Pennsylvania · Nonprofit
CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,336,624 to it, the largest being NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ($3,596,481). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2025
- $101M
- Funders on record
- 4
- Grants received
- $4.3M
- Net assets
- $68M
What Concurrent Technologies Corporation does
Mission
Concurrent Technologies Corporation (CTC) provides applied scientific research & development services, in the public interest, to develop innovative technology and management solutions.
As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.
Programs
The purpose of this contract is to provide professional services to support the Force Safety and Occupational Health(FSOH)in meeting policy objectives. The objective of the contract is to support an integrated, comprehensive SOH program designed to reduce mishap, injury and occupational illness risk, and enable an enduring safety culture across the Department. Provide on and offsite technical, analytic, safety, engineering, and other expertise required to support the Department's enterprise safety risk management objectives. Assist to maintain DoD databases in support of the FSOH policy objectives. Provide a combination of professional services and ancillary IT services and supplies to support the gathering, analysis, and dissemination of data related to the occupational safety goals of the FSOH.
$16,244,736 spent$16,700,371 earned by the program19% of program spendingThe Interboundary Secure Information Sharing (ISIS) Program will develop a new cross domain system, the Next Generation Cross Domain Solution (NGCDS), that will consolidate the functionality of several existing cross domain systems and incorporate new cross domain technologies to provide a comprehensive cross domain capability for enterprise and cloud computing environments. The ISIS Program will also provide support for a number of existing cross domain systems until such time as the functionality of those systems is incorporated into the NGCDS. The scope of this effort shall include development, modification, testing, assembly, delivery, installation, training, troubleshooting support, and logistics support for existing and new cross domain systems and existing and new cross domain technologies.
$9,560,156 spent$9,332,015 earned by the program11% of program spendingThe purpose of this contract is to support MCICOM's alignment with Congressional legislation, Department of Defense strategic direction, and Fleet Marine Force requirements targeting climate, energy resilience, and Force Design. Contractor services are required to support different sections of the USMC, in addressing the USMC's energy security objectives. The support sets overarching policy and Program direction; Provides technical expertise for energy planning and management and utility systems, policy recommendations for energy and utility requirements, project implementation guidance and strategies, centralized energy information data management, transportation operations, communications and outreach.
$8,104,429 spent$8,589,487 earned by the program9% of program spendingOther program services, not described on the e-filed return.
$52,358,475 spentof which $163,491 as grants$65,452,058 earned by the program61% of program spending
The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $86,267,796.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $73M to $86M (+18%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 95% · 2018 96% · 2019 93% · 2020 94% · 2021 93% · 2022 92% · 2023 92% · 2024 92% · 2025 91%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
91% of CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (36% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Board chair
Honorable Jeffrey K Harris
Board Chairman
As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 3 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $350k → $120k.
1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 83% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 81% · 2018 62% · 2019 100% · 2020 98% · 2021 97% · 2022 99% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION draws 99% of its grant income from funders outside Pennsylvania, across 3 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $15k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 29 science & tech nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 29 science & tech nonprofits over $100M, FY2025
Government funding CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION receives
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $388.9M on record.
- Department of Defense$305.1M
- General Services Administration$66.8M
- Department of Homeland Security$13.7M
- Department of Health and Human Services$2.5M
- Department of the Interior$480k
- Department of Energy$150k
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Organizations like CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Pennsylvania
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
87% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
99%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 2 states
Part of a family of 1 related entity
- CTC Enterprise Ventures Corporation · corp_trust
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION?
- CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,336,624 to it, the largest being NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ($3,596,481). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION have?
- IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $4,336,624 in grants to CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION?
- NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY is the largest funder on record, with $3,596,481 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Pennsylvania. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing