Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Commonspirit Washington Community Care F/K/A Harrison Medical Center

Harrison medical center provides acute medical and surgical services, emergency services and a range of general and specialized services to residents of the kitsap peninsula and adjacent areas.

$1.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 41% of COMMONSPIRIT WASHINGTON COMMUNITY CARE F/K/A HARRISON MEDICAL CENTER’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $141k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $463k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$56,179
Median grant
3
States reached
$849M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OLYMPIC COLLEGE FOUNDATION$1,000,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$149,785
YMCA OF PIERCE & KITSAP COUNTIES$100,000
PIERCE CENTER FOR ARTS & TECHNOLOGY$87,279
ALIMENTANDO AL PUEBLO$70,000
KITSAP COMM FOUNDATION$56,179
HOUSE OF HOPE INC$47,000
CKJ COMMUNITY HOMES$37,400
HOLLY RIDGE CENTER INC$32,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH PUGET SOUND$25,000
SCARLET ROAD$7,805
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HOLLY RIDGE CENTER INC: $32k → 10%YMCA of Pierce and Kitsap Counties: $195k → 9%YMCA OF PIERCE & KITSAP COUNTIES: $100k → 9%YMCA OF PIERCE AND KITSAP COUNTIES: $90k → 9%YMCA OF PIERCE AND KITSAP COUNTIES: $90k → 9%YMCA OF PIERCE AND KITSAP COUNTIES: $83k → 9%YMCA OF PIERCE & KITSAP COUNTIES: $62k → 9%NEW LIFE COMMUNITY DEVELOPEMENT CENTER: $100k → 10%ALIMENTANDO AL PUEBLO: $70k → 9%SCARLET ROAD: $8k → 10%GIG HARBOR FAMILY YMCA: $90k → 9%PLATEAU OUTREACH MINISTRIES: $25k → 9%GIG HARBOR FAMILY YMCA: $53k → 9%GIG HARBOR FAMILY YMCA: $50k → 9%GIG HARBOR FAMILY YMCA: $50k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.3M · 4 repeat orgs$2.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$3.3M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
0%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HM
    HARRISON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $2.0M · revenue -27% · 36% of their budget
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PIERCE AND KITSAP COUNTIES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $863k · revenue +47%
  • KC
    KITSAP COUNTY DEPT OF HUMAN SERVICES
    3× · 2017–2020 · $300k

Funded once

  • CW
    COMMONSPIRIT WASHINGTON F/K/A FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEMgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $721k · revenue +41%
  • KM
    KITSAP MENTAL HEALTH SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +35%
  • NL
    NEW LIFE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +86% · 31% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Peninsula Community Health Services of Alaska

Strengthening the community by providing accessible and affordable health care.

Health
2
South Peninsula Behavioral Health Services Inc

The organization operates primarily on the Southern Kenai Peninsula and its operations include the following:Community Mental Health - Counseling, evaluation, consultation and crisis mental health services for Adults and…

Health
3
Columbia River Mental Health Services

Columbia river mental health services is a full service mental health agency offering a wide spectrum of behavioral health services to children and adults of clark county, washington.

Health
4
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
5
Pierce County Accountable Community of Health

To advance the health of our population by eliminating health disparities including promoting equitable access to high quality and cost effective health and human services and resources, to prevent disease and improve health, to improve…

Health
6
North Olympic Healthcare Network

To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.

Health
7
Community Health Care

To provide the highest quality health care with compassionate and accessible service for all including comprehensive primary medical, dental and behavioral health care through a clinic system.

Health
8
Pacific Central Coast Health Centers

Pacific central coast health centers', sponsored by dignity community care, mission is to provide access to cost effective, quality medical services in the northern santa barbara county, san luis obispo county, kern county and ventura…

Health
9
Columbia River Health

Columbia river health exists to provide exceptional healthcare for everyone in our community.

Health
10
Anchorage Community Mental Health Services Inc

To promote recovery and wellness by providing consumer-driven behavioral healthcare services.

Health
11
Healthpoint

Healthpoint strengthens communities and improves people's health by delivering quality services, breaking down barriers and providing access to all.

Health
12
Olympic Peninsula Community Clinic

Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rainier Foothills Wellness Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Alimentando Al Pueblo. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
10/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HARRISON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $1,977,473 · OtherHARRISON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONKITSAP COUNTY DEPT OF HUMAN SERVICES — $300,000 · OtherKITSAP COUNTY DEPT OF HUMAN SERVICESKITSAP MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES — $100,000 · OtherPierce Center for Arts and Technology DBA ARIVVA — $87,279 · OtherCOMMONSPIRIT WASHINGTON F/K/A FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM — $720,580 · HealthCOMMONSPIRIT WASHINGT…Project Access Northwest — $190,000 · HealthProject Access Northw…American Heart Association Inc — $149,785 · HealthAmerican Heart Associ…THE HOUSE OF HOPE INC — $47,000 · Health+1 more — $35,752 · HealthYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PIERCE AND KITSAP COUNTIES — $862,605 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIA…NEW LIFE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $100,000 · Human ServicesNEW LIFE COMMUNITY D…ALIMENTANDO AL PUEBLO — $70,000 · Human ServicesALIMENTANDO AL PUEBL…+3 more — $64,805 · Human Services+3 moreOLYMPIC COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyOLYMPIC COLLEGE FOU…KITSAP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $56,179 · PhilanthropyRESILIENT IN SUSTAINING EMPOWERMENT — $95,000 · Crime & LegalEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY — $75,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY HOMES INC — $37,400 · Housing & ShelterBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH PUGET SOUND — $25,000 · Youth Development
Other$2,464,752Health$1,143,117Human Services$1,097,410Philanthropy$1,056,179Crime & Legal$95,000Food & Nutrition$75,000Housing & Shelter$37,400Youth Development$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHARRISON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $1,977,473 over 4y, 36% of budgetOLYMPIC COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PIERCE AND KITSAP COUNTIES — $862,605 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMONSPIRIT WASHINGTON F/K/A FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM — $720,580 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetProject Access Northwest — $190,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $149,785 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKITSAP MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW LIFE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $100,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetRESILIENT IN SUSTAINING EMPOWERMENT — $95,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY — $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF HOPE INC — $47,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetRAINIER FOOTHILLS WELLNESS FOUNDATION — $35,752 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetPLATEAU OUTREACH MINISTRIES — $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Norcliffe FoundationWA21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Norcliffe Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Kitsap Community Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Commonspirit Washington F/K/A Franciscan Health System · Multicare Health System · Medina Foundation · Greater Tacoma Community Foundation · Bremerton Central Lions Charitable Foundation · Kitsap Credit Union · Bainbridge Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Commonspirit Washington Community Care F/K/A Harrison Medical Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph