Skip to content
Community Foundation of Switzerland County Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Community foundation

Community Foundation of Switzerland County Inc

Connecting people who care with causes that matter for good for ever for switzerland county.

$809k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$377k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$925kHealth$382kPublic Benefit$141kArts & Culture$123kHuman Services$115kPublic Safety & Disaster$76kYouth Development$45kRecreation & Sports$34kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $517,140, the rows itemized in this filing. The $809,024 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $291,884 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $107k
  • $250k+1 grant · $377k
$10,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INCOMPASS HEALTHCARE$376,603
TOWN OF PATRIOT$32,727
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SWITZERLAND CO$26,421
SWITZERLAND COUNTY GOVERNMENT$24,900
GIRLS INC OF JEFFERSON COUNTY$11,915
SWITZERLAND COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION$10,600
SWITZERLAND COUNTY FFA CHAPTER$9,145
SWISS WINE FESTIVAL$7,435
JEFF CRAIG FIRE AND RESCUE$6,800
SWITZERLAND COUNTY EMERGENCY RESPONSE$5,394
BROADS ON BOARDS LLC$5,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%LIFETIME RESOURCES: $12k → 11%SAFE PASSAGE INC: $7k → 12%LIFETIME RESOURCES: $6k → 11%SWITZERLAND COUNTY YMCA: $25k → 14%SWITZERLAND COUNTY YMCA: $21k → 14%SHERIFF'S OFFICE: $13k → 14%SWITZERLAND COUNTY YMCA: $9k → 14%SWITZERLAND COUNTY YMCA: $8k → 14%SWITZERLAND COUNTY YMCA: $5k → 14%SWITZERLAND COUNTY YMCA: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 17 repeat orgs$157k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
16

Total granted

$1.9M
$151k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+4%

Still filing today

71%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC
    2× · 2022–2025 · $382k · revenue +3%
  • SC
    SWITZ-COR CORPORATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $371k · revenue ×23
  • IT
    IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $78k · revenue +208%

Funded once

  • SC
    SWITZERLAND COUNTY HOUSING INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +380%
  • EE
    EAST ENTERPRISE REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT
    one grant, 2019 · $16k
  • MC
    MOOREFIELD COMMUNITY FIRE DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Switzerland County Tourism Inc

To contribute to the economic health of switzerland county by promoting, marketing, building & sustaining the vital tourism industry through the attraction of visitors to stay, shop, dine, tour & recreate in our historically rich &…

Community Improvement
2
Switzerland Co Public Schools

To provide educational resources for the students, staff and faculty and schools in the vevay area

Education
3
Switzerland County Public Library

Community service - providing for a lifelong learning and leisure pursuit to switzerland county residents through free lending of resources and programming.

Education
4
Spring Creek Volunteer Fire Department

Provide fire protection first reponse medical to all residents twp#8

Public Safety & Disaster
5
German Township Volunteer Fire Dept

To provide fire protection and rescue services to the residences and business in german township, bartholomew county, indiana

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Scotts Bluff County Agricultural Society

Operation and maintenance of the scotts bluff county fairgrounds and annual county fair

Food & Nutrition
7
Swift Creek Fire Department

Provide fire protection and rescue services to citizens in the swift creek fire district.

—
8
East Sullivan County Volunteer Fire Dept Inc

Volunteer fire department

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Swiss Village Inc

Pursuing Life Together through Leadership, Innovation, Faith and Engagement.

Human Services
10
Economic Development Corporation of Wayne County Indiana

To promote and support economic development, growth and expansion within the wayne county, indiana area.

Community Improvement
11
Scott Township Volunteer Fire

Fire and ems protection

—
12
Lawrence County Industrial Development Council

To promote business development within lawrence county, illinois.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southeastern Indiana Economic Opportunity Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Switz-Cor Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
11/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SWITZERLAND COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION: $473,061 · OtherSWITZERLAND COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATIONSWITZ-COR CORPORATION: $371,422 · OtherSWITZ-COR CORPORATIONSWITZERLAND COUNTY GOVERNMENT: $121,691 · OtherSWITZERLAND COUNTY GOVERNMENTIndividual grant recipient: $87,965 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+21 more: $338,483 · Other+21 moreCOMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $381,708 · HealthCOMMUNITY MENTAL HEAL…SWITZERLAND COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $72,593 · Human ServicesLifetime Resources Inc: $30,089 · Human ServicesSAFE PASSAGE INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $77,506 · EducationSOUTHEASTERN INDIANA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION: $6,195 · EducationGIRLS INCORPORATED OF JEFFERSON CO: $25,876 · Youth DevelopmentCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN INDIANA: $8,750 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SWITZERLAND COUNTY INC: $26,421 · PhilanthropySWITZERLAND COUNTY HOUSING INC: $25,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,392,622Health$381,708Human Services$109,682Education$83,701Youth Development$34,626Philanthropy$26,421Housing & Shelter$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $381,708 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $77,506 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSWITZERLAND COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $72,593 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetHISTORIC VEVAY INC: $45,100 over 2y, 40% of budgetSWISS WINE FESTIVAL INC: $44,685 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetLifetime Resources Inc: $30,089 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SWITZERLAND COUNTY INC: $26,421 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF JEFFERSON CO: $25,876 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetSWITZERLAND COUNTY HOUSING INC: $25,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetSwitzerland County Historical Society Inc: $23,400 over 2y, 15% of budgetJEFF-CRAIG FIRE AND RESCUE INC: $22,912 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetSWITZERLAND COUNTY 4-H FAIRBOARD: $19,527 over 2y, 13% of budgetEAST ENTERPRISE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $17,670 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetMOOREFIELD COMMUNITY FIRE DEPARTMENT: $15,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN INDIANA: $8,750 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSAFE PASSAGE INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSwitzerland County Emergency Medical Services Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN INDIANA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION: $6,195 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSWITZERLAND COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $5,038 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vevay Switzerland Cou…Dearborn Community Fo…Switzerland County To…Community Foundation …Civista Charitable Fo…United Way of Greater…Amazonsmile Foundation
Vevay Switzerland County Foundation IncIN26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vevay Switzerland County Foundation Inc · Dearborn Community Foundation Inc · Switzerland County Tourism Inc · Community Foundation of Madison and Jefferson County Inc · Civista Charitable Foundation Fka Ucb Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Foundation of Switzerland County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Foundation of Switzerland County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Foundation of Switzerland County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home