Skip to content

· Private foundation

Commons Impact Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2023
18
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2023.

Human Services$45kYouth Development$33kHealth$18kRecreation & Sports$15kEmployment$15kPublic Benefit$12kReligion$11kCommunity Improvement$10kOther$0
02FY2023 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$340
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLACK MOTHERS 4 JUSTICE INC (BLAMOT)$1,000
ANACOSTIA AMP OUTREACH EMPOWERMENT CENTERYOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATION$1,000
MY AUNT'S HOUSE INC (MYAUNT)$1,000
TEACHING RAMBUNCTIOUS ADOLESCENTS PEACEFUL POSITUDE (TRAPP STARS INC) (TEAR$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
SOCIAL ART AND CULTURE (SOCART)$1,000
TRIUMPHANT LEADERS OF DMV YOUTH PROGRAM$1,000
THE WOMEN INVOLVED IN REENTRY EFFORTS (TWIIRE)$1,000
COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT PROJECT$1,000
ANACOSTIA COORDINATING COUNCIL INC (ANACOO)$1,000
AALIYAH IN ACTION (AALACT)$1,000
ACEE THE FIRM FOUNDATION$1,000
ASCENSIONS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$1,000
MOMMAS SAFE HAVEN$1,000
THE HELPING OUR PEOPLE EMPOWERMENT GROUP INCORPORATED$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LYDIA'S HOUSE IN SOUTHEAST: $13k → 14%SOUL TRAK OUTDOORS: $4k → 14%FAR SOUTHEAST FAMILY STRENGTHENING COLLABORATIVE: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$152k · 18 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
13

Total granted

$152k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+19%

Still filing today

33%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationArts & CultureCivil RightsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CE
    COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT PROJECT
    4× · 2020–2023 · $12k · revenue +5%
  • WT
    WOODLAND TIGERS YOUTH SPORTS AND EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM
    3× · 2021–2023 · $8k · revenue ×14
  • SA
    SOCIAL ART AND CULTURE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $4k · revenue +143%

Funded once

  • LH
    LYDIA'S HOUSE IN SOUTHEASTgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $13k · revenue +64%
  • TB
    TINAS BABY
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • RA
    REINTEGRATING ALTERNATIVES PERSONAL PROGRAM
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ward 7 Blue Bulls Youth Organization

To empower and uplift the youth in under-resourced areas through comprehensive programming that takes a holistic approach for no cost or financial burden.

Recreation & Sports
2
Latinas Leading Tomorrow

Connect and expose Latinas to opportunities that enrich their future through education mentoring and leadership development.

Human Services
3
Black Girls Cook

Black Girls Cook aims to empower and inspire inner-city adolescent Black girls through food security, culinary arts, urban farming, entrepreneurship, and STEM, emphasizing Black Diaspora cultural histories and food practices.

Food & Nutrition
4
United Women of the Horn

United Women of the Horn (UWH) exists to advance the leadership, safety, and civic participation of Black immigrant women, with a focus on East African communities. The organization delivers trauma-informed, culturally grounded programs…

Civil Rights
5
Women Who Influence

Youth leadership program

Public Benefit
6
SocialSocietyU Inc

To empower youth and young adults through educational programs mentorship and career development opportunities supporting their personal and professional growth in underserved communities.

Education
7
Southside Community Center

Community Development Corporation - capacity building in youth and parents around areas of leadership development support and education housing

—
8
Youth Empowerment Project Inc

Enrichment and youth outreach

—
9
I Believe in Me Girls Inc

The mission of IBIM Girls is to empower girls to B.E.L.I.E.V.E (Become Emerging Leaders Inspiring Excellence and Values Everyday) through group mentoring and leadership training necessary to become responsible, productive and successful…

Youth Development
10
Village Leadership Program

We serve young people in the nations capital through leadership workforce development mental health and wellness programming.

Education
11
Walker Mill Community Development Corporation

Walker Mill Community Development Corporation is to support the poor and need. We feed people who are hungry more by partnering with the Washington, DC food bank. We also work to train families how to grow their own food by partnering with…

Youth Development
12
Dc Community Development Consortium Institute
Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helping Our People Empowerment Group Inc; the most unlike its peers is Social Art and Culture. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACEE THE FIRM FOUNDATION: $13,250 · OtherACEE THE FIRM FOUNDATIONTRIUMPHANT LEADERS OF DMV YOUTH PROGRAM: $12,255 · OtherTRIUMPHANT LEADERS OF DMV YOUTH PROGRAMCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT PROJECT: $12,055 · OtherCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT PROJECTANACOSTIA AMP OUTREACH EMPOWERMENT CENTERYOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATION: $11,055 · OtherANACOSTIA AMP OUTREACH EMPOWERMENT CENTERYOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATIO…ANGELS OF HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $10,555 · OtherANGELS OF HOPE MINISTRIES INCMY AUNT'S HOUSE INC (MYAUNT): $6,000 · OtherTHE NON-PROFIT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $6,000 · OtherANACOSTIA COORDINATING COUNCIL INC (ANACOO): $4,055 · OtherAALIYAH IN ACTION (AALACT): $4,055 · OtherTINAS BABY: $4,000 · OtherREINTEGRATING ALTERNATIVES PERSONAL PROGRAM: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherNO MORE GRAVES FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherMINT PROJECT INC (MINPRO): $4,000 · OtherBLACK MOTHERS 4 JUSTICE INC (BLAMOT): $4,000 · Other+4 more: $5,500 · OtherLYDIA'S HOUSE IN SOUTHEAST: $13,000 · Human ServicesLYDIA'S HO…Soul Trak Outdoors: $4,000 · Human ServicesSoul Trak …+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesMommas Safe Haven: $12,055 · Arts & CultureMommas Sa…SOCIAL ART AND CULTURE: $4,055 · Arts & CultureSOCIAL AR…WOMEN INVOLVED IN REENTRY EFFORTS: $15,000 · Civil RightsASCENSIONS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $14,250 · HealthWOODLAND TIGERS YOUTH SPORTS AND EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM: $8,055 · Recreation & SportsEbony Horsewomen Inc: $4,000 · Recreation & SportsHELPING OUR PEOPLE EMPOWERMENT GROUP INC: $7,500 · EducationWilliam O Lockridge Community Foundation: $1,300 · EducationCOMMUNITY OF HOPE: $1,098 · Community Improvement
Other$112,780Human Services$17,500Arts & Culture$16,110Civil Rights$15,000Health$14,250Recreation & Sports$12,055Education$8,800Community Improvement$1,098

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOMEN INVOLVED IN REENTRY EFFORTS: $15,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetASCENSIONS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $14,250 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT PROJECT: $12,055 over 4y, 23% of budgetMommas Safe Haven: $12,055 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetWOODLAND TIGERS YOUTH SPORTS AND EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM: $8,055 over 3y, 17% of budgetHELPING OUR PEOPLE EMPOWERMENT GROUP INC: $7,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetSOCIAL ART AND CULTURE: $4,055 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetEbony Horsewomen Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetOASIS COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY OF HOPE: $1,098 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOMEN INVOLVED IN REENTRY EFFORTS ↗
  • Who funds ASCENSIONS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds LYDIA'S HOUSE IN SOUTHEAST ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Mommas Safe Haven ↗
  • Who funds WOODLAND TIGERS YOUTH SPORTS AND EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds HELPING OUR PEOPLE EMPOWERMENT GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL ART AND CULTURE ↗
  • Who funds Soul Trak Outdoors ↗
  • Who funds Ebony Horsewomen Inc ↗
  • Who funds OASIS COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds William O Lockridge Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds FAR SOUTHEAST FAMILY STRENGTENING ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC14.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · Center for Nonprofit Advancement · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Commons Impact Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Commons Impact Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Ebony Horsewomen Inc: 18% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Commons Impact Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Commons Impact Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Commons Impact’s filings →

More from the funding graph