Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cone Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$35kYouth Development$21kAnimals$18kPhilanthropy$14kFood & Nutrition$7kArts & Culture$6kReligion$3kHuman Services$1k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$264k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAYO CLINIC$7,000
NEST CAFE$3,500
YOUTH HOPE$2,500
EAST MOLINE FOUNDATION$2,000
CHILDREN'S THERAPY CENTER$1,000
GIGI PLAYHOUSE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 76% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MAYO CLINIC: $7k → 9%KINGS HARVEST PET RESCUE: $2k → 12%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%NEST CAFE: $4k → 15%MAYO CLINIC: $6k → 9%DISPATCH-ARGUS SANTA FUND: $1k → 12%NEST CAFE: $3k → 15%MAYO CLINIC: $5k → 9%CHILDREN'S THERAPY CENTER: $3k → 15%MAYO CLINIC: $4k → 9%CHILDREN'S THERAPY CENTER: $2k → 15%MAYO CLINIC: $3k → 9%CHILDREN'S THERAPY CENTER: $1k → 15%CHILDREN'S THERAPY CENTER: $1k → 15%CHILDREN'S THERAPY CENTER: $1k → 15%EAST MOLINE FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%CHRIST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $3k → 15%EAST MOLINE FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%EAST MOLINE FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%EAST MOLINE FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%EAST MOLINESILVIS ROTARY: $1k → 15%EAST MOLINESILVIS ROTARY: $1k → 15%CHRISTIAN FRIENDLINESS: $10k → 15%EM FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%QC PAWS: $5k → 15%QC PAWS: $3k → 15%YOUTH HOPE: $3k → 15%RESCUED: $2k → 15%YOUTH HOPE: $2k → 15%GIGI PLAYHOUSE: $2k → 15%RESCUED: $2k → 15%GILDA'S CLUB: $2k → 15%YOUTH HOPE: $2k → 15%YOUTH HOPE: $2k → 15%QC PAWS: $1k → 15%RESCUED: $1k → 15%CHRISTIAN FRIENDLINESS: $1k → 15%GIGI PLAYHOUSE: $1k → 15%GIGI PLAYHOUSE: $1k → 15%RESCUED: $1k → 15%QC PAWS: $1k → 15%GIGI PLAYHOUSE: $1k → 15%GIGI PLAYHOUSE: $1k → 15%QC PAWS: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 30% of Cone Family Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 74% of the giving stays in IL; by stated purpose, 67%.

Cone Family Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$66k · 9 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$66k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+14%

Still filing today

44%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsPhilanthropyFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Y
    YOUTHHOPE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $8k · revenue +112%
  • CT
    CHILDREN'S THERAPY CENTER OF THE QUAD CITIES NFP
    5× · 2020–2024 · $8k · revenue +20%
  • NN
    NEST NOURISH EVERYONE SUSTAINABLY TOGETHER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $7k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • EF
    EM FOUNDATION XXXXX5005graduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +214%
  • CU
    CHRIST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • GC
    GILDA'S CLUB CHICAGO
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Illinois Children's Healthcare Foundation
Human Services
2
City of Hope National Medical Center

City of Hope National Medical Center's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
3
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
4
Mayo Clinic Group Return

To inspire hope and contribute to health and well-being by providing the best care to every patient through integrated clinical practice, education, and research.

Health
5
Indiana Wish Inc

The mission of indiana wish is to grant wishes to indiana children ages 3 -18 diagnosed with a life-threatening illness.

Health
6
Children's Miracle Network

Children's miracle network (dba "children's miracle network hospitals") works to save kids' lives by bringing people together to raise money for children's healthcare in local communities.

Unclassified
7
Mercy Foundation Inc

We, mercy health system of chicago and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mercy foundation is a member of mercy health system of chicago…

Philanthropy
8
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
9
Elmhurst Memorial Healthcare Group

The elmhurst memorial healthcare group follows the mission of endeavor health (f/k/a ns-ee holdings). the mission of endeavor health is to "help everyone in our communities be their best." central to this mission is a commitment to…

—
10
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago Foundation

To optimize philanthropy in support of the mission and future of the children's hospital of chicago medical center.

Health
11
Elmhurst Memorial Healthcare

Elmhurst memorial healthcare follows the mission of endeavor health. the mission of endeavor health is to "help everyone in our communities be their best." central to this mission is a commitment to providing clinical programs and services…

Health
12
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc; the most unlike its peers is Em Foundation XXXXX5005. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEAST MOLINE FOUNDATION: $8,500 · OtherEAST MOLINE FOUNDATIONYOUTHHOPE: $7,500 · OtherYOUTHHOPECHILDREN'S THERAPY CENTER OF THE QUAD CITIES NFP: $7,500 · OtherCHILDREN'S THERAPY CENTER OF THE QUAD CITIES NFPGIGIS PLAYHOUSE INC: $6,000 · OtherGIGIS PLAYHOUSE INCCHRIST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · Other+3 more: $3,500 · Other+3 moreMAYO CLINIC: $24,500 · HealthMAYO CLINICGILDA'S CLUB CHICAGO: $2,000 · HealthGILDA'S CLUB CHICAGONEST NOURISH EVERYONE SUSTAINABLY TOGETHER: $6,500 · Food & NutritionRESCUED INC: $6,000 · AnimalsEM FOUNDATION XXXXX5005: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$59,000Health$26,500Food & Nutrition$6,500Animals$6,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAYO CLINIC: $24,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTHHOPE: $7,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S THERAPY CENTER OF THE QUAD CITIES NFP: $7,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNEST NOURISH EVERYONE SUSTAINABLY TOGETHER: $6,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetRESCUED INC: $6,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetEM FOUNDATION XXXXX5005: $5,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB CHICAGO: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHHOPE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S THERAPY CENTER OF THE QUAD CITIES NFP ↗
  • Who funds NEST NOURISH EVERYONE SUSTAINABLY TOGETHER ↗
  • Who funds RESCUED INC ↗
  • Who funds EM FOUNDATION XXXXX5005 ↗
  • Who funds GILDA'S CLUB CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Rock Island Community FoundationIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Rock Island Community Foundation · Moline Foundation · Quad Cities Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cone Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cone Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cone Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph