· Public charity
Community Shares of Wisconsin Inc
Community shares of wisconsin (csw), together with its donors and approximately 70 member nonprofits, addresses social, economic, and environmental problems through grassroots activities, advocacy, research and public education.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 61 grants below total $1,010,151 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,054,506 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $44,355 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k17 grants · $128k
- $10k–50k43 grants · $793k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $89k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GAY STRAIGHT ALLIANCE FOR SAFE SCHOOLS INCORPORATED | $89,364 |
| WI LITERACY | $33,051 |
| FRIENDS OF WISCONSIN STATE PARKS | $32,427 |
| ACLU OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION | $29,161 |
| LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF WI | $29,030 |
| RAPE CRISIS CENTER | $27,554 |
| SOUTHERN WISCONSIN BIRD ALLIANCE | $26,293 |
| RIVER ALLIANCE OF WISCONSIN | $24,535 |
| OUTREACH | $24,103 |
| FREEDOM INC | $23,768 |
| TENANT RESOURCE CENTER | $23,117 |
| WI WETLANDS ASSOCIATION | $22,933 |
| CLEAN WISCONSIN | $22,478 |
| MIDWEST ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES | $20,655 |
| BAYVIEW FOUNDATION | $20,094 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $663k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
73 repeat relationships — 60 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GSGAY STRAIGHT ALLIANCE FOR SAFE SCHOOLS INCORPORATED8× · 2017–2024 · $489k · revenue +230%
- RCRAPE CRISIS CENTER INC8× · 2017–2024 · $280k · revenue +118%
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $280k · revenue +83%
Funded once
- HIHMONG INSTITUTE INCORPORATEDgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $34k · revenue +43%
- NWNAACP WISCONSIN STATE CONFERENCEone grant, 2022 · $12k
RAZOM INCone grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue -65%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.
To advance progressive values, ideas and policies through research, policy, networking, advocacy and public education.
Wisconsin progress recruits, trains, elects, and develops progressive candidates and leaders at the local and state legislative levels.
Wisconsin progress institute exists to empower wisconsin's locally elected leaders with the tools, training, and support they need to be effective, values-driven public servants.
The purpose of the association shall be to restore and conserve wisconsin's waterfowl and wetland resources; to educate state waterfowlers during their progression from natural resource consumer to steward; and to promote governmental…
Citizen action of wisconsin - an issue-focused coalition of individuals and organizations committed to achieving racial, social, economic, and environmental justice
Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.
Renew wisconsin leads and accelerates the transformation to wisconsin's renewable energy future through advocacy, education, and collaboration.
Bring about the sustained regeneration, improvement, and management of the physical environment by developing community-based partnerships that empower people, businesses, and organizations to promote environmental, economic, and social…
To protect, conserve, and enhance wisconsin's natural resources by advocating for and supporting county conservation efforts, for current and future generations.
Wisconsin principles (wp) is a 501(c)(4) non-profit organization dedicated to preserving conservative values in the state of wisconsin. committed to fiscal conservatism, educational choice, and individual liberty, we strive to empower…
The wcmp will grow and nurture the mep's impact in the state of wisconsin by engaging and aligning the best possible resources to help small and medium-sized manufacturers reach their potential.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fair Wisconsin Education Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hmong Institute Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GAY STRAIGHT ALLIANCE FOR SAFE SCHOOLS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds RAPE CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF WISCONSIN STATE PARKS INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS FORWARD INC ↗
- Who funds LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds CLEAN WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds END DOMESTIC ABUSE WISCONSIN THE WI COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOME INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN DEMOCRACY CAMPAIGN INC ↗
- Who funds Back Porch Radio Broadcasting Inc ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN LITERACY INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN WETLANDS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds BAYVIEW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EMBOLDEN WI INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN CONSERVATION VOICES INC ↗
- Who funds MIDWEST ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds THE RIVER ALLIANCE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN WISCONSIN BIRD ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds REAP FOOD GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds TENANT RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMON WEALTH DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSING INITIATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHRYSALIS INC ↗
- Who funds DISABILITY RIGHTS WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN COUNCIL OF THE BLIND AND VISUA ↗
- Who funds WOMEN IN TRANSITION INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN EARLY CHILDHOOD ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE PROGRESSIVE INC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL ACTION OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY INC ↗
- Who funds FAIRSHARE CSA COALITION ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN WOMEN'S NETWORK ↗
- Who funds FAIR WISCONSIN EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds GATHERING WATERS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY GROUNDWORKS INC ↗
- Who funds ABC FOR HEALTH INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Madison Gas and Electric Foundation Inc · Madison Community Foundation · The Evjue Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Trustage Foundation Inc · The Roots and Wings Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Endres Manufacturing Foundation Inc · United Way of Dane County Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Ascendium Education Solutions Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Shares of Wisconsin Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.