Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Commonwealth Alliance Action Fund

To sustain lasting and impactful nonprofit and advocacy infrastructure and networks that support a thriving, informed, and active multi-racial democracy in kentucky.

$750k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$575k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232024.

Public Benefit$990kCivil Rights$110kHealth$45kPhilanthropy$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$15k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $175k
  • $250k+1 grant · $575k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$484k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMONWEALTH ALLIANCE VOTER ENGAGEMENT$575,000
PLANNED PARENTOHOOD ALLIANCE ADVOCATES - SERVING AK HI ID IN KY AND WA$45,000
SHOWING UP FOR RACIAL JUSTICE$25,000
FAIRNESS CAMPAIGN$25,000
KENTUCKY CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE$25,000
HOPEWELL FUND$20,000
HOOD TO THE HOLLER$20,000
PRESERVE PROTECT DEFEND$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PRESERVE PROTECT DEFEND: $25k → 14%PLANNED PARENTOHOOD ALLIANCE ADVOCATES - SERVING AK HI ID IN KY AND WA: $45k → 9%FAIRNESS CAMPAIGN: $25k → 15%PRESERVE PROTECT DEFEND: $15k → 14%COMMONWEALTH ALLIANCE VOTER ENGAGEMENT: $350k → 15%HOPEWELL FUND: $20k → 14%KENTUCKY CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE: $25k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kentucky Coalition Inc

To support grassroots organizing, leadership development & public education around important public policy. ky coalition seeks to promote active citizen participation in the democratic process.

Public Benefit
2
Kentucky Association for Economic Development Inc

Our purpose is to educate, advocate and connect with our members on issues that are important to the economic development in the commonwealth of kentucky.

Community Improvement
3
Kentuckians for the Commonwealth Inc

Kftc is a community of people inspired by a vision of a thriving society where people are free from oppression and where racial, economic and environmental justice exists for all. guided by black, indigenous, people of color, and others…

4
Kentucky County Judgeexecutive Associat

Provide services to governmental agencies.

5
Ky Access to Justice Commission Inc

To increase access to the courts and high-quality legal representation for people with low and moderate incomes living in kentucky through innovative partnerships with the judiciary, the civil legal aid programs, private bar, law schools,…

Crime & Legal
6
Kentucky Public Pension Coalition Inc

The mission of the organization is to protect pension plans for public employees in kentucky to ensure that these plans provide a secure retirement. the coalition works to educate legistlators, public officials, and the public on the facts…

Education
7
Pennsylvanians for Fair Courts

To develop and advocate for legislation, regulations, and government programs to protect against judicial gerrymandering and other legislative barriers to fair courts, and to conduct research about and publicize the positions of elected…

8
Kentucky Bar Association

To maintain a proper discipline of the members of the bar in accordance with the rules set forth by the kentucky supreme court and with the principles of the legal profession as a public calling, to initiate and supervise, with the…

9
Middle Kentucky Community Action Partnership Inc

To eliminate barriers, achieve economic security and empower families by partnering with other service providers.

10
Kentucky Saving Them Together Inc
Animals
11
Kentucky Association of Nurse Practitioners and Nurse Midwives Inc

To engage in the promotion of social welfare by developing and advocating for legislation, regulations, government programs and other policies that further the interests of aprns who are licensed to practice in kentucky, and to provide…

Community Improvement
12
Colorado People's Action

Colorado people's action (cpa) is a member-driven, racial justice organization dedicated to winning long-lasting progressive public policies in colorado. cpa builds power by mobilizing voters, electing our own people to office, holding…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Commonwealth Alliance Action Fund and the most unlike its peers is Fairness Campaign Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
3/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMONWEALTH ALLIANCE ACTION FUND — $575,000 · Public BenefitCOMMONWEALTH ALLIANCE ACTION FUNDCOMMONWEALTH ALLIANCE VOTER ENGAGEMENT — $350,000 · Civil RightsCOMMONWEALTH ALLIANCE VOTER ENGAGEMEN…SHOWING UP FOR RACIAL JUSTICE EDUCATION FUND INC — $40,000 · Civil RightsSHOWING UP FOR RACIAL JUSTICE EDUCATI…PRESERVE PROTECT AND DEFEND — $40,000 · OtherPRESERVE PRO…SHOWING UP FOR RACIAL JUSTICE INC — $25,000 · OtherSHOWING UP F…FAIRNESS CAMPAIGN INC — $25,000 · OtherFAIRNESS CAM…HOOD TO HOLLER INC — $20,000 · OtherHOOD TO HOLL…PRESERVE PROTECT DEFEND — $15,000 · OtherPRESERVE PRO…PLANNED PARENTHOOD ALLIANCE ADVOCATES SERVING AK HI ID IN KY AND WA — $45,000 · HealthKENTUCKY CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE INC — $25,000 · Community ImprovementHOPEWELL FUND — $20,000 · Philanthropy
Public Benefit$575,000Civil Rights$390,000Other$125,000Health$45,000Community Improvement$25,000Philanthropy$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMONWEALTH ALLIANCE ACTION FUND — $575,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetCOMMONWEALTH ALLIANCE VOTER ENGAGEMENT — $350,000 over 2y, 76% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD ALLIANCE ADVOCATES SERVING AK HI ID IN KY AND WA — $45,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPRESERVE PROTECT AND DEFEND — $40,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetSHOWING UP FOR RACIAL JUSTICE EDUCATION FUND INC — $40,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSHOWING UP FOR RACIAL JUSTICE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFAIRNESS CAMPAIGN INC — $25,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetKENTUCKY CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Commonwealth Alliance Action Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Commonwealth Alliance Action Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Commonwealth Alliance Action Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $554k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph