVER HEBRON MARLBOROUGH YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds DANBURY YOUTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds CATALYST CT INC ↗
  • Who funds TORRINGTON AREA YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU INC ↗
  • Who funds WINDHAM REGIONAL COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Governor's Partnership to Protect Connecticut's Workforce IncCT20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Governor's Partnership to Protect Connecticut's Workforce Inc · Wheeler Clinic Inc · Newalliance Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Eastern Connecticut Inc · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Connecticut Youth Services Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Connecticut Youth Services Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 27%
  • United Services Inc: 70% of income from government
  • Clifford Beers Community Care Center Inc: 50% of income from government
  • Windham Regional Community Council Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Danbury Youth Services: 27% of income from government
  • Thompson Ecumenical Empowerment Group Inc: 19% of income from government
  • East Haddam Youth & Family Services Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Durham-Middlefield Youth & Family Services Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Connecticut Youth Services Association Inc?

Find your warmest path to Connecticut Youth Services Association Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Connecticut Youth Services Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph