Skip to content
Community Action Partnership Association of Idaho Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Community Action Partnership Association of Idaho Inc

Community action partnership association of idaho's vision is to be idaho's trusted voice and expert on eliminating the barriers for exiting poverty.community action partnership association of idaho's mission is to provide support and leadership through the statewide network approach in being an advocate for the impoverished, educating…

$1.3M
Granted FY2021
6
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$465k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Human Services$61MFood & Nutrition$221k
02FY2021 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $1,277,458, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,312,458 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $35,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • $50k–250k4 grants · $491k
  • $250k+2 grants · $787k
$182,260
Median grant
1
States reached
$138k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EL-ADA INC$464,502
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC$322,424
EASTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC$182,260
METRO COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$151,571
SOUTHEASTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC$79,037
SOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC$77,664
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $32.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%EL-ADA INC: $3.4M → 8%COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO INC: $337k → 11%Community Action Partnership: $4.0M → 11%WESTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $1.5M → 12%El-Ada Community Action Agency: $3.3M → 8%Community Council of Idaho: $305k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $3.7M → 11%Western Idaho Community Action Partnership: $1.3M → 12%El-Ada Inc: $3.1M → 8%Community Council of Idaho: $248k → 11%Community Action Partnership: $3.2M → 11%Western Idaho Community Action Partnership: $1.2M → 12%EL-ADA INC: $2.6M → 8%COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO INC: $131k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $2.8M → 11%WESTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $993k → 12%EL-ADA INC: $465k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $322k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$61M · 9 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2021, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
0

Total granted

$61M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
    5× · 2017–2021 · $14M · revenue +29% · 54% of their budget
  • EI
    El-Ada Inc Community Action Partnership
    5× · 2017–2021 · $13M · revenue +3% · 59% of their budget
  • EI
    EASTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $8.4M · revenue +27%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Community Action Partnership of Middle Alabama Inc

    Providing low income individuals home energy assistance and providing emergency assitance as needed

    —
    2
    Community Action of Southeast Iowa

    The organization is dedicated to alleviating the conditions and causes of poverty by building partnerships and strengthening people through quality services. community action of southeast iowa administers programs funded or supported by…

    —
    3
    Community Action Commission of Fayette County

    Administers grants and contracts to help the lives of those individuals who fall below the poverty level.

    —
    4
    Community Action Center

    The center provides subsidized housing, weatherization services, emergency services, energy assistance and nutrition education and supplemental food to low income individuals and families in whitman county.

    Human Services
    5
    Community Action of Eastern Iowa

    Community action of eastern iowa respectfully partners with people to improve their health, finances, and education.

    Community Improvement
    6
    Community Action Agency Inc

    To aid low income families with early education, energy assistance, nutrition help and other services.

    Human Services
    7
    Impact Community Action Partnership Inc

    Reducing the barriers and burdens that families in poverty experience by increasing access to essential needs.

    —
    8
    Community Action for Improvement Inc

    The mission of community action for improvement, inc. is to build sustainable communities with partners by providing services and resources utilizing the whole family approach with low-income households to help reduce the burdens of…

    —
    9
    West Central Community Action

    In partnership with state and federal government, our mission is to administer programs designed to help residents in our 10-county region of southwest iowa achieve self-sufficiency.

    Human Services
    10
    Northwest Community Action Inc

    Our mission is to stimulate a focusing of all available resources upon the goal of enabling area low-income families and individuals of all ages to attain skills, knowledge, and motivations, and secure the opportunities needed for them to…

    Human Services
    11
    Northeast Iowa Community Action Corp

    Through dynamic partnerships, quality family services, advocacy and education, neicac advances community development and improves social and economic conditions for individuals and families with limited resources.

    Human Services
    12
    Muskegon-Oceana Community Action Partnership Inc

    Through dedicated staff and community partnerships we provide services, resources, education and advocacy to improve the quality of life for all residents of muskegon and oceana counties.

    —
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southeastern Idaho Community Action Agency Inc; the most unlike its peers is Community Action Partnership. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    5
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    8/9
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $13,945,370 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIPEl-Ada Inc Community Action Partnership: $12,876,953 · Human ServicesEl-Ada Inc Community Action PartnershipWESTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $4,945,361 · Human ServicesWESTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC+1 more: $1,021,598 · Human ServicesEASTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $8,393,062 · OtherEASTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INCSOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $7,463,541 · OtherSOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INCSOUTHEASTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $6,588,992 · OtherSOUTHEASTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INCMETRO COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $5,560,267 · OtherMETRO COMMUNITY SERVICES INCIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $221,488 · Food & Nutrition
    Human Services$32,789,282Other$28,005,862Food & Nutrition$221,488

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $13,945,370 over 5y, 54% of budgetEl-Ada Inc Community Action Partnership: $12,876,953 over 5y, 59% of budgetEASTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $8,393,062 over 5y, 22% of budgetSOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $7,463,541 over 5y, 46% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $6,588,992 over 5y, 44% of budgetMETRO COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $5,560,267 over 5y, 34% of budgetWESTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $4,945,361 over 4y, 18% of budgetCOMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO INC: $1,021,598 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $221,488 over 3y, 0.2% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

    Idaho Community Found…
    Idaho Community Foundation IncID13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Community Action Partnership Association of Idaho Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Action Partnership Association of Idaho Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Community Action Partnership Association of Idaho’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home