Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Community Action Partnership Association of Idaho Inc

Community action partnership association of idaho's vision is to be idaho's trusted voice and expert on eliminating the barriers for exiting poverty.community action partnership association of idaho's mission is to provide support and leadership through the statewide network approach in being an advocate for the impoverished, educating…

$1.3M
Granted FY2021
6
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$465k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2021 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $1,277,458 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,312,458 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $35,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • $50k–250k4 grants · $491k
  • $250k+2 grants · $787k
$182,260
Median grant
1
States reached
$138k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EL-ADA INC$464,502
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC$322,424
EASTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC$182,260
METRO COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$151,571
SOUTHEASTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC$79,037
SOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC$77,664
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $32.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%EL-ADA INC: $3.4M → 8%COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO INC: $337k → 11%Community Action Partnership: $4.0M → 11%WESTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $1.5M → 12%El-Ada Community Action Agency: $3.3M → 8%Community Council of Idaho: $305k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $3.7M → 11%Western Idaho Community Action Partnership: $1.3M → 12%El-Ada Inc: $3.1M → 8%Community Council of Idaho: $248k → 11%Community Action Partnership: $3.2M → 11%Western Idaho Community Action Partnership: $1.2M → 12%EL-ADA INC: $2.6M → 8%COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO INC: $131k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $2.8M → 11%WESTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $993k → 12%EL-ADA INC: $465k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $322k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$61M · 9 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2021, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
0

Total granted

$61M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
    5× · 2017–2021 · $14M · revenue +29% · 54% of their budget
  • EI
    El-Ada Inc Community Action Partnership
    5× · 2017–2021 · $13M · revenue +3% · 59% of their budget
  • EI
    EASTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $8.4M · revenue +27%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Community Action Partnership of Middle Alabama Inc

    Providing low income individuals home energy assistance and providing emergency assitance as needed

    2
    Community Action Commission of Fayette County

    Administers grants and contracts to help the lives of those individuals who fall below the poverty level.

    3
    Community Action of Eastern Iowa

    Community action of eastern iowa respectfully partners with people to improve their health, finances, and education.

    Community Improvement
    4
    Community Action Partnership of Central Illinois Inc

    Agency provides community assistance to low income families and individuals including assistance with utility bills, home weatherization, emergency housing

    Human Services
    5
    Community Action Center

    The center provides subsidized housing, weatherization services, emergency services, energy assistance and nutrition education and supplemental food to low income individuals and families in whitman county.

    Human Services
    6
    Community Action of Southeast Iowa

    The organization is dedicated to alleviating the conditions and causes of poverty by building partnerships and strengthening people through quality services. community action of southeast iowa administers programs funded or supported by…

    7
    West Central Community Action

    In partnership with state and federal government, our mission is to administer programs designed to help residents in our 10-county region of southwest iowa achieve self-sufficiency.

    Human Services
    8
    Muskegon-Oceana Community Action Partnership Inc

    Through dedicated staff and community partnerships we provide services, resources, education and advocacy to improve the quality of life for all residents of muskegon and oceana counties.

    9
    Mid-Iowa Community Action Inc

    Mica helps families experencing poverty meet their needs, build on their strengths, and achieve their goals.

    Community Improvement
    10
    Community Action Agency of Southern New Mexico Inc

    Caasnm is a 60 year-old new mexico statewide health and social services not for profit with a mission of uplifting low-income families by connecting communities, encouraging family wellness, empowering families, and bridging resources.

    Human Services
    11
    Northeast Iowa Community Action Corp

    Through dynamic partnerships, quality family services, advocacy and education, neicac advances community development and improves social and economic conditions for individuals and families with limited resources.

    Human Services
    12
    Community Action Board

    To partner with the community to eliminate poverty and create social change through advocacy and essential services.

    Employment

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southeastern Idaho Community Action Agency Inc and the most unlike its peers is Community Action Partnership. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    5
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    8/9
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP — $13,945,370 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIPEl-Ada Inc Community Action Partnership — $12,876,953 · Human ServicesEl-Ada Inc Community Action PartnershipWESTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC — $4,945,361 · Human ServicesWESTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC+1 more — $1,021,598 · Human ServicesEASTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC — $8,393,062 · OtherEASTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INCSOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC — $7,463,541 · OtherSOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INCSOUTHEASTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $6,588,992 · OtherSOUTHEASTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INCMETRO COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $5,560,267 · OtherMETRO COMMUNITY SERVICES INCIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE — $221,488 · Food & Nutrition
    Human Services$32,789,282Other$28,005,862Food & Nutrition$221,488

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP — $13,945,370 over 5y, 54% of budgetEl-Ada Inc Community Action Partnership — $12,876,953 over 5y, 59% of budgetEASTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC — $8,393,062 over 5y, 22% of budgetSOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC — $7,463,541 over 5y, 46% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $6,588,992 over 5y, 44% of budgetMETRO COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $5,560,267 over 5y, 34% of budgetWESTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC — $4,945,361 over 4y, 18% of budgetCOMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO INC — $1,021,598 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE — $221,488 over 3y, 0.2% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

    Idaho Community Foundation IncID13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Community Action Partnership Association of Idaho Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph