Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Comeau Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$339k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Health$405kYouth Development$175kEnvironment$150kInternational$75kArts & Culture$60kEducation$59kCommunity Improvement$50kFood & Nutrition$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $330k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOMAN FOR HEALTHY RURAL LIVING$40,000
LIFELINE PUPPY RESCUE$40,000
HANDS IN OUTREACH$25,000
WAYPOINT ADVENTURES$25,000
LIFE RING SECULAR RECOVERY$20,000
BLUE HILL HERITAGE TRUST$20,000
SECOND WIND FUND$20,000
TENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDREN$20,000
THORNE NATURE EXPERIENCE$20,000
BAGS OF FUN$15,000
ELEVATE YOUTH$15,000
BOSTON SCORES$15,000
DOC WAYNE$15,000
GOOD SPORTS$10,000
SOJOURNER HOUSE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 96% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%GOOD SPORTS: $20k → 7%LOAVES AND FISHES: $25k → 8%HANDS IN OUTREACH: $25k → 12%ELEVATE YOUTH: $20k → 16%LIFE RING SECULAR RECOVERY: $20k → 10%ONE LOVE FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%BAGS OF FUN: $15k → 8%LIFELINE PUPPY RESCUE: $40k → 10%RISE: $25k → 12%TENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 12%SAFE PASSAGE: $20k → 7%OLD SURRY VILLAGE SCHOOL: $20k → 11%WOMEN FOR HEALTHY RURAL LIVING: $40k → 16%GOOD SPORTS: $10k → 7%WAYPOINT ADVENTURE: $25k → 8%HANDS IN OUTREACH: $25k → 12%ELEVATE YOUTH: $15k → 16%LIFE RING SECULAR RECOVERY: $20k → 10%BAGS OF FUN: $15k → 8%RISE AGAINST SUICIDE: $25k → 12%TENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 12%WOMEN FOR HEALTHY RURAL LIVING: $40k → 16%WAYPOINT ADVENTURE: $25k → 8%HANDS IN OUTREACH: $25k → 12%ELEVATE YOUTH: $15k → 16%LIFE RING SECULAR RECOVERY: $20k → 10%BAGS OF FUN: $15k → 8%THORNE NATURE EXPERIENCE: $20k → 12%TENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 12%BLUE HILL HERITAGE TRUST: $20k → 11%WOMAN FOR HEALTHY RURAL LIVING: $40k → 16%BOSTON SCORES: $15k → 16%PHILANTHROPIC VENTURES: $20k → 10%THORNE NATURE EXPERIENCE: $20k → 12%FOOD FOR THOUGHT: $15k → 12%BLUE HILL HERITAGE TRUST: $20k → 11%WOMEN FOR HEALTHY RURAL LIVING: $20k → 16%WAYPOINT ADVENTURES: $25k → 8%BOSTON SCORES: $20k → 16%THORNE NATURE EXPERIENCE: $20k → 12%PROJECT ANGEL HEART: $20k → 12%BLUE HILL HERITAGE TRUST: $20k → 11%BOSTON SCORES: $15k → 16%PROJECT ANGEL HEART: $20k → 12%BLUE HILL HERITAGE TRUST: $20k → 11%DOC WAYNE: $15k → 16%SECOND WIND FUND: $30k → 12%SECOND WIND FUND: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$949k · 16 repeat orgs$200k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against -12% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
7

Total granted

$949k
$140k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
-12%

Still filing today

69%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentHealthEnvironmentEducationInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    WAYPOINT ADVENTURE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $85k · revenue +154%
  • BH
    BLUE HILL HERITAGE TRUST
    4× · 2021–2024 · $80k · revenue +14%
  • HI
    HANDS IN OUTREACH INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $75k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • RA
    Rise Against Suicide
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -12%
  • LA
    LOAVES AND FISHES
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • R
    RISE
    one grant, 2022 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Aim Youth Mental Health

See Schedule O regarding Organization's mission.AIM is bridging the gap between research and access to care for youth struggling with their mental health by finding, funding and implementing evidence-based treatments, empowering youth to…

Health
2
Vive

VIVE addresses the health equity and wellness needs of many of Colorados low-income youth, who face significant health disparities and often lack access to engaging physical activity and health education.

Youth Development
3
Rise Above the Disorder

Rise Above The Disorder is a non-profit centered on making mental health care accessible and affordable to everyone. Our cause was founded in 2012 as a team of volunteers helping people find local therapists and crowd-funding the cost of…

Health
4
Horizons for Youth

Horizons for Youth mission is to transform children's lives by providing targeted resources, rooted in education, in a trusting partnership with their families and communities.

Youth Development
5
Connors Climb Foundation

The mission of connor's climb foundation is to provide suicide prevention education by raising awareness, reducing stigma, and equipping youth, educators, and the community at large with tools and resources focused on the vulnerable age…

Health
6
Youth Guidance

A leader in social and emotional development, community engagement, and positive youth development, Youth Guidance has strategically created programs to address community needs across four delivery areas: Community & Afterschool Programs…

Education
7
Positive Tracks Inc

Positive tracks equips ages 12-25 with the skills and resources to build and lead their own athletic challenges to champion causes they care about most, so young people can change the world.

Philanthropy
8
Youth Homes

The mission of youth homes is to help every youth feel safe, have a sense of belonging, and find a place to call home.

Human Services
9
Exalt Youth

Exalt youth serves youth involved in the criminal justice system, moving them away from incarceration towards re-engagement with education and meaningful job opportunities. our students come from some of the most economically depressed…

Youth Development
10
Youthbuild Global Inc

With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…

Employment
11
Wind Youth Services Inc

Provide Emergency Housing, Supportive Services and Opportunitites to Youth Experiencing Homelessness.

Human Services
12
The Aspen Effect Inc

Create youth interactions that strengthen resilience and leadership and help prevent mental health crisis.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Sports Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lifeline Pet Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
8/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LIFE RING SECULAR RECOVERY — $60,000 · OtherLIFE RING SECULAR RECOVERYTENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDREN — $60,000 · OtherTENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDRENBAGS OF FUN — $55,000 · OtherBAGS OF FUNIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOLD SURRY VILLAGE SCHOOL — $29,000 · OtherOLD SURRY VILLAGE SCHOOLLOAVES AND FISHES — $25,000 · OtherLOAVES AND FISHESRISE — $25,000 · OtherRISEFOOD FOR THOUGHT — $15,000 · OtherLIFELINE PET RESCUE — $40,000 · OtherLIFELINE PET RESCUEDOC WAYNE INC — $25,000 · OtherDOC WAYNE INC+2 more — $20,000 · OtherWAYPOINT ADVENTURE INC — $85,000 · Youth DevelopmentWAYPOINT ADVENTURE INCAmerica Scores New England DBA Boston Scores — $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentAmerica Scores New Eng…Elevate Youth Inc — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentElevate Youth IncGOOD SPORTS INC — $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentGOOD SPORTS INCWOMEN FOR HEALTHY RURAL LIVING — $140,000 · HealthWOMEN FOR HEALTHY …Rise Against Suicide — $25,000 · HealthRise Against Suici…THE JED FOUNDATION — $20,000 · HealthTHE JED FOUNDATIONBLUE HILL HERITAGE TRUST — $80,000 · EnvironmentBLUE HILL HERI…THORNE ECOLOGICAL INSTITUTE — $70,000 · EnvironmentTHORNE ECOLOGI…HANDS IN OUTREACH INC — $75,000 · InternationalHANDS IN …Safe Passage — $20,000 · InternationalSafe Pass…SECOND WIND FUND INC — $50,000 · EducationTHE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC — $10,000 · EducationPROJECT ANGEL HEART — $50,000 · Community Improvement
Other$384,000Youth Development$225,000Health$185,000Environment$150,000International$95,000Education$60,000Community Improvement$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWOMEN FOR HEALTHY RURAL LIVING — $140,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetWAYPOINT ADVENTURE INC — $85,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetBLUE HILL HERITAGE TRUST — $80,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetHANDS IN OUTREACH INC — $75,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetTHORNE ECOLOGICAL INSTITUTE — $70,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetAmerica Scores New England DBA Boston Scores — $60,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetElevate Youth Inc — $50,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetSECOND WIND FUND INC — $50,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL HEART — $50,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGOOD SPORTS INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRise Against Suicide — $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetDOC WAYNE INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSafe Passage — $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOJOURNER HOUSE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA16.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Comeau Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 15%
  • America Scores New England Dba Boston Scores30% of income from government
  • Doc Wayne Inc15% of income from government
  • Sojourner House Inc11% of income from government
  • Artists for Humanity Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Comeau Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Comeau Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph