Skip to content

Vermont · Public charity

Coming Clean Inc

Coming cleans mission is to meaningfully contribute to environmental health and justice by radically reducing sources of chemical exposure in peoples lives, especially disproportionately impacted populations; to aggressively advocate for corporate and marketplace changes as a driver for policy solutions that address toxic chemicals as a…

$401k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
16
Itemized grants FY2025
20
Organizations funded FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$332k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$18,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$45,500
States reached, FY2025
9
Total assets, FY2025
$2.9M

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
NY
OR
PA
CA
KY
WV
NM
GA
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2024 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Community Networking Resources Inc$91,0002n/a
Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc$52,00020%
Texas Environmental Justice Advocacy$50,62524%
React Ed and Defense Fund$45,5001n/a
Pueblo Organizado En Defensa de la Tierra y Sus Recursos$38,50024%
Organizacion en California de Lideres Campesinas Inc$36,00020%
Alaska Community Action on Toxics$35,97920%
Until Justice Data Partners Inc$33,96329%
Multiplier$29,37720%
Learning Disabilities Association of America$29,00014%
Show all 24 grantees

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Coming Clean Inc supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSocial and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc: $52,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Environmental Justice Advocacy: $50,625 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetPueblo Organizado En Defensa de la Tierra y Sus Recursos: $38,500 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetOrganizacion en California de Lideres Campesinas Inc: $36,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAlaska Community Action on Toxics: $35,979 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUntil Justice Data Partners Inc: $33,963 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetMultiplier: $29,377 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLearning Disabilities Association of America: $29,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetJust Transition Alliance: $27,761 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNorthwest Center for Alternatives to Pesticides: $25,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetFarmworker Association of Florida Inc: $21,709 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCarl Braden Memorial Center Inc: $18,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetHarambee House Inc: $18,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetWest Virginia Citizen Action Education Fund: $12,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCenter for Political Ecology: $10,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetHealthy Schools Network Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetEnvironmental Community Action Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMaryland Pesticide Education Network Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetPesticide Action Network North America: $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 19.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) IncCA25.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc · Windward Fund · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Grassroots International Inc · Solutions Project Inc · Movement Strategy Center · Natural Resources Defense Council Inc · Clif Family Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Tides Foundation · New Venture Fund · The Partnership Project Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Coming Clean Inc with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Coming Clean Inc?

Find your warmest path to Coming Clean Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Coming Clean Inc

How much does Coming Clean Inc give?
Coming Clean Inc reported 16 itemized grants totaling $332,237, out of $400,814 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing.
What does Coming Clean Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2024 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (42%), Social Science (15%), Health (9%).
Who are Coming Clean Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2024 to FY2025: Community Networking Resources Inc ($91k), Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc ($52k), Texas Environmental Justice Advocacy ($51k).
Which funders back the same organizations as Coming Clean Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc, Windward Fund, Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc.
Where is Coming Clean Inc based?
Coming Clean Inc is based in VT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Coming Clean’s filings →

More from the funding graph