· Public charity
CommuniCare
To promote community based behavioral healthcare by providing Crisis,Latino and Family Support Services.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k1 grant · $46k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $754k
- $250k+2 grants · $975k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BHcare Inc | $545,000 |
| Bridges Heathcare Inc | $430,000 |
| CASA MAAS | $177,405 |
| Fair Haven Community Health Center | $177,054 |
| Hispanos Unidos | $104,481 |
| Cornell Hill Health | $95,971 |
| Casa Otonal Inc | $71,494 |
| Integrated Refugee & Resettlement Services | $68,692 |
| Fellowship Place | $58,871 |
| Juanta for Progressive Action | $46,057 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
None of your grants could be placed against low income need for this view.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 32% of CommuniCare’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in CT; read by stated purpose it is 68% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $186k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BIBHcare Inc5× · 2021–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +23%
- BHBRIDGES HEALTHCARE INC5× · 2021–2025 · $869k · revenue +23%
- CACHEMICAL ABUSE SERVICES AGENCY INC5× · 2021–2025 · $499k · revenue +41%
Funded once
- COCASA OTONAL INC3× · 2023–2025 · $71k · revenue -29%
- IRINTEGRATED REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SERVICES2× · 2024–2025 · $69k · revenue 0%
- JFJUNTA FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTION INC2× · 2024–2025 · $46k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide medical services for the residents of the greater hartford connecticut area. to provide quality health care services to low and moderate income individuals in the greater hartford connecticut area regardless of ability to pay.
To provide substance abuse and mental health treatment services. programs include methadone maintenance, outpatient, hiv, detoxification and dually diagnosed treatments and counseling.
To improve the health and well-being of our community by providing high quality, coordinated health and support services, accessible to all.
Mhc partners with individuals, their families, and surrounding communities to create environments that support long-term health and wellness.
United services mission is to provide an effective response to the youth, family, and adult social and behavioral health needs in the community. united services is the most comprehensive private, non-profit center in connecticut providing…
Community action agency of new haven, inc. offers pathways to prosperity to those in poverty in the greater new haven area through: service - collaboration - advocacy - knowledge generation.
To provide a broad range of primary care services, including medical, dental and behavioral health services to marginalized communities in bridgeport, stratford, milford, stamford and west haven.
To enhance patient safety by supporting the health and well-being of ct health professionals. haven offers a confidential alternative for healthcare professionals facing the challenges of chemical dependency, emotional or behavorial…
Harvard street neighborhood health center serves as the primary health resource to our community, through the delivery of comprehensive patient-centered medical care.
To provide quality, innovative care that enriches the lives of our patients.
To provide primary health management care to the uninsured and underinsured population of northwestern connecticut, regardless of the individual's ability to pay for these services.
The association is the leader in providing services to and advocating for, the state's providers of long-term, subacute, rehabilitative, and assisted living care. additionally, the association serves as a clearing house for information…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bridges Healthcare Inc and the most unlike its peers is Yale University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BHcare Inc ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES HEALTHCARE INC ↗
- Who funds CHEMICAL ABUSE SERVICES AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds FAIR HAVEN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC HEALTH COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds CORNELL SCOTT-HILL HEALTH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Yale University ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OTONAL INC ↗
- Who funds INTEGRATED REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds JUNTA FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Newalliance Foundation Inc · Yale University · The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · Agency on Aging of South Central Connecticut · United Way of Greater New Haven Inc · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization CommuniCare funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- BHcare Inc — 68% of income from government
- Bridges Healthcare Inc — 67% of income from government
- Fellowship Place Inc — 66% of income from government
- Casa Otonal Inc — 59% of income from government
- Chemical Abuse Services Agency Inc — 40% of income from government
- Integrated Refugee and Immigrant Services — 37% of income from government
- Junta for Progressive Action Inc — 35% of income from government
- Fair Haven Community Health Clinic Inc — 18% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- Cornell Scott-Hill Health Corporation — 12% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to CommuniCare?
Find your warmest path to CommuniCare through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.