· Public charity
Community Connections Foundation Inc
To operate exclusively for charitable and educational purposes; and to receive, administer and distribute funds in connection with any activities related to the above purposes.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $125,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $131,750 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $6,750 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $90k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Boston Medical Center | $25,000 |
| Bright Spirit Childrens Foundation | $25,000 |
| My Brothers Keeper | $10,000 |
| Cystic Fibrosis Foundatoin | $10,000 |
| Spencer Education Foundation Inc | $10,000 |
| Boston Healthcare for the Homeless | $10,000 |
| Community Health Resources | $5,000 |
| Travis Mills | $5,000 |
| Girl Scouts of Southeastern NE | $5,000 |
| Watertown Boys & Girls Club | $5,000 |
| ALSACSt Jude Childrens Research | $5,000 |
| Boys & Girls Club of Providence | $5,000 |
| Campus School at Boston College | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION7× · 2017–2024 · $133k · revenue +88%- CSCOTTING SCHOOL INC5× · 2017–2021 · $91k · revenue +28%
- MHMIDDLESEX HUMAN SERVICE AGENCY INC5× · 2017–2021 · $78k · revenue +77%
Funded once
- DDONORSCHOOSEORGone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +1%
- ALAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSNgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue +122%
- NENEW ENGLAND PARKINSONS RIDEone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.
Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.
Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.
To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.
Care dimensions, inc. (cd) enriches quality of life by providing expert care, support, education, and consultation for those affected by life limiting illness, death, and loss.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish of New Hampshire Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds COTTING SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds MIDDLESEX HUMAN SERVICE AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds THE FRANCIS OUIMET SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Rodman For Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds BOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds SPENCER EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds South Shore Mental Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds VNA Care Network Inc ↗
- Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
- Who funds NURTURY INC ↗
- Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
- Who funds LIFE SCIENCE CARES INC ↗
- Who funds THE PROVIDENCE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND PARKINSONS RIDE ↗
- Who funds WATERTOWN BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BOTTOM LINE INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds My Brother's Keeper Inc ↗
- Who funds SPRINGFIELD JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds ONE ACRE FUND ↗
- Who funds Camp Casco Inc ↗
- Who funds DRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHEASTERN NEW ENGLAND ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL VERMONT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC ↗
- Who funds TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CARITAS COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds CARDINAL CUSHING CENTERS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Fidelity Foundation · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Citizens Charitable Foundation · Amica Companies Foundation · Amelia Peabody Charitable Fund Trust · Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Joy In Childhood Foundation Inc · Salem Five Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way of Rhode Island Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Connections Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Capstone Community Action Inc — 84% of income from government
- Community Health Resources Inc — 79% of income from government
- Nurtury Inc — 49% of income from government
- South Shore Mental Health Center Inc — 46% of income from government
- Cardinal Cushing Centers Inc — 40% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Horizons for Homeless Children — 21% of income from government
- Middlesex Human Service Agency Inc — 17% of income from government
- Springfield Jewish Community Center Inc — 14% of income from government
- Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc — 8% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Watertown Boys and Girls' Club Inc — 3% of income from government
- Camp Harbor View Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Central Vermont Chamber of Commerce Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Bottom Line Inc — 0% of income from government
- Cotting School Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Community Connections Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Community Connections Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.