Skip to content

Kentucky · Public charity

Commonwealth Alliance Voter Engagement

COMMONWEALTH ALLIANCE VOTER ENGAGEMENT coordinates and supports grassroots movements in building organizing people power and shaping the political conditions that lead to an equitable and thriving commonwealth for all kentuckians.

$135k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
4
Itemized grants FY2024
6
Organizations funded FY2022
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$110k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$17,500
Largest grant, FY2024
$75,000
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$744k
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Public Benefit$120kEnvironment$23kHealth$13kCivil Rights$13kRecreation & Sports$9k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Kentucky Civic Engagement Table Inc$75,00015%
Operation Turnout$19,500111%
Hood to Holler Inc$17,5001n/a
Preserve Protect Defend$15,0001n/a
Planned Parenthood Alliance Advocates Serving Ak Hi Id in Ky and Wa$13,00020%
Change Today Change Tomorrow$10,00012%
The Revolution Kentucky$10,0001n/a
The Arena 527 PAC$9,4001n/a
Ky Conservation Committee$8,0001n/a

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Commonwealth Alliance Action FundKY16× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Commonwealth Alliance Action Fund · Tides Advocacy · Tides Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Commonwealth Alliance Voter Engagement with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Commonwealth Alliance Voter Engagement?

Find your warmest path to Commonwealth Alliance Voter Engagement through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Commonwealth Alliance Voter Engagement

How much does Commonwealth Alliance Voter Engagement give?
Commonwealth Alliance Voter Engagement reported 4 itemized grants totaling $109,500, out of $135,000 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Commonwealth Alliance Voter Engagement fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2024, its largest causes are Public Benefit (67%), Environment (13%), Health (7%).
Who are Commonwealth Alliance Voter Engagement's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2024: Kentucky Civic Engagement Table Inc ($75k), Operation Turnout ($20k), Hood to Holler Inc ($18k).
Which funders back the same organizations as Commonwealth Alliance Voter Engagement?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Commonwealth Alliance Action Fund, Tides Advocacy, Tides Foundation.
Where is Commonwealth Alliance Voter Engagement based?
Commonwealth Alliance Voter Engagement is based in KY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Commonwealth Alliance Voter Engagement’s filings →

More from the funding graph