Skip to content
Community Health Center Capital Fund Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Community Health Center Capital Fund Inc

Community health center capital fund, inc.

$1.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$1.7MCommunity Improvement$793kEnvironment$254k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$363,664
Median grant
3
States reached
$39M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS$1,230,625
CAPITAL LINK$363,664
COLLECTIVE ENERGY COMPANY LLC$253,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 45% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%LOWELL COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $13k → 8%CAPITAL LINK: $364k → 16%DELAWARE VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $10k → 22%COLLECTIVE ENERGY COMPANY LLC: $254k → 10%HARBOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $8k → 14%WHEELER CLINIC: $12k → 11%HEALTHCARE GEORGIA FOUNDATION INC: $46k → 13%MUSKINGUM VALLEY: $16k → 17%HEALTHPOINT: $12k → 9%WINNTRINITY: $14k → 24%MERCY MEDICAL: $18k → 24%NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $1.2M → 8%CAPITAL LINK: $306k → 16%CAPITAL LINK: $155k → 16%CAPITAL LINK: $129k → 16%CAPITAL LINK: $94k → 16%CAPITAL LINK: $42k → 16%CF NPP-2: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
MD
LA
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Grace Health Inc

To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.

Health
2
Community Health Services Inc

To provide medical services for the residents of the greater hartford connecticut area. to provide quality health care services to low and moderate income individuals in the greater hartford connecticut area regardless of ability to pay.

Health
3
Horizon Health Care Inc

Horizon health care, inc. provides rural communities with access to high-quality, affordable primary healthcare services.

Health
4
Lynn Community Health Inc

To provide comprehensive healthcare of the highest quality for everyone in the greater lynn community regardless of ability to pay.(continued on schedule o.)our strongest commitment is to assure access to care for underserved members of…

—
5
Harvard Street Neighborhood Health Center Inc

Harvard street neighborhood health center serves as the primary health resource to our community, through the delivery of comprehensive patient-centered medical care.

Health
6
Community Health Center of Cape Cod Inc

To improve the health of our community through the provision of equitable, patient centered, high quality, compassionate care to all, regardless of ability to pay.

Health
7
Portsmouth Community Health Center Inc

Hampton Roads Community Health Center is a not-for-profit comprehensive primary health care organization dedicated to providing quality and affordable health services in a safe environment to our communities.

—
8
The Healthcare Connection Inc

To provide quality, culturally sensitive and accessible primary health care services focusing on the medically underserved, underinsured, and uninsured residing in northern hamilton county and surrounding areas.

—
9
Westside Family Health Center

Westside Family Health Center provides comprehensive, high quality, cost effective health care in an educational and supportive environment that empowers patients to take an assertive role in caring for their well-being through all stages…

Health
10
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
11
Community Health Systems Inc

Operate primary health care clinics, ultrasound, ob/gyn and five pharmacies.

—
12
Community Health Center of Franklin County Incorporated

The full mission of the community health center of franklin county, inc is to maintain a community owned, responsive health center which promotes public health and well-being, and provides comprehensive preventative and primary care…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Delaware Valley Community Health Inc; the most unlike its peers is Georgia Health Initiative Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $1,230,625 · HealthNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INCCAPITAL LINK INC: $1,098,399 · HealthCAPITAL LINK INC+7 more: $91,875 · HealthCOLLECTIVE ENERGY COMPANY LLC: $253,750 · OtherCOLLECTIVE…DELAWARE VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $10,000 · OtherGEORGIA HEALTH INITIATIVE INC: $46,025 · Philanthropy
Health$2,420,899Other$263,750Philanthropy$46,025

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $1,230,625 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCAPITAL LINK INC: $1,098,399 over 6y, 8.9% of budgetGEORGIA HEALTH INITIATIVE INC: $46,025 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMercy Medical LLC: $17,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMuskingum Valley Health Center: $16,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOWELL COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHEELER CLINIC INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHPOINT: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDELAWARE VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARBOR COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $7,875 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Direct ReliefAmerican Cancer Socie…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Direct ReliefCA19× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Direct Relief · American Cancer Society Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Health Center Capital Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Health Center Capital Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 34%
  • Wheeler Clinic Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Lowell Community Health Center Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Capital Link Inc: 18% of income from government
  • National Association of Community Health Centers Inc: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Community Health Center Capital’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home