Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Community Shares Inc

Community shares mission is supporting tennessee social change organizations in order to promote a more just and caring community.

$9k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$295kAnimals$225kYouth Development$128kEnvironment$107kCivil Rights$69kPublic Benefit$44kHuman Services$41kEducation$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $228k
$27,205
Median grant
3
States reached
$972k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$40,733
Individual grant recipient$39,383
ORAU$33,106
Individual grant recipient$27,816
MECC$27,205
TECC$24,860
METRO SCHOOLS$18,064
MTSU$16,334
Individual grant recipient$8,860
NES$6,162
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER: $6k → 12%DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$803k · 17 repeat orgs$357k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against -19% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
11

Total granted

$803k
$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
-19%

Still filing today

88%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $243k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
EnvironmentCivil RightsHealthPhilanthropyAnimalsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE TENNESSEE VALLEY INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $181k · revenue +60%
  • IN
    IJAMS NATURE CENTER INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $59k · revenue +112%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER MEMPHIS REGION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $57k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • DU
    DRUMS UP GUNS DO
    one grant, 2023 · $57k
  • NS
    NEXT STEP INITIA
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • TH
    TN HEALTHCARE CAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2019 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tennessee Advocates for Planned Parenthood Inc

The organization wishes to encourage and protect informed individual choice regarding reproductive health care.

Education
2
Imagine Tennessee Better Inc

Social Welfare

3
Tennessee Democracy Network

The Tennessee Democracy Network is a nonprofit civic incubator for relational organizing and civic literacy initiatives that develop and deepen cultures of nonpartisan democratic engagement in Tennessee.

Public Benefit
4
Tennessee Advocacy Talk

Our mission is to increase the access and quality of social service resources through bettering norms and culture with advocacy, performance improvement strategies, and technology.

Health
5
Tennessee Clean Water Network

To identify, prevent, and remedy water pollution statewide through a network of allies and resources.

6
Tennessee River Rescues

we exist to spay and neuter unwanted pets in our local area trying to find them a home to thrive in until the end of their time

Animals
7
Tennessee Alliance for Progress

To create a sustainable green economy that benefits all

Health
8
Tennessee Geographic Alliance

Education

Education
9
Tennessee State Parks Conservancy

To support education, health and access programs that preserve, protect, and enhance Tennessee's natural areas and parks system.

Environment
10
Tennessee Justice Center Inc

The tennessee justice center (tjc) advocates on behalf of low-income tennesseans in areas of public policy having the greatest impact on their health and welfare.

Crime & Legal
11
Tennessee Public Safety Network

The Tennessee Public Safety Network was established to address the growing stress and trauma experienced by law enforcement and public safety personnel. We believe untreated stress profoundly impacts their physical and emotional well-being.

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Civic Tn

Civictn and its partners are working individually and collectively to create a more accessible, inclusive, and representative democracy by lifting up the voices of the disenfranchised, restoring the power and accessibility of the vote, and…

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nami Tennessee and the most unlike its peers is Build for Bees. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyParks & Land ConservationAnimal Shelter and Rescue S…Civil Rights Legal ServicesTheater & Performing ArtsDisability Services & Suppo…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%5%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr15%32%20–35yr12%55%35–55yr13%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr15%18%20–35yr12%65%35–55yr13%16%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
13%
1,211/9,529

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MIDDLE & EAST TENNESSE INC — $200,026 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MIDDLE & EAST TENNESSE INCDRUMS UP GUNS DO — $56,922 · OtherDRUMS UP GUNS DOPEOPLE FOR ANIMALS INC — $44,492 · OtherPEOPLE FOR ANIMALS INCIndividual grant recipient — $40,733 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $39,383 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTENNESSEE COALITION TO END DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE — $34,260 · OtherORAU — $33,106 · OtherTENNESSEE CITIZENS FOR WILDERNESS PLANNING — $29,410 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $27,816 · OtherMECC — $27,205 · OtherTECC — $24,860 · Other+14 more — $125,544 · Other+14 moreHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE TENNESSEE VALLEY INC — $180,652 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF…PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER MEMPHIS REGION INC — $57,043 · HealthNAMI TENNESSEE — $26,298 · HealthIJAMS NATURE CENTER INC — $58,672 · EnvironmentHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $11,548 · EnvironmentTENNESSEE ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL — $5,969 · EnvironmentBUILD FOR BEES — $5,720 · EnvironmentBLACK CHILDRENS INSTITUTE OF TENN — $35,316 · Civil RightsTENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION — $22,221 · Civil RightsTENNESSEANS FOR ALTERNATIVES TO THE DEATH PENALTY — $19,152 · Civil RightsAPPALACHIAN COMMUNITY FUND — $23,559 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY SHARES USA — $5,269 · PhilanthropyJUBILEE COMMUNITY ARTS INC — $24,779 · Arts & Culture
Other$683,757Animals$180,652Health$83,341Environment$81,909Civil Rights$76,689Philanthropy$28,828Arts & Culture$24,779

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE TENNESSEE VALLEY INC — $180,652 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetIJAMS NATURE CENTER INC — $58,672 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER MEMPHIS REGION INC — $57,043 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPEOPLE FOR ANIMALS INC — $44,492 over 6y, 5.8% of budgetBLACK CHILDRENS INSTITUTE OF TENN — $35,316 over 5y, 94% of budgetTENNESSEE COALITION TO END DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE — $34,260 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTENNESSEE CITIZENS FOR WILDERNESS PLANNING — $29,410 over 5y, 13% of budgetJUBILEE COMMUNITY ARTS INC — $24,779 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetAPPALACHIAN COMMUNITY FUND — $23,559 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetTENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION — $22,221 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTENNESSEANS FOR ALTERNATIVES TO THE DEATH PENALTY — $19,152 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetTennessee Scenic Rivers Association — $13,229 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $11,548 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $11,410 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNURTURE THE NEXT FKA PREVENT CHILD ABUSE TENNESSEE — $6,040 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBUILD FOR BEES — $5,720 over 1y, 31% of budgetTENNESSEE HEALTH CARE CAMPAIGN INC — $5,380 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY SHARES USA — $5,269 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S INTERNATIONAL SUMMER VILLAGES - SMOKY MOUNTAIN CHAPTER — $5,120 over 1y, 8.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee IncTN22.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · The Frist Foundation · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · Dorothy Cate and Thomas F Frist Foundation · The Healing Trust Formerly Baptist Healing Hospital Trust · Memorial Foundation Inc · East Tennessee Foundation · Hca Healthcare Foundation · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Community Shares Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Community Shares Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Community Shares Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $430k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph