Skip to content
Community Health Center Assoc of Ms at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Community Health Center Assoc of Ms

The community health center association of mississippi represents the interests of its members in statewide efforts to improve access to health care for the medically under served and indigent population of mississippi.

$672k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$3.4M
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $32k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $638k
$75,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLAIBORNE COUNTY FAMILY HEALTH CENTER$89,560
OUTREACH HEALTH SERVICES$76,143
MALLORY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$75,125
JEFFERSON COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CENTER$75,036
CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI HEALTH SERVICES$75,000
THE PARTNERSHIP FOR A HEALTHY MS$70,619
GA CARMICHAEL FAMILY HEALTH CTR$64,998
AARON E HENRY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$61,484
FAMILY HEALTH CENTER$50,000
DELTA HEALTH CENTER$32,248
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 24%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 69% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%THE PARTNERSHIP FOR A HEALTHY MS: $71k → 10%GA CARMICHAEL FAMILY HEALTH CTR: $270k → 11%MANTACHIE RURAL HEALTH CARE INC: $266k → 13%ACCESS FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES: $268k → 15%FAMILY HEALTH CENTER: $270k → 18%OUTREACH HEALTH SERVICES: $263k → 22%CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI HEALTH SERVICES: $75k → 23%GREATER MERIDIAN: $15k → 24%DELTA HEALTH CENTER: $244k → 29%CLAIBORNE COUNTY FAMILY HEALTH CENTER: $270k → 33%JEFFERSON COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CENTER: $270k → 34%MALLORY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $8k → 35%AARON E HENRY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $270k → 36%GA CARMICHAEL FAMILY HEALTH CTR: $65k → 11%FAMILY HEALTH CENTER: $50k → 18%OUTREACH HEALTH SERVICES: $76k → 22%DELTA HEALTH CENTER: $32k → 29%CLAIBORNE COUNTY FAMILY HEALTH CENTER: $90k → 33%JEFFERSON COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CENTER: $75k → 34%AARON E HENRY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $61k → 36%GA CARMICHAEL FAMILY HEALTH CTR: $11k → 11%FAMILY HEALTH CENTER: $9k → 18%DELTA HEALTH CENTER: $7k → 29%AARON E HENRY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $7k → 36%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 8 repeat orgs$715k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$2.7M
$569k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+45%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $146k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    Claiborne County Family Health Center Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $359k · revenue +37%
  • DA
    Dr Arenia C Mallory Community Health Center Inc
    5× · 2017–2025 · $354k · revenue +72%
  • GF
    GACARMICHAEL FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $346k · revenue +103%

Funded once

  • AF
    ACCESS FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INCgraduated
    2× · 2021–2024 · $268k · revenue +45%
  • JC
    Jefferson Comprehensive Health Center
    3× · 2020–2024 · $266k · revenue +4%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $16k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Health Care Clinic Inc

To provide quality, accessible, and cost effective primary health care services.

Health
2
Gulf Coast Health Center Inc

To provide accessible, affordable, quality family health, dental, vision and behavioral care within the Gulf Coast Service areas.

Health
3
Southeast Community Health Systems

The mission of Southeast Community Health Systems is to provide quality, affordable healthcare to all patients in underserved areas and to improve the health and wellness of the communities we serve.

—
4
Leflore County Health Center

To provide healthcare to low income persons

Health
5
Primary Health Services Center Inc

To provide quality, comprehensive, compassionate, and culturally appropriate primary and preventive healthcare services to residents in medically underserved North Louisiana.

Health
6
Christian Community Health Center

To provide high quality primary health care and related services to the community regardless of the ability to pay, in a manner which demonstrates in work and deed the love of Jesus Christ.

Philanthropy
7
Jonesboro Church Health Center Inc

Our purpose is to address health disparities reduce barriers to care by offering essential medical services to those most in need. Our vision is that every person in our community has access to healthcare regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
8
Central North Al Health Service Inc

Provide primary health care to mostly low-income and underserved persons.

Health
9
Atascosa Health Center Inc

Health care services are provided to low to moderate income families who are residents of South Texas. Services are provided at a low cost are based on abiilty to pay base. Approximately 18,022 patients were served in the fiscal year.

Health
10
Capitol City Family Health Center Inc

To provide quality, affordable health care to all.

Health
11
Community First Health Centers

We provide high quality, patient centered health care that is respectful, compassionate and accessible to all members of our community.

Health
12
Primary Care Providers for a Healthy Feliciana Inc

To provide primary care to an under served rural area.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is East Central Mississippi Healthcare Inc; the most unlike its peers is Gacarmichael Family Health Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Claiborne County Family Health Center Inc: $359,256 · HealthClaiborne County Family Health Center IncGACARMICHAEL FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC: $346,053 · HealthGACARMICHAEL FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INCOutreach Health Services Inc: $339,406 · HealthOutreach Health Services IncAaron E Henry Community Health Services Center Inc: $338,510 · HealthAaron E Henry Community Health Services Center IncFamily Health Center Inc: $328,791 · HealthFamily Health Center IncACCESS FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $267,870 · HealthACCESS FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INCJefferson Comprehensive Health Center: $265,836 · HealthJefferson Comprehensive Health Center+2 more: $75,633 · HealthDr Arenia C Mallory Community Health Center Inc: $353,842 · OtherDr Arenia C Mallory Community Health…MANTACHIE RURAL HEALTH CARE INC: $344,827 · OtherMANTACHIE RURAL HEALTH CARE INCDELTA HEALTH CENTER INC: $282,764 · OtherDELTA HEALTH CENTER INCCENTRAL MISSISSIPPI HEALTH SERVICES: $75,000 · OtherCENTRAL MISSISSIPPI HEALTH SERVICES+2 more: $30,636 · Other
Health$2,321,355Other$1,087,069

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetClaiborne County Family Health Center Inc: $359,256 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetDr Arenia C Mallory Community Health Center Inc: $353,842 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetGACARMICHAEL FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC: $346,053 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetMANTACHIE RURAL HEALTH CARE INC: $344,827 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetOutreach Health Services Inc: $339,406 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetAaron E Henry Community Health Services Center Inc: $338,510 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetFamily Health Center Inc: $328,791 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetDELTA HEALTH CENTER INC: $282,764 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetACCESS FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $267,870 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetJefferson Comprehensive Health Center: $265,836 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetTHE PARTNERSHIP FOR A HEALTHY MISSISSIPPI INC: $70,619 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetSOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI RURAL HEALTH INITIATIVE INC: $5,014 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Direct ReliefMAGnet HCCNDelta Dental Communit…Vanderbilt University…
Direct ReliefCA33.2× affinity15 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Direct Relief · MAGnet HCCN · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · Vanderbilt University Medical Center

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Health Center Assoc of Ms funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Health Center Assoc of Ms. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Health Center Assoc of Ms’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home