Skip to content

· Public charity

Connecticut Council of Family Service Agencies Inc

The council serves as the backbone of the network for several collaborative programs, providing administrative and programmatic oversight, developing and maintaining contractual relationships, and providing performance management & quality improvement.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$585k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$11MHuman Services$140k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $1,690,591, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,997,823 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $307,232 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k6 grants · $650k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.0M
$131,882
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE OF$584,909
FAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY$455,863
CATHOLIC CHARITIES - MERIDEN$213,517
UNITED SERVICES$131,882
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER$95,472
FAMILY CENTER'S INC$74,417
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD$70,848
KLINGBERG FAMILY CENTERS$63,683
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 11 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$11M
$49k

Still filing today

91%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ARCHDIOCESE OF HARTFORD
    8× · 2017–2025 · $4.4M · revenue +15%
  • JF
    Jewish Family Service of Greater Hartford Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $813k · revenue +138%
  • US
    UNITED SERVICES INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $655k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • CC
    Catholic Charities - New Haven
    one grant, 2019 · $49k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Family Services of Greenwich

Jewish family services of greenwich (jfs) is a nonprofit social service agency dedicated to strengthening individuals and families in fairfield and new london counties. jfs provides behavioral health counseling, food security programs,…

—
2
Family and Children's Aid Inc

Fca is a community-based behavioral health center that offers innovation, responsive and traditional mental health care and services for children, adolescents, adults and their families.

Human Services
3
Jewish Family Service of Stamford Inc

Jewish family services was established to promote and enhance the well-being of the community by providing social services which reflect jewish values. the agency is dedicated to helping people manage their lives, improve the quality of…

—
4
Child and Family Agency of Southeastern Connecticut Inc

Advancing individual and community health

Human Services
5
The Child and Family Guidance Center Inc

The child and family guidance center (cfgc) is a community-based center that provides therapeutic, prevention, early intervention as well as support services to children and families in fairfield county ct. since 1925, cfgc has provided…

Human Services
6
Northeast Center for Youth and Families Inc

Provide a range of high-quality, community-based, behavioral health services to empower individuals and families to live healthy and successful lives.

Human Services
7
Family Service Society of Yonkers

The mission of family service society of yonkers is to be the premier provider of human services through a range of programs focusing on home health care, diverse family supports, education and advocacy. family service society of yonkers…

Human Services
8
Jewish Family Service of Northeastern Pennsylvania

Jewish family service is a human service organization which reflects the jewish tradition of caring and compassion for all people in need. through professional counseling, advocacy and educational programming, our services seek to enhance…

Human Services
9
Family and Children's Service Inc of Monmouth County

Family and children's services provides compassionate care, intervention and education to support people during challenging times in their lives.

Human Services
10
Community Guidance Clinic for Central Connecticut Inc

Community guidance clinic for central connecticut, an established and trusted community resource, provides comprehensive evidence-based behavioral health services that promote wellness and resilience. our collaborative, family-focused,…

Human Services
11
Jewish Family Services of Delaware Inc

To strengthen individuals, families, and the community by providing counseling and support services. inspired by the fundamental jewish value that "we are all responsible for one another", jfs supports people of all backgrounds by…

Human Services
12
Family Service Association of Greater Fall River Inc

Strengthen and support individuals and families and to address the social service needs of our diverse and changing communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Family Centers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ARCHDIOCESE OF HARTFORD: $4,387,537 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ARCHDIOCESE OF HARTFORDFAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INC: $1,559,158 · Human ServicesFAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INCLIFEBRIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $1,120,007 · Human ServicesLIFEBRIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES INCUNITED SERVICES INC: $654,712 · Human ServicesUNITED SERVICES INCNEWTOWN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $602,831 · Human ServicesNEWTOWN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INCKLINGBERG FAMILY CENTERS INC: $419,831 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF GREATER NEW HAV: $304,386 · Human ServicesJewish Family Service of Greater Hartford Inc: $813,248 · OtherJewish Family Servi…FAMILY CENTERS INC: $452,080 · OtherFAMILY CENTERS INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF NORWICH INC: $297,592 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES …Catholic Charities - Meriden: $293,997 · OtherCatholic Charities …+1 more: $48,846 · Other
Human Services$9,048,462Other$1,905,763

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ARCHDIOCESE OF HARTFORD: $4,387,537 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetFAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INC: $1,559,158 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetLIFEBRIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $1,120,007 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetJewish Family Service of Greater Hartford Inc: $813,248 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetUNITED SERVICES INC: $654,712 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetNEWTOWN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $602,831 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetFAMILY CENTERS INC: $452,080 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetKLINGBERG FAMILY CENTERS INC: $419,831 over 5y, 17% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF GREATER NEW HAV: $304,386 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF NORWICH INC: $297,592 over 4y, 6.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ARCHDIOCESE OF HARTFORD ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFEBRIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Family Service of Greater Hartford Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWTOWN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds KLINGBERG FAMILY CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF GREATER NEW HAV ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF NORWICH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

William Caspar Graustein Memorial FundCT13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Connecticut Council of Family Service Agencies Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Connecticut Council of Family Service Agencies Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 33%
  • United Services Inc: 70% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities Inc Archdiocese of Hartford: 52% of income from government
  • Family & Children's Agency Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Newtown Youth & Family Services Inc: 33% of income from government
  • Lifebridge Community Services Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Family Centers Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Jewish Family Service of Greater Hartford Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2026) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2025, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Connecticut Council of Family Service Agencies’ filings →

More from the funding graph