Skip to content
Concurrent Technologies Corporation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Concurrent Technologies Corporation

Concurrent Technologies Corporation (CTC) provides applied scientific research & development services, in the public interest, to develop innovative technology and management solutions.

$163k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$138kPhilanthropy$53kHuman Services$30kCommunity Improvement$21kEmployment$15k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $82,650, the rows itemized in this filing. The $163,491 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $80,841 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $63k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$84M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Johnstown Area Heritage Association$21,500
Johnstown Symphony Orchestra$20,650
United Way of the Laurel Highlands$10,500
YMCA$10,000
Vision Together 2025 Inc$7,100
Community Foundation for the Alleghenies$6,900
The Pennsylvania Society$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YMCA: $10k → 16%YMCA: $10k → 16%YMCA: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$220k · 6 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$220k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
-7%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JS
    JOHNSTOWN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
    3× · 2023–2025 · $62k · revenue +11%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF THE SOUTHERN ALLEGHENIES INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $32k · revenue +31%
  • YO
    YMCA OF THE ROSES
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • JA
    JOHNSTOWN AREA REGIONAL INDUSTRIES
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue -7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Johnstown Historical Society
—
2
Johnstown Educational Foundation

The johnstown educational foundation mission is to receive, administer and distribute funds exclusively for the benefit and support of the university of pittsburgh at johnstown.

—
3
Greater Johnstown Community Ymca

The greater johnstown ymca is a membership association of men and women of all ages, income, races and religions. the association is dedicated to improving the quaility of life through programs and services which provide opportunities for…

—
4
Grand Junction Symphony Orchestra

To present live symphonic musical performances to the general public, as well as provide educational programs and concerts to people of all ages.

Arts & Culture
5
Jamestown Area Chamber of Commerce

To promote civic, economic, & social growth

—
6
Johnstown Industrial Development Corpora

Promotion of economic development in the region

Community Improvement
7
Johnstown Business District Development

Real estate development

—
8
Greater Philadelphia Tourism Marketing Corporation

Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.

Community Improvement
9
Wissahickon Valley Watershed Association Inc

To protect the quality & beauty of the wissahickon creek & to enhance life in the watershed.

Environment
10
Susquehanna Heritage Corporation

As a designated national and state heritage area, susquehanna heritage corporation works to raise awareness and appreciation of the cultural and economic value of the susquehanna riverlands, and preserve, enhance and celebrate the area's…

Community Improvement
11
Greater Johnstowncambria County Chamber of Commerce

To advance the commercial, industrial, civic and general interest of greater johnstown and adjacent territories and to promote industry and public welfare in the community.

Philanthropy
12
Foundation for Pennsylvania Watersheds

The organization has been formed for charitable, scientific, and educational purposes, with a particular focus on working to protect pa's water and watersheds.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Johnstown Area Heritage Association; the most unlike its peers is United Way of the Southern Alleghenies Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOHNSTOWN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $61,514 · Arts & CultureJOHNSTOWN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAJOHNSTOWN AREA HERITAGE ASSOCIATION: $58,250 · Arts & CultureJOHNSTOWN AREA HERITAGE ASSOCIATIONTHE PENNSYLVANIA SOCIETY: $18,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PENNSYLVANIA SOCIETYVISION TOGETHER 2025 INC: $20,600 · Community ImprovementVISION TOGETHER…JOHNSTOWN AREA REGIONAL INDUSTRIES: $15,000 · Community ImprovementJOHNSTOWN AREA …UNITED WAY OF THE SOUTHERN ALLEGHENIES INC: $31,700 · OtherUNITED WAY OF …YMCA OF THE ROSES: $30,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF THE R…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER JOHNSTOWN: $21,150 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY…
Arts & Culture$137,764Community Improvement$35,600Other$31,700Human Services$30,000Philanthropy$21,150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHNSTOWN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $61,514 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetJOHNSTOWN AREA HERITAGE ASSOCIATION: $58,250 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE SOUTHERN ALLEGHENIES INC: $31,700 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetYMCA OF THE ROSES: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER JOHNSTOWN: $21,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVISION TOGETHER 2025 INC: $20,600 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetTHE PENNSYLVANIA SOCIETY: $18,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetJOHNSTOWN AREA REGIONAL INDUSTRIES: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ctc Foundation1889 Foundation IncCommunity Foundation …
Ctc FoundationPA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ctc Foundation · 1889 Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Greater Johnstown

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Concurrent Technologies Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Concurrent Technologies Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Concurrent Technologies’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home