· Public charity
Connecticut Trust for Historic Preservation Inc
Interacts with other groups, individuals and organizations to encourage, advocate and facilitate historical preservation throughout connecticut.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 62% of CONNECTICUT TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $95,630 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $302,426 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $206,796 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $65k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CALVARY TEMPLE CHRISTIAN CENTER IN | $15,000 |
| YELLOW FARMHOUSE EDUCATION CENTER | $10,000 |
| CONNECTICUT DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERIC | $10,000 |
| SIMSBURY HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| HILL STEAD MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| MERWINSVILLE HOTEL RESTORATION INC | $10,000 |
| MANCHESTER HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $8,890 |
| NORTH STONINGTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $8,500 |
| FIRST ECCLESIASTICAL SOCIETY EAST H | $7,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,740 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NHNEW HAVEN COLONY HISTORICAL SOCIETY4× · 2017–2021 · $44k · revenue +54%
- TRTHE ROCKFALL FOUNDATION3× · 2017–2024 · $33k · revenue +128%
MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC2× · 2018–2023 · $22k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- CCCONNECTICUT CANCER FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $33k · revenue +30%
- NLNEW LONDON MARITIME SOCIETY INCone grant, 2017 · $19k · revenue -23%
- HSHARTFORD SPANISH SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTone grant, 2024 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To collect and preserve Miford, Connecticut antiquities and to encourage historical investigation.
To exhibit and preserve materials related to the history of new hartford, ct.
Preservation of historical memorabilia - town of Hadley MA
Historic preservation
Museum
The mission is to develop and preserve the history of dorset, its evirons and its people
Historic preservation for the town of stratford
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Haven Colony Historical Society and the most unlike its peers is The Rockfall Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 55 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
84 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 84 of the 128 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEW HAVEN COLONY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ROCKFALL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KEELER TAVERN ↗
- Who funds MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds TORRINGTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds OLD SAYBROOK HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Flanders Nature Center & Land Trust Inc ↗
- Who funds ADAM STANTON HOUSE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds WINDHAM PRESERVATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE MARK TWAIN MEMORIAL ↗
- Who funds HARRIET BEECHER STOWE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEW LONDON MARITIME SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST CONNECTICUT LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds NEW MILFORD HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HAVEN CITY BURIAL GROUND ↗
- Who funds Gaylord Hospital INC ↗
- Who funds Joshua's Tract Conservation and Historic Trust Inc ↗
- Who funds MANCHESTER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds WHITNEYVILLE CULTURAL COMMONS INC ↗
- Who funds THE ANTIQUARIAN & LANDMARKS SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR LIVING INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Connecticut Humanities Council Inc · Chelsea Groton Foundation · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · The Connecticut Community Foundation · The Edward and Mary Lord Foundation · The Maximilian E and Marion O Hoffman Foundation Inc · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · Ion Bank Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · The William and Alice Mortensen Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · The Community Foundation of Eastern Connecticut Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Connecticut Trust for Historic Preservation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Norwich Arts Center Inc — 86% of income from government
- Alliance for Living Inc — 72% of income from government
- Governor Samuel Huntington Trust Inc — 72% of income from government
- Noah Webster House Inc — 46% of income from government
- United Community and Family Servicesinc — 29% of income from government
- Ball & Socket Arts Inc — 26% of income from government
- Calkins Family Association — 23% of income from government
- Southington-Cheshire Community Ymca — 23% of income from government
- The Mark Twain Memorial — 22% of income from government
- Young Men's Institute Library — 21% of income from government
- Neighborhood Housing Services of New Haven Inc — 13% of income from government
- Northwest Connecticut Land Conservancy Inc — 9% of income from government
- Hill-Stead Museum — 7% of income from government
- The Denison Society Inc — 6% of income from government
- Gaylord Hospital Inc — 6% of income from government
- Yellow Farmhouse Education Center Inc — 5% of income from government
- Mystic Seaport Museum Inc — 5% of income from government
- Mather Homestead Foundation — 4% of income from government
- Harriet Beecher Stowe Center Inc — 4% of income from government
- Stonington Village Improvement Assoc Inc — 2% of income from government
- Wilton Historical Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Eugene O'neill Memorial Theater Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Connecticut Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Woodbury Cemetery Association — 0% of income from government
- Music Mountain Incorporated — 0% of income from government
- Windham Free Library Association — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.