Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Community Justice Project Inc

Community justice project consists of community lawyers.

$614k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$579k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Housing & Shelter$647kEmployment$358kCivil Rights$343kEnvironment$322kCommunity Improvement$213kHuman Services$208kReligion$148kPublic Benefit$121kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $578,745 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $613,745 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $35,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$578,745
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SMILE TRUST$578,745
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $600k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ORGANIZE FLORIDA EDUCATION FUND: $7k → 13%CENTER FOR SOCIAL CHANGE: $15k → 15%THE SMILE TRUST: $579k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 12 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
23

Total granted

$1.3M
$680k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+25%

Still filing today

75%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $579k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentHuman ServicesEmploymentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MW
    Miami Workers Center Inc
    4× · 2019–2023 · $358k · revenue +338%
  • CM
    CATALYST MIAMI INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $109k · revenue +10%
  • SC
    Southeast Climate & Energy Network
    3× · 2021–2023 · $106k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • NC
    NATIONAL COALITION OF 100 BLACK WOM
    one grant, 2022 · $92k
  • MC
    MIAMI CLIMATE ALLIANCE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $85k · revenue -88%
  • EE
    EARTH ETHICS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $54k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Miami Intergroup
2
Florida Rising Inc

Florida rising, inc. is an independent political organization bringing together black and brown communities to seize power and govern to advance social, economic and racial justice across florida.

Civil Rights
3
Miami-Dade Chamber of Commerce Inc

The mission of M-DCC is to create opportunities for economic and social transformation in our community. The vision of M-DCC envision a future where the diaspora of Black businesses thrive.

4
Miami Childrens Initiative Inc

The mission is to create a community-based network that develops coordinates and provides quality education accessible health care youth development programs opportunities for employment and safe neighborhoods for children and families…

Community Improvement
5
Florida Chapter of American Association of Black in Energy Inc

To provide direct input into the deliberations and developments of energy policies, regulations, emerging technologies, and environmental issues.

Environment
6
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
7
Miami Dade Transit Alliance Inc

Transit Alliance is a non-profit organization advocating for walkable streets, bikeable neighborhoods and better public transit. Our campaigns combine data-driven research, community engagement, and policy advocacy to get Miami moving…

Civil Rights
8
Engage Miami Inc

Engage miami, inc. is a civic organization that works to increase youth engagement within miami-dade by developing a culture of civic participation that is bold, creative, impactful and local.

9
University of Miami
10
Climate Leadership Council Inc

To develop and promote a carbon dividends framework - based on carbon fees whose revenues are rebated to citizens through dividends - as the most cost-effective, equitable, and politically viable climate solution.

Environment
11
Florida Coalition for the Homeless Inc

The Coalition is to eliminate homelessness by providing education on homelessness issues, advocating for issues that help homeless people, networking with advocates throughout Florida, and promoting involvement

12
Alianza Americas

The mission of Alianza Americas is to bring about a more inclusive, equitable and sustainable way of life for Latino immigrant communities living in the United States and across the americas. By working transnationally with partners from…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Local Initiatives Support Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Unity in the Family Ministry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyBlack Women & Economic Empo…Climate Action AdvocacyAffordable Housing Developm…Youth and Family ServicesRegional Business & Communi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%4%<5yr17%22%5–10yr21%35%10–20yr15%30%20–35yr10%9%35–55yr12%0%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%1%<5yr17%10%5–10yr21%52%10–20yr15%33%20–35yr10%4%35–55yr12%0%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 9% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
9%
3/35
the rest of the field
17%
7,165/42,731

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
18/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

IGLESIA EPISCOPAL JESUS DE NAZARET — $133,105 · OtherIGLESIA EPISCOPAL JESUS DE NAZARETIndividual grant recipient — $113,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNATIONAL COALITION OF 100 BLACK WOM — $92,000 · OtherNATIONAL COALITION OF 100 BLACK WOMMIAMI CLIMATE ALLIANCE INC — $85,000 · OtherMIAMI CLIMATE ALLIANCE INCTI AYITI PREPAREDNESS & RELIEF INST — $57,000 · OtherTI AYITI PREPAREDNESS & RELIEF INSTEARTH ETHICS INC — $54,000 · OtherEARTH ETHICS INCLA CASITA BORICUA — $50,000 · OtherLA CASITA BORICUANATIONAL COALITION OF 100 BLACK WOMEN INC — $41,105 · OtherPEOPLE ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESILIENCY GROUP INC — $30,000 · OtherFOOD & WATER WATCH — $41,105 · Other+9 more — $144,870 · Other+9 moreTHE SMILE TRUST — $578,745 · Human ServicesTHE SMILE TRUST+2 more — $21,700 · Human ServicesMiami Workers Center Inc — $357,690 · EmploymentMiami Workers C…ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ORGANIZING — $106,105 · Civil RightsALLIANCE FOR …FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC — $83,380 · Civil RightsFLORIDA RISIN…Florida Immigrant Coalition Inc — $66,405 · Civil RightsFlorida Immig…WECOUNT — $45,540 · Civil RightsWECOUNTALIANZA CENTER INC — $15,000 · Civil RightsCATALYST MIAMI INC — $109,205 · Community ImprovementCATALYST M…Struggle for Miamis Affordable and Sustainable Housing Incorporated — $68,573 · Community ImprovementStruggle f…LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $42,000 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INIT…THE ALLAPATTAH COLLABORATIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $20,000 · Community ImprovementTHE ALLAPA…Southeast Climate & Energy Network — $106,225 · EnvironmentRETHINK ENERGY FLORIDA INC — $39,772 · EnvironmentLOVE THE EVERGLADES MOVEMENT INC — $15,000 · EnvironmentDREAM IN GREEN INC — $10,000 · EnvironmentLead Coalition of Bay County — $42,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$841,185Human Services$600,445Employment$357,690Civil Rights$316,430Community Improvement$239,778Environment$170,997Crime & Legal$42,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SMILE TRUST — $578,745 over 1y, 25% of budgetMiami Workers Center Inc — $357,690 over 4y, 8.8% of budgetCATALYST MIAMI INC — $109,205 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSoutheast Climate & Energy Network — $106,225 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ORGANIZING — $106,105 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMIAMI CLIMATE ALLIANCE INC — $85,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetFLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC — $83,380 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetStruggle for Miamis Affordable and Sustainable Housing Incorporated — $68,573 over 3y, 14% of budgetFlorida Immigrant Coalition Inc — $66,405 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetWECOUNT — $45,540 over 2y, 11% of budgetLead Coalition of Bay County — $42,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $42,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COALITION OF 100 BLACK WOMEN INC — $41,105 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetFOOD & WATER WATCH — $41,105 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRETHINK ENERGY FLORIDA INC — $39,772 over 1y, 10% of budgetDADE COUNTY STREET RESPONSE INC — $22,500 over 2y, 12% of budgetFAMILY ACTION NETWORK MOVEMENT INC — $20,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTHE ALLAPATTAH COLLABORATIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLOVE THE EVERGLADES MOVEMENT INC — $15,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetALIANZA CENTER INC — $15,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTHE CLIMATE INITIATIVE — $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDREAM IN GREEN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA — $6,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Miami Foundation IncFL32.4× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · Allegany Franciscan Ministries Inc · Solutions Project Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · Tides Center · Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Tides Foundation · Miami Climate Alliance Inc · Florida Immigrant Coalition Inc · Hfsf Grants Management Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Community Justice Project Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 90%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Dream in Green Inc58% of income from government
  • The Children's Home Society of Florida6% of income from government
  • University of Miami5% of income from government
  • Alianza Center Inc0% of income from government
  • Rethink Energy Florida Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Community Justice Project Inc?

Find your warmest path to Community Justice Project Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph