Skip to content
Plinth

· Community foundation

Condors Community Foundation

The Condors Community Foundation (the Foundation) mission is to support community organizations whose purpose is to enhance the health, education and general well-being of Kern County residents, particularly children and families in need.

$7k
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Health$90kRecreation & Sports$54kYouth Development$44kCrime & Legal$31kCommunity Improvement$7k
02FY2021 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$7,117
Median grant
1
States reached
$102k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Active 20-30 Club$7,117
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%BARC: $7k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$98k · 4 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2021, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
11

Total granted

$98k
$130k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-59%
+57%

Still filing today

100%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CBCC FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY WELLNESS INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $33k · revenue -68%
  • AM
    Al Malaikah Shriners Kern County Shrine Club
    4× · 2017–2020 · $27k
  • A2
    Active 20-30 United States & Canada 27
    2× · 2018–2019 · $20k · revenue -59%

Funded once

  • KC
    Kern County Law Enforcement Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $24k · revenue -42% · 84% of their budget
  • KC
    Kern County Hockey Clubgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $23k · revenue +78%
  • KC
    KERN COUNTY FIRE FIGHTERS BURN SURVIVORS TRUST
    one grant, 2018 · $21k · revenue +14% · 44% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kern County Fire Department Retired Employees Asso

Support of local retired firefighters

Recreation & Sports
2
Bakersfield Police Activities League

the organization's mission is the prevention of juvenile delinquency in kern county.

Youth Development
3
Epilepsy Society of Kern County
Health
4
Kern County Farm Bureau

To represent, protect and advance the social, economic and educational interest of the farmers in kern county, california.

5
Kern County Library Foundation
Education
6
Wounded Heroes Fund Kern County

The organization provides financial assistance and moral support to active, discharged and retired military service men and women, with emphasis on those injured in the iraq and afganistan conflicts.

Human Services
7
Kern County Sheriffs Mounted Posse

Provide various services for handicapped

Community Improvement
8
The Boys and Girls Clubs of Kern County

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
9
Light Brigade

Supported various Kern County youth baseball programs through sponsorships and donations and equipment and supplies.

10
Bakersfield Recovery Services

Provide residential and outpatient treatment for drug and alcohol abuse.

Health
11
Kern County Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Business Education Foundation

To support and enhance business education programs, resources and economic development primarily within the business community of Kern County.

Education
12
Kern County Hispanic Chamber of Commerce

To create, promote and enhance business opportunities for our membership, and provide business, cultural and resource linkages, with special emphasis on the Hispanic community.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kern County Hockey Club and the most unlike its peers is Houchin Community Blood Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Al Malaikah Shriners Kern County Shrine Club — $26,741 · OtherAl Malaikah Shriners Kern County Shrine ClubKern County Law Enforcement Foundation — $24,435 · OtherKern County Law Enforcement FoundationActive 20-30 United States & Canada 27 — $20,000 · OtherActive 20-30 United States & Canada 27MARE Riding Center — $15,750 · OtherMARE Riding CenterBAKERSFIELD POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION — $7,000 · OtherBAKERSFIELD POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATIONWASCO JUNIOR WOMANS CLUB — $7,000 · OtherWASCO JUNIOR WOMANS CLUBBRIGADE RECREATIONAL YOUTH SOCCER LEAGUE — $5,521 · OtherCBCC FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY WELLNESS INC — $33,380 · HealthCBCC FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY …KERN COUNTY FIRE FIGHTERS BURN SURVIVORS TRUST — $21,100 · HealthKERN COUNTY FIRE FIGHTERS BURN…HOUCHIN COMMUNITY BLOOD BANK — $7,000 · HealthHOUCHIN COMMUNITY BLOOD BANKKern County Hockey Club — $22,849 · Recreation & SportsKern County H…BAKERSFIELD SOUTHWEST BASEBALL INC — $5,100 · Recreation & SportsBAKERSFIELD S…Foundation of Active 20-30 Club of Bakersfield Inc — $17,455 · Human ServicesFoundation o…Bakersfield Arc Inc — $7,000 · Human ServicesBakersfield …KERN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 · Community Improvement
Other$106,447Health$61,480Recreation & Sports$27,949Human Services$24,455Community Improvement$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCBCC FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY WELLNESS INC — $33,380 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetKern County Law Enforcement Foundation — $24,435 over 1y, 84% of budgetKern County Hockey Club — $22,849 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetKERN COUNTY FIRE FIGHTERS BURN SURVIVORS TRUST — $21,100 over 1y, 44% of budgetActive 20-30 United States & Canada 27 — $20,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetFoundation of Active 20-30 Club of Bakersfield Inc — $17,455 over 2y, 26% of budgetMARE Riding Center — $15,750 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetBakersfield Arc Inc — $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAKERSFIELD POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION — $7,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHOUCHIN COMMUNITY BLOOD BANK — $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKERN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetBAKERSFIELD SOUTHWEST BASEBALL INC — $5,100 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kern Community FoundationCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kern Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Condors Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Condors Community Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Condors Community Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $190k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph